Spinal Cord Impairment in Anti-Mag Neuropathy: Evidence from Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.
anti-MAG
neuropathy
somatosensory evoked potentials
spinal cord
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 05 2020
08 05 2020
Historique:
received:
31
03
2020
revised:
29
04
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
14
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neurological involvement classically manifests as a peripheral neuropathy with prominent sensitive symptoms. We describe a case report of a patient with positive anti-MAG antibodies presenting with clinical and neurophysiological evidence of spinal cord impairment. A 69-year-old woman came to our attention with subacute onset of dysesthesias at lower limbs and ataxia. Blood routine tests and hematological work-up led to a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. High titers of anti-MAG antibodies was revealed (34,594.70 BTU/ml, normal range 0-1000). Nerve conduction studies (NCS) ruled out a polyneuropathy at lower limbs. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) showed prolonged central conduction time (CTT) at lower limbs, suggesting a dorsal column damage. Brain and spinal cord Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) did not reveal any significant lesion. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evidenced an albumin-cytologic dissociation. She was treated with corticosteroids with temporary remission of sensory symptoms and normalization of CTT. Subsequently, she developed a multineuropathy which was successfully treated with Rituximab. We discuss the potential role of anti-MAG antibodies in the pathophysiology of dorsal column impairment and the clinical usefulness of SSEPs in monitoring the evolution of anti-MAG neuropathy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32397154
pii: brainsci10050282
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050282
pmc: PMC7287849
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Brain. 1994 Oct;117 ( Pt 5):949-57
pubmed: 7953604
Arch Neurol. 2007 Oct;64(10):1531-3
pubmed: 17923639
Muscle Nerve. 2016 Jan;53(1):78-83
pubmed: 25908550
Neurol Sci. 2019 Aug;40(8):1611-1617
pubmed: 31001716
Muscle Nerve. 2008 Nov;38(5):1447-1454
pubmed: 18932207
Brain Res. 1984 Mar 19;295(2):348-51
pubmed: 6713194
J Neuroimmunol. 1986 Apr;11(2):165-9
pubmed: 2419358
Neurosci Lett. 1987 Nov 10;82(1):77-82
pubmed: 2447531
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 May;89(5):499-505
pubmed: 29070644
J Neurol. 2018 Jan;265(1):115-118
pubmed: 29159464
BMJ Case Rep. 2009;2009:
pubmed: 21686895
Neurology. 1988 Mar;38(3):422-6
pubmed: 2450303
Neurology. 1981 Nov;31(11):1480-3
pubmed: 6273767
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 14;37(24):5885-5899
pubmed: 28522736
J Neurochem. 1982 Nov;39(5):1261-5
pubmed: 6181197
J Neurol Sci. 2003 Mar 15;207(1-2):43-9
pubmed: 12614930