A Comparison of UK Preterm Anthropometric Charts and INTERGROWTH-21st: Is It Time to Change Growth Charts?
Growth reference
Growth standard
INTERGROWTH-21st
Neonatal and Infant Close Monitoring
Nutrition/Growth
Preterm growth
Journal
Neonatology
ISSN: 1661-7819
Titre abrégé: Neonatology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101286577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
09
2019
accepted:
04
03
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
1
9
2021
entrez:
13
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current practice in the UK is to plot premature infant anthropometric measurements on Neonatal and Infant Close Monitoring (NICM) reference charts. These charts have several known limitations. The INTERGROWTH-21st Project has recently produced international ante- and postnatal growth standards. Exact knowledge of growth centiles allows clinicians to accurately assess infant nutritional requirements. To compare target centile measurements between INTERGROWTH-21st and UK NICM growth charts for premature infants. Anthropometric measurements (weight and head circumference) of a convenience sample of neonates born between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation were analysed retrospectively. Measurements were collected across three time points and plotted on both the NICM and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts. The respective centiles were compared and analysed by paired-sample t test, Wilcoxon rank test analysis, and multilevel mixed-effect linear regression models. Centiles for weight and head circumference measurements of 96 infants plotted on INTERGROWTH-21st charts were significantly greater than their corresponding UK charts at all three time points. For weight, the average difference between the two charts varied from 9.1 to 16.4 centiles. The difference between the two charts was greater for female than male infants by up to 6.9 centiles (95% CI 10.1-3.8). Existing UK NICM reference charts are significantly different to the growth standards of INTERGROWTH-21st. The choice of which growth chart to adopt in the UK could have important consequences on premature infants' future adult health and therefore requires further prospective observational studies with larger data sets including length measurements and more comprehensive population characteristics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Current practice in the UK is to plot premature infant anthropometric measurements on Neonatal and Infant Close Monitoring (NICM) reference charts. These charts have several known limitations. The INTERGROWTH-21st Project has recently produced international ante- and postnatal growth standards. Exact knowledge of growth centiles allows clinicians to accurately assess infant nutritional requirements.
OBJECTIVE
To compare target centile measurements between INTERGROWTH-21st and UK NICM growth charts for premature infants.
METHOD
Anthropometric measurements (weight and head circumference) of a convenience sample of neonates born between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation were analysed retrospectively. Measurements were collected across three time points and plotted on both the NICM and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts. The respective centiles were compared and analysed by paired-sample t test, Wilcoxon rank test analysis, and multilevel mixed-effect linear regression models.
RESULTS
Centiles for weight and head circumference measurements of 96 infants plotted on INTERGROWTH-21st charts were significantly greater than their corresponding UK charts at all three time points. For weight, the average difference between the two charts varied from 9.1 to 16.4 centiles. The difference between the two charts was greater for female than male infants by up to 6.9 centiles (95% CI 10.1-3.8).
CONCLUSION
Existing UK NICM reference charts are significantly different to the growth standards of INTERGROWTH-21st. The choice of which growth chart to adopt in the UK could have important consequences on premature infants' future adult health and therefore requires further prospective observational studies with larger data sets including length measurements and more comprehensive population characteristics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32396901
pii: 000507024
doi: 10.1159/000507024
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
300-307Informations de copyright
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.