Fat Graft Size: Relationship Between Cannula and Needle Diameters.
cannula
fat
fat grafting
plastic surgery
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Apr 2020
09 Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
14
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background It is generally believed that trauma to fat grafts is detrimental and affects the survival of the graft. In addition, it has been shown that smaller fat particle size corresponds to better survival; however, smaller cannula openings correspond to slower and more difficult fat graft harvesting. Objectives This study documents the relationship between cannula size, harvested fat cell size, and injection needle size. A means of reducing fat particle size following aspiration with larger diameter cannulas is also discussed. Methods Fat was harvested from five patients undergoing elective liposuction. Each fat sample was placed in a syringe and injected through progressively smaller needles until obstruction under low pressure was obtained. The minimal needle size was documented for each sample. Results Fat harvested with a liposuction cannula results in different size fat particles ranging up to the size of the cannula. Particles obtained from 3- and 4-mm cannulas can be injected without obstruction through a 16-gauge needle. Particles obtained from a 2-mm cannula can be injected without obstruction through an 18-gauge needle. Particles obtained from a 1-mm cannula can be injected without obstruction through a 20-gauge needle. Particles obtained from a 1-mm cannula could not be injected without obstruction through a 22-gauge needle. Conclusions There is a relationship between cannula opening size and the resultant fat graft size. Fat particles are somewhat compressible but should not be forced through needles or cannulas that are too narrow. It may be beneficial to harvest fat with larger cannulas and cut the particles to smaller sizes for injection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32399332
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7598
pmc: PMC7212710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e7598Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Vazquez et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.
Références
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):479-81
pubmed: 22964677
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct;136(4):897-912
pubmed: 26086386
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Oct 07;2(9):e220
pubmed: 25426403
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):471-83
pubmed: 19644262
Adipocyte. 2014 Dec 10;3(4):273-9
pubmed: 26317051
Aesthet Surg J. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):386, 388
pubmed: 19328166
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Sep;34(7):985-94
pubmed: 25028738
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 May 1;34(4):545-50
pubmed: 24604787
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov;142(5):1219-1225
pubmed: 30511975
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jun 27;20:49-60
pubmed: 28702187
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):391-5; discussion 396-7
pubmed: 14707664
Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Jul;32(5):554-61
pubmed: 22745443
Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1956 Oct;18(4):233-50
pubmed: 13379008
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Sep;62(9):1210-4
pubmed: 18572007
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3):303e-313e
pubmed: 24572875