Transesophageal Echocardiography As a Monitoring Tool During Transvenous Lead Extraction-Does It Improve Procedure Effectiveness?

continuous intraprocedural monitoring transesophageal echocardiography transvenous lead extraction

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 May 2020
Historique:
received: 04 04 2020
revised: 15 04 2020
accepted: 02 05 2020
entrez: 14 5 2020
pubmed: 14 5 2020
medline: 14 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a valuable tool for monitoring the patient during transvenous lead extraction (TLE), but the direct impact of TEE on the effectiveness and safety of TLE has not yet been documented. The effectiveness of TLE and short-term survival were compared between two groups of patients: 2106 patients in whom TEE was performed before and after TLE and 1079 individuals in whom continuous TEE monitoring was used. The procedure-related risk of major complications was assessed using a predictive SAFeTY TLE score. The patients monitored by TEE were characterized by older age, more comorbidities and higher SAFeTY TLE scores (6.143 ± 4.395 vs. 5.593 ± 4.127; p = 0.004). Complete procedural success was significantly higher in the TEE-guided group (97.683% vs. 95.442%, Transesophageal echocardiography as a monitoring tool during transvenous lead extraction provides valuable results-higher rates of complete procedural success and a reduced risk of the most severe complications, thus preventing periprocedural deaths.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a valuable tool for monitoring the patient during transvenous lead extraction (TLE), but the direct impact of TEE on the effectiveness and safety of TLE has not yet been documented.
METHODS METHODS
The effectiveness of TLE and short-term survival were compared between two groups of patients: 2106 patients in whom TEE was performed before and after TLE and 1079 individuals in whom continuous TEE monitoring was used. The procedure-related risk of major complications was assessed using a predictive SAFeTY TLE score.
RESULTS RESULTS
The patients monitored by TEE were characterized by older age, more comorbidities and higher SAFeTY TLE scores (6.143 ± 4.395 vs. 5.593 ± 4.127; p = 0.004). Complete procedural success was significantly higher in the TEE-guided group (97.683% vs. 95.442%,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Transesophageal echocardiography as a monitoring tool during transvenous lead extraction provides valuable results-higher rates of complete procedural success and a reduced risk of the most severe complications, thus preventing periprocedural deaths.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32397115
pii: jcm9051382
doi: 10.3390/jcm9051382
pmc: PMC7290980
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Aug;15(8):926-32
pubmed: 24686256
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Sep;22(9):1348-57
pubmed: 10527016
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Dec;12(12):2381-6
pubmed: 26190318
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 28;9(2):
pubmed: 32013032
Cardiol Clin. 1992 Nov;10(4):735-48
pubmed: 1423384
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):918-923
pubmed: 28569386
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;1(5):442-448
pubmed: 29759473
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):313-20
pubmed: 25311409
Eur Heart J. 2017 Oct 21;38(40):2995-3005
pubmed: 28369414
Echocardiography. 2020 Apr;37(4):601-611
pubmed: 32154950
Europace. 2018 May 1;20(5):829-834
pubmed: 28339758
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Jul;21(7):861-7
pubmed: 18313266
Heart Rhythm. 2014 May;11(5):799-805
pubmed: 24444444
Echocardiography. 2019 May;36(5):980-986
pubmed: 30905087
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16):1553-61
pubmed: 20921437
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551
pubmed: 28919379
Europace. 2009 May;11(5):612-7
pubmed: 19329797
Europace. 2014 Oct;16(10):1496-507
pubmed: 24965015
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014 Aug;15(8):668-73
pubmed: 24850500
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):1807-1811
pubmed: 28842225
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 9;55(6):579-86
pubmed: 20152562
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(suppl_2):ii1-ii90
pubmed: 28903470

Auteurs

Dorota Nowosielecka (D)

Department of Cardiology The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland.

Wojciech Jacheć (W)

2nd Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.

Anna Polewczyk (A)

Department of Physiology, Patophysiology and Clinical Immunology, Collegium Medicum of Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-317 Kielce, Poland.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Swietokrzyskie Cardiology Center, 25-736 Kielce, Poland.

Łukasz Tułecki (Ł)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland.

Konrad Tomków (K)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland.

Paweł Stefańczyk (P)

Department of Cardiology The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland.

Andrzej Tomaszewski (A)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University, 20-400 Lublin, Poland.

Wojciech Brzozowski (W)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University, 20-400 Lublin, Poland.

Dorota Szcześniak-Stańczyk (D)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University, 20-400 Lublin, Poland.

Andrzej Kleinrok (A)

Department of Cardiology The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamosc, Poland.
University of Information Technology and Management, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.

Andrzej Kutarski (A)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University, 20-400 Lublin, Poland.

Classifications MeSH