Extubation strategies in neuro-intensive care unit patients and associations with outcomes: the ENIO multicentre international observational study.
Weaning
brain injury
extubation
intra-cranial haemorrhage
subarachnoid haemorrhage
tracheostomy
traumatic brain injury
ventilator liberation
Journal
Annals of translational medicine
ISSN: 2305-5839
Titre abrégé: Ann Transl Med
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101617978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
13
5
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
13
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prolonged invasive ventilation is common in patients with severe brain injury. Information on optimal management of extubation and on the use of tracheostomy in these patients is scarce. International guidelines regarding the ventilator liberation and tracheostomy are currently lacking. The aim of 'Extubation strategies in Neuro-Intensive care unit patients and associations with Outcomes' (ENIO) study is to describe current management of weaning from invasive ventilation, focusing on decisions on timing of tracheal extubation and tracheostomy in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with brain injury. We conducted a prospective, international, multi-centre observational study enrolling patients with various types of brain injury, including trauma, stroke, and subarachnoid haemorrhage, with an initial Glasgow Coma Score equal or less than 12, and a duration of invasive ventilation longer than 24 hours from ICU admission. ENIO is expected to include at least 1,500 patients worldwide. The primary endpoint of the ENIO study is extubation success in the 48 hours following endotracheal tube removal. The primary objective is to validate a score predictive of extubation success. To accomplish this, the study population will be randomly divided to a development cohort (2/3 of the included patients) and a validation cohort (the remaining 1/3). Secondary objectives are: to determine the incidence of extubation success rate according to various time-frames (within 96 hours, >96 hours after extubation); to validate (existing) prediction scores for successful extubation according to various time-frames and definitions (i.e., tracheostomy as extubation failure); and to describe the current practices of extubation and tracheostomy, and their associations. ENIO will be the largest prospective observational study of ventilator liberation and tracheostomy practices in patients with severe brain injury undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, providing a validated predictive score of successful extubation. The ENIO study is registered in the Clinical Trials database: NCT03400904.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prolonged invasive ventilation is common in patients with severe brain injury. Information on optimal management of extubation and on the use of tracheostomy in these patients is scarce. International guidelines regarding the ventilator liberation and tracheostomy are currently lacking.
METHODS
METHODS
The aim of 'Extubation strategies in Neuro-Intensive care unit patients and associations with Outcomes' (ENIO) study is to describe current management of weaning from invasive ventilation, focusing on decisions on timing of tracheal extubation and tracheostomy in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with brain injury. We conducted a prospective, international, multi-centre observational study enrolling patients with various types of brain injury, including trauma, stroke, and subarachnoid haemorrhage, with an initial Glasgow Coma Score equal or less than 12, and a duration of invasive ventilation longer than 24 hours from ICU admission. ENIO is expected to include at least 1,500 patients worldwide. The primary endpoint of the ENIO study is extubation success in the 48 hours following endotracheal tube removal. The primary objective is to validate a score predictive of extubation success. To accomplish this, the study population will be randomly divided to a development cohort (2/3 of the included patients) and a validation cohort (the remaining 1/3). Secondary objectives are: to determine the incidence of extubation success rate according to various time-frames (within 96 hours, >96 hours after extubation); to validate (existing) prediction scores for successful extubation according to various time-frames and definitions (i.e., tracheostomy as extubation failure); and to describe the current practices of extubation and tracheostomy, and their associations.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
ENIO will be the largest prospective observational study of ventilator liberation and tracheostomy practices in patients with severe brain injury undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, providing a validated predictive score of successful extubation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The ENIO study is registered in the Clinical Trials database: NCT03400904.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32395547
doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.160
pii: atm-08-07-503
pmc: PMC7210208
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03400904']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
503Informations de copyright
2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.160). Pr Karim Asehnoune received fees from Baxter, Edwards, LFB, Fisher and Payckel, out of the scope of the present work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep 15;196(6):792-795
pubmed: 28170290
Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56
pubmed: 17470624
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):835-842
pubmed: 28288027
Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1088-98
pubmed: 22998718
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jan;14(1):85-93
pubmed: 27870576
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1530-6
pubmed: 10806150
Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):338-346
pubmed: 28640020
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):64-75
pubmed: 25252684
Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):613-20
pubmed: 25479115
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2012 Mar;74(2):245-266
pubmed: 25506256
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):104-114
pubmed: 27749290
Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2612-8
pubmed: 21765357
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):658-64
pubmed: 11254520
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1482-92
pubmed: 21378554
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 23;22(1):236
pubmed: 30243304
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):14-8
pubmed: 25951678
J Trauma. 1998 May;44(5):839-44; discussion 844-5
pubmed: 9603086