The Neurosurgical Intraoperative Checklist for Surgery of the Craniocervical Junction and Spine.

checklist craniocervical junction iatrogenic complication neurosurgery quality control spine

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 5 2020
pubmed: 14 5 2020
medline: 14 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many sectors within healthcare have adapted checklists to improve quality control. Notwithstanding the reported successful implementation of surgical checklists in the operating theater, a dearth of literature addresses the specific challenges posed by complex surgery in the craniocervical junction and spine. The authors devised an intraoperative checklist to address the common errors and verify the completion of objectives unique to these surgeries. The data over six years is presented retrospectively; no historical control for comparison is available, as those omissions and surgical errors addressed by the checklist are not generally registered in any morbidity and mortality reports. Through six years and approximately 1200 surgeries, the checklist was implemented with 98% compliance. The checklist eliminated the occurrences of mundane surgical errors, minimized iatrogenic complications, and ensured completion of specific objectives. We discuss that preoperative checklists, now in general use in all hospitals, have not addressed the most common, intraoperative omissions. These technical omissions result in part from the complexity of spine surgery and directly impact the surgical outcome. The Neurosurgical Intraoperative Checklist is a practical, rapid, and comprehensive means to prevent common, avoidable errors and iatrogenic complications inherent to spine surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32399322
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7588
pmc: PMC7212711
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e7588

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Henderson et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9
pubmed: 19144931
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S28-36
pubmed: 20407349
Surg Neurol. 2006 Nov;66(5):470-3; discussion 473-4
pubmed: 17084188
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):121-6
pubmed: 19342526
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Nov;33(5):E2
pubmed: 23116097
Cureus. 2020 Mar 2;12(3):e7160
pubmed: 32257703
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2012 Mar;23(2):60-9
pubmed: 22578605
Surgery. 1999 Jul;126(1):66-75
pubmed: 10418594
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70
pubmed: 10720363
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32
pubmed: 11541445
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Dec;42(4):915-936
pubmed: 30627832

Auteurs

Fraser Henderson (F)

Neurological Surgery, University of Maryland Prince George's Hospital Center, Largo, USA.
Neurological Surgery, Doctors Community Hospital, Lanham, USA.

Robert Rosenbaum (R)

Neurological Surgery, The Metropolitan Neurosurgery Group, Silver Spring, USA.
Neurological Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, USA.

Malini Narayanan (M)

Neurological Surgery, University of Maryland Prince George's Hospital Center, Cheverley, USA.

John Mackall (J)

Neurological Surgery, D&K Medical, LLC., Lanham, USA.

Clayton Korson (C)

Emergency Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, USA.

Classifications MeSH