The Efficacy and Safety of a Promising Single-Channel Endoscopic Closure Technique for Endoscopic Treatment-Related Artificial Ulcers: A Pilot Study.
Artificial mucosal ulcers
Complete closure
Endoloop
Single-channel endoscopic closure technique
Journal
Gastrointestinal tumors
ISSN: 2296-3774
Titre abrégé: Gastrointest Tumors
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101644585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
02
07
2019
accepted:
01
09
2019
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
14
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is important to appropriately manage patients with procedure-related artificial mucosal ulcers or procedure-related complications. Many endoscopic closure techniques have been reported; however, they often require the use of special devices. We developed a single-channel endoscopic closure technique (SCCT) that can be performed with conventional devices. In the present study, we describe the technique and evaluate its efficacy. Twenty-five consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment and whose artificial ulcer was closed using the SCCT were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate, number of clips for closure, procedure time, complication rate on the day of the procedure, clinical success rates on days 1 and 5, and incidence of severe stenosis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract at 2 months after the procedure were evaluated. The median ulcer diameter was 20 mm. The tumor locations were the stomach ( The SCCT could be applied in the treatment of artificial ulcers in several parts of the GI tract with a high clinical success rate and no complications. The SCCT appears to be a good option for closing artificial mucosal ulcers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
OBJECTIVE
It is important to appropriately manage patients with procedure-related artificial mucosal ulcers or procedure-related complications. Many endoscopic closure techniques have been reported; however, they often require the use of special devices. We developed a single-channel endoscopic closure technique (SCCT) that can be performed with conventional devices. In the present study, we describe the technique and evaluate its efficacy.
METHODS
METHODS
Twenty-five consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment and whose artificial ulcer was closed using the SCCT were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate, number of clips for closure, procedure time, complication rate on the day of the procedure, clinical success rates on days 1 and 5, and incidence of severe stenosis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract at 2 months after the procedure were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The median ulcer diameter was 20 mm. The tumor locations were the stomach (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The SCCT could be applied in the treatment of artificial ulcers in several parts of the GI tract with a high clinical success rate and no complications. The SCCT appears to be a good option for closing artificial mucosal ulcers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32399462
doi: 10.1159/000503994
pii: gat-0007-0021
pmc: PMC7206593
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
21-29Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1180-1189.e1
pubmed: 30653939
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):5099-5107
pubmed: 27005293
Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):487-496
pubmed: 29499578
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Jan;7(1):E36-E42
pubmed: 30648137
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2666-77
pubmed: 21424201
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):87-93
pubmed: 30055156
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 28;25(4):457-468
pubmed: 30700942
Endoscopy. 2016;48 Suppl 1:E142-3
pubmed: 27078629
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Feb;57(2):435-9
pubmed: 21901257
Dig Endosc. 2014 Mar;26(2):220-7
pubmed: 23621427
Endoscopy. 2015;47 Suppl 1 UCTN:E374-5
pubmed: 26273768
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Nov;60(5):836-8
pubmed: 15557972
Endoscopy. 2017 Aug;49(8):803-807
pubmed: 28561196
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2880-2885
pubmed: 30456512
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;34(1):22-30
pubmed: 30069935
Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297
pubmed: 28212588
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4438-44
pubmed: 26895895
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr 16;5(4):191-6
pubmed: 23596545
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 7;22(29):6595-609
pubmed: 27547003
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):837-842
pubmed: 27351654
Endosc Int Open. 2018 May;6(5):E582-E588
pubmed: 29756016
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1326-1333
pubmed: 30604266
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Mar;64(3):880-887
pubmed: 30284133
Digestion. 2012;85(2):80-4
pubmed: 22269283
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Dec;5(12):E1165-E1171
pubmed: 29201999
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Mar;51(3):375-381
pubmed: 30377063
Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S10-S14
pubmed: 30724676
Endoscopy. 2017 Feb;49(S 01):E31-E32
pubmed: 28068696