Surface Comparison of Three Different Commercial Custom-Made Titanium Meshes Produced by SLM for Dental Applications.
3D printing
biomaterial
bone regeneration
roughness
surface properties
titanium mesh
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 May 2020
08 May 2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
revised:
05
05
2020
accepted:
06
05
2020
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
14
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of individualized titanium meshes has been referred to in scientific literature since 2011. There are many advantages to its use, however, the main complications are related to early or late exposures. As some aspects such as its surface properties have been pointed out to influence the soft tissue response, this study was designed to compare the surface characteristics of three commercially available individualized titanium meshes between them and according to the manufacturer's specifications. The results from the scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and the contact profilometry measurements were analyzed and cross-checked. It was discovered that, the BoneEasy's post-processing superficial treatment was more refined, as it delivers the mesh with the lowest Ra value, 0.61 ± 0.14 µm, due to the applied electropolishing. On the other hand, the Yxoss CBR
Identifiants
pubmed: 32397319
pii: ma13092177
doi: 10.3390/ma13092177
pmc: PMC7254327
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):536-43
pubmed: 15543910
Materials (Basel). 2014 Dec 19;7(12):8168-8188
pubmed: 28788296
Biomaterials. 2003 Oct;24(22):4081-9
pubmed: 12834604
Dent Mater. 2007 Apr;23(4):486-91
pubmed: 16620949
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Oct 21;15(1):115
pubmed: 27769304
J Periodontol. 2011 May;82(5):742-50
pubmed: 21054223
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Jan 29;2019:4231872
pubmed: 30838123
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul;114(1):22-6
pubmed: 25862269
Acta Cir Bras. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):200-5
pubmed: 19504002
Implant Dent. 2003;12(2):175-81
pubmed: 12861887
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Nov;51:61-73
pubmed: 26210549
Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):844-54
pubmed: 16904738
J Dent. 2012 Feb;40(2):146-53
pubmed: 22182466
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):373-81
pubmed: 27100807
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan 1;24(1):e70-e75
pubmed: 30573711
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Feb 13;5(1):12
pubmed: 30756245
Biomaterials. 2000 Apr;21(7):667-81
pubmed: 10711964
Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):258-65
pubmed: 18540401
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Feb;15(1):101-11
pubmed: 14731183
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):203-13
pubmed: 11952741
World J Clin Cases. 2015 Jan 16;3(1):52-7
pubmed: 25610850
Biointerphases. 2012 Dec;7(1-4):48
pubmed: 22875482
Microsc Microanal. 2017 Jun;23(3):491-500
pubmed: 28281410
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 May;62:960-6
pubmed: 26952502
J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Jan;57(1):3-14
pubmed: 23347794
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):803-10
pubmed: 22285340
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:791725
pubmed: 26436097
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):602-8
pubmed: 25979449
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2008 Jul;1(3):234-42
pubmed: 19627788
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8724951
pubmed: 29445746
J Periodontol. 1996 Jul;67(7):641-9
pubmed: 8832474
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Feb;43(2):87-91
pubmed: 3881576