Effect of N-Methylacetamide Concentration and Thawing Rate on Chicken Sperm Quality after Cryopreservation.
N-Methylacetamide
Sperm cryopreservation
cryodamage
cryoprotectants
thawing temperature
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 May 2020
09 May 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
revised:
03
05
2020
accepted:
07
05
2020
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
14
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In seeking alternative cryoprotectants to glycerol for a reference chicken semen freezing procedure, the aim of the present study was to compare the effect of two concentrations of N-Methylacetamide (MA) and two thawing rates on the quality of frozen-thawed semen. Semen samples were diluted in Lake pre-freezing extender, including 0.1 M trehalose in presence of 6% or 9% MA, loaded into straws, frozen in nitrogen vapors, and stored in liquid nitrogen. The following thawing treatments were used: 5 °C for 100 s and 38 °C for 30 s. Sperm quality (cell membrane integrity, motility and kinetic parameters) was assessed before and after cryopreservation. The decrease of MA concentration from 9 to 6% improved sperm quality after freezing/thawing and this effect was dependent on thawing temperature. Decreasing the MA concentration from 9 to 6% improved the proportion of undamaged membrane, motile, and progressive motile sperm recovered after thawing at 5 °C for 100 s; in contrast, no effect of the MA concentration was observed thawing at 38 °C for 30 s. Therefore, the treatment with 6% MA and thawing at 5 °C for 100 s has given the best cryoprotective action. These results contribute to improve the efficacy of the current chicken semen cryopreservation procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32397424
pii: ani10050824
doi: 10.3390/ani10050824
pmc: PMC7278425
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali
ID : 0011078
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Poult Sci. 1990 Jun;69(6):999-1002
pubmed: 2395794
Biol Reprod. 1999 Aug;61(2):400-5
pubmed: 10411518
Theriogenology. 2008 Jan 15;69(2):252-61
pubmed: 17977587
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1981;21(6B):1077-84
pubmed: 7349569
Br Poult Sci. 1981 Jan;22(1):71-7
pubmed: 7260699
Cryo Letters. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):427-34
pubmed: 23250402
Reprod Domest Anim. 2011 Apr;46(2):301-8
pubmed: 21158955
Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Feb;53(1):93-100
pubmed: 28891125
Mol Reprod Dev. 1990 Dec;27(4):326-31
pubmed: 2264994
Poult Sci. 1999 Apr;78(4):586-90
pubmed: 10230914
Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;85(2):216-22
pubmed: 16523616
Anim Reprod Sci. 2017 Sep;184:228-234
pubmed: 28779946
Anim Reprod Sci. 2016 Aug;171:58-64
pubmed: 27349144
Poult Sci. 1985 Jan;64(1):155-8
pubmed: 3975194
Poult Sci. 1978 Nov;57(6):1766-8
pubmed: 751054
Poult Sci. 2011 Sep;90(9):2047-53
pubmed: 21844272
Anim Reprod Sci. 2015 Mar;154:29-38
pubmed: 25600145
Br Poult Sci. 2016 Apr;57(2):264-70
pubmed: 26872498
Toxicol In Vitro. 1999 Jun;13(3):409-15
pubmed: 20654498
Cryobiology. 2016 Dec;73(3):343-347
pubmed: 27717656
Andrologia. 2014 May;46(4):329-38
pubmed: 23550608