Aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line treatment of M2 occlusions.
Acute ischemic stroke
M2 occlusions
aspiration thrombectomy
endovascular therapy
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
4
5
2021
entrez:
14
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the present study was (i) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspiration thrombectomy in patients with M2 occlusions and (ii) to compare outcome of treatment of occlusion of different M2 segments. Between March 2016 and June 2019, 82 patients with acute ischemic stroke and isolated M2 occlusions were treated in cerebrovascular stroke center with aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line treatment. Functional outcomes of patients with different types of M2 occlusions were statistically compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with good clinical outcome. The mean age was 71.9 ± 13.4 years, 47.6% were men. Aspiration thrombectomy alone was utilized in 72.5% of patients, with 27.5% of patients being treated with a combination of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever. At the three-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in functional outcome between different types of M2 occlusions (p = 0.662), however in the underpowered analysis because of the small sample size of patients, with good clinical outcome mRS 0-2 in 50% of all treated patients. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was found in 6.1% of patients. Lower age (OR 0.932, 95% CI 0.878-0.988) and lower NIHSS score upon admission (OR 0.893, 95% CI 0.805-0.991) were independent predictors of good clinical outcome. Aspiration thrombectomy appeared to be a safe and effective first-line treatment option for patients with M2 occlusion, being the first-line option for almost three-quarters of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32397859
doi: 10.1177/1591019920925678
pmc: PMC7446573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
383-388Références
Stroke. 2018 Feb;49(2):461-464
pubmed: 29284735
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Nov 1;73(11):1291-1296
pubmed: 27617425
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Nov;11(11):1065-1069
pubmed: 30975736
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jan;38(1):84-89
pubmed: 27765740
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452
pubmed: 28763550
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;25(6):697-704
pubmed: 31088246
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jul;10(7):620-624
pubmed: 29127196
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):419-427
pubmed: 31287757
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):246-51
pubmed: 15709120
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;37(4):667-72
pubmed: 26564442
Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2728-33
pubmed: 25096731
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Dec;8(12):1273-1277
pubmed: 26863104
Neurosurgery. 2017 Nov 1;81(5):795-802
pubmed: 28328002
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jul;7(7):478-83
pubmed: 24821842
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:684-691
pubmed: 28844911
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008
pubmed: 30860055
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;26(2):178-186
pubmed: 31847643
Ann Neurol. 1992 Jul;32(1):78-86
pubmed: 1642475
Interv Neurol. 2020 Jan;8(2-6):180-186
pubmed: 32508900