Osteochondral Autograft Plugs versus Paste Graft:
articular cartilage paste graft
cartilage repair
gene expression
osteochondral autograft
Journal
Cartilage
ISSN: 1947-6043
Titre abrégé: Cartilage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518378
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
7
4
2022
entrez:
13
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients undergoing articular cartilage paste grafting have been shown in studies to have significant improvement in pain and function in long-term follow-ups. We hypothesized that This institutional review board-approved study characterizes the effects of impacting osteochondral plugs harvested from the intercondylar notch of 16 patients into a paste, leaving one graft intact as a control. Cell viability/proliferation, collagen type I/II, SOX-9, and aggrecan gene expression via qRT-PCR (quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) were analyzed at 24 and 48 hours. Matrix production and cell morphology were evaluated using histology. Paste samples from patients (mean age 39.7) with moderate (19%) to severe (81%) cartilage lesions displayed 34% and 80% greater cell proliferation compared to plugs at 24 and 48 hours post processing, respectively ( Paste graft preparation resulted in increased mobility of chondrocytes by matrix disruption without loss of cell viability. The impaction procedure stimulated chondrocyte proliferation resulting in a cellular response to reestablish native extracellular matrix. Analysis of gene expression supports a regenerative process of cartilage tissue formation and contradicts long-held beliefs that impaction trauma leads to immediate cell death. This mechanism of action translates into clinical benefit for patients with moderate to severe cartilage damage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32396463
doi: 10.1177/1947603520916552
pmc: PMC8808900
doi:
Substances chimiques
Collagen Type II
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1058S-1065SRéférences
Physiol Genomics. 2005 May 11;21(3):389-95
pubmed: 15769908
Biomaterials. 2011 Aug;32(24):5581-9
pubmed: 21565399
J Orthop Res. 2003 Sep;21(5):881-7
pubmed: 12919877
J Orthop Res. 2001 Sep;19(5):779-84
pubmed: 11562121
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Dec;62(8):1232-51
pubmed: 7440603
Cartilage. 2012 Jan;3(1 Suppl):77S-86S
pubmed: 26069613
Sports Health. 2014 May;6(3):265-73
pubmed: 24790697
Br J Radiol. 2003 Nov;76(911):777-87
pubmed: 14623778
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004;69(2):115-9
pubmed: 15307383
J Knee Surg. 2002 Summer;15(3):170-6
pubmed: 12152979
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3824-3833
pubmed: 27695904
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3541-3549
pubmed: 29039969
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014 Jul;24(3):249-53
pubmed: 25114387
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2053-63
pubmed: 19251676
J Immunol Methods. 1983 Dec 16;65(1-2):55-63
pubmed: 6606682
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Aug;21(8):1770-6
pubmed: 22572868
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Apr;466(4):952-62
pubmed: 18196358
Joints. 2017 Jul 28;5(2):93-106
pubmed: 29114638
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2003;68(4):237-41
pubmed: 14702675
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004;69(3):153-7
pubmed: 15521398
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2003;68(5):329-33
pubmed: 15104044
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):291-9
pubmed: 16517314
World J Orthop. 2015 Dec 18;6(11):1006-11
pubmed: 26716098
Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb;30(2):222-6
pubmed: 24485115