A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 05 2020
12 05 2020
Historique:
received:
06
12
2019
accepted:
06
04
2020
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 32398730
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3
pmc: PMC7217935
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7852Références
Gorlin, R. & Gorlin, S. G. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am. Heart J. 41, 1–29 (1951).
doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(51)90002-6
Sharif, D. & Abinader, E. G. Calculation of valve area by the Gorlin formula and continuity equation. Am. J. Cardiol. 69, 1111 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90880-8
Krouwer, J. S. Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat. Med. 27, 778–780, https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3086 (2008).
doi: 10.1002/sim.3086
pubmed: 17907247
Montenij, L. J., Buhre, W. F., Jansen, J. R., Kruitwagen, C. L. & de Waal, E. E. Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist. Br. J. Anaesth. 116, 750–758, https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew094 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/bja/aew094
pubmed: 27199309
Burwash, I. G. et al. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 89, 827–835, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.2.827 (1994).
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.2.827
pubmed: 8313572
Reddy, Y. N. V. & Nishimura, R. A. Evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis: a re-look at our current ‘gold standard’ measurements. Eur. Heart J. 39, 2656–2658, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy224 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy224
pubmed: 29718147
pmcid: 6055582
Gertz, Z. M. et al. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 5, 406–414, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967836 (2012).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967836
pubmed: 22647520
Critchley, L. A., Lee, A. & Ho, A. M. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth. Analg. 111, 1180–1192, https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b (2010).
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b
pubmed: 20736431
Dhingra, V. K., Fenwick, J. C., Walley, K. R., Chittock, D. R. & Ronco, J. J. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 122, 990–997, https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.3.990 (2002).
doi: 10.1378/chest.122.3.990
pubmed: 12226045
Espersen, K. et al. Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 39, 245–251 (1995).
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04051.x
Keren, H., Burkhoff, D. & Squara, P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am. J. Physiol. Heart circulatory physiology 293, H583–589, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00195.2007 (2007).
doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00195.2007
Marik, P. E. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. anesthesia 27, 121–134, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2012.03.022 (2013).
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.03.022
Ng, H. W., Walley, T. J. & Mostafa, S. M. Comparison of thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output measurement. Br. J. Anaesth. 73, 119–120 (1994).
doi: 10.1093/bja/73.1.119-b
Peyton, P. J. & Chong, S. W. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 113, 1220–1235, https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130 (2010).
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130
pubmed: 20881596
Squara, P. et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive care Med. 33, 1191–1194, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0640-0 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0640-0
pubmed: 17458538
Raval, N. Y. et al. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 22, 113–119, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5 (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5
pubmed: 18340540
Rich, J. D., Archer, S. L. & Rich, S. Evaluation Of Noninvasively Measured Cardiac Output In Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. respiratory Crit. care Med. 183, A6440, https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_MeetingAbstracts.A6440 (2011).
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_MeetingAbstracts.A6440
Critchley, L. A. & Critchley, J. A. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 15, 85–91 (1999).
doi: 10.1023/A:1009982611386
Tibballs, J., Hochmann, M., Osborne, A. & Carter, B. Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs. Anaesth. Intensive Care 20, 326–331 (1992).
doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000309
Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307–310 (1986).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
Huang, L., Critchley, L. A. & Zhang, J. Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively. Anesth. Analg. 121, 936–945, https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000889 (2015).
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000889
pubmed: 26218863