Data integration using the building technique in mixed-methods instrument development: Methodological discussion.

instrument development integration mixed methods nurses nursing research designs research methods

Journal

Journal of advanced nursing
ISSN: 1365-2648
Titre abrégé: J Adv Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609811

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
revised: 02 04 2020
received: 07 01 2020
accepted: 28 04 2020
medline: 14 5 2020
pubmed: 14 5 2020
entrez: 14 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To discuss and illustrate how meaningful integration can be achieved in instrument development design. Discussion paper. A mixed-methods study about challenges of nurse educators in Pakistan. The building technique was implemented when the findings of the qualitative phase were integrated to develop an instrument to determine educators' challenges while teaching nursing students in academic and clinical settings. Nurses are required to use cultural- and population-specific instruments for data collection. The six-step building approach can enable nurses to develop such instruments using rigorous and robust mixed-methods design. Building and merging techniques are used in instrument development design during and after the completion of the study, respectively. However, building technique is essential for using the qualitative findings to develop the instrument. The proposed building approach starts with a robust qualitative data analysis and is strengthened with the selection of key themes and subthemes, linking them to the participants' quotes and then the conversion of the quotes into meaningful and pertinent items. Using the proposed building integration technique can enable researchers to meaningfully and efficiently use qualitative findings for developing instruments using mixed-methods designs. Mixed methods are valuable for the development of data collection instruments that are tailored to the study context and relevant for the study participants. There is limited guidance about how meaningful integration can be achieved when developing research instruments using mixed methods. We proposed a practical building technique that allows researchers to meaningfully use qualitative findings from one phase to develop an instrument for the subsequent phase. The proposed approach is useful for researchers aiming to develop data collection instruments using mixed methods. 目的: 旨在探讨并阐述如何在工具开发设计中实现有意义的整合。 设计: 论文讨论。 数据来源: 一项关于巴基斯坦护士教育工作者面临的挑战的混合方法研究。在整合定性阶段的研究结果后,采用了构建技术,以开发一种工具,从而确定教育工作者在学术和临床环境中教授护理学生时面临的挑战。 对护理工作的影响: 护士须使用特定于文化和人口统计的工具来收集数据。根据六步构建法,护士可采用严格且可靠的混合方法设计来开发此类工具。 结论: 在研究过程中和研究完成后,在工具开发设计中,分别采用了构建技术和合并技术。但构建技术对于利用定性研究结果开发工具至关重要。所提出的构建方法从可靠的定性数据分析开始,并通过选择关键主题和子主题,将其与受试者的引用信息联系起来,然后将引用信息转化为有意义的相关项目,从而加强构建方法。利用所提出的构建整合技术,使研究者有意义地、有效地利用定性结果,利用混合方法设计开发工具。 影响: 在开发适合研究背景并与研究受试者相关的数据收集工具方面,混合方法非常有用。在使用混合方法开发研究工具时,有关如何实现有意义的整合的指导是有限的。在本研究中,提出了一种实用的构建技术,使研究人员能够有效使用某一阶段的定性研究结果,为后续阶段开发工具。所提出的方法对旨在使用混合方法开发数据收集工具的研究人员很有用。.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (chi)
目的: 旨在探讨并阐述如何在工具开发设计中实现有意义的整合。 设计: 论文讨论。 数据来源: 一项关于巴基斯坦护士教育工作者面临的挑战的混合方法研究。在整合定性阶段的研究结果后,采用了构建技术,以开发一种工具,从而确定教育工作者在学术和临床环境中教授护理学生时面临的挑战。 对护理工作的影响: 护士须使用特定于文化和人口统计的工具来收集数据。根据六步构建法,护士可采用严格且可靠的混合方法设计来开发此类工具。 结论: 在研究过程中和研究完成后,在工具开发设计中,分别采用了构建技术和合并技术。但构建技术对于利用定性研究结果开发工具至关重要。所提出的构建方法从可靠的定性数据分析开始,并通过选择关键主题和子主题,将其与受试者的引用信息联系起来,然后将引用信息转化为有意义的相关项目,从而加强构建方法。利用所提出的构建整合技术,使研究者有意义地、有效地利用定性结果,利用混合方法设计开发工具。 影响: 在开发适合研究背景并与研究受试者相关的数据收集工具方面,混合方法非常有用。在使用混合方法开发研究工具时,有关如何实现有意义的整合的指导是有限的。在本研究中,提出了一种实用的构建技术,使研究人员能够有效使用某一阶段的定性研究结果,为后续阶段开发工具。所提出的方法对旨在使用混合方法开发数据收集工具的研究人员很有用。.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32400896
doi: 10.1111/jan.14415
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2198-2207

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Bazeley, P. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). (2017). Patient-centred measurement and reporting in Canada: Launching the discussion toward a future state. Retrieved from https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/visioning-day-paper-en-web.pdf
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12165
Collins, K. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2012). Securing a place at the table: A review and extension of legitimation criteria for the conduct of mixed research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 849-865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433799
Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano-Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011) . Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from: https://obssr.od.nih.gov/training/online-training-resources/mixed-methods-research/. (Accessed 22 May 2020).
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Curry, L. A., Krumholz, H. M., O'Cathain, A., Clark, V. L. P., Cherlin, E., & Bradley, E. H. (2013). Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 6(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967885
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554-561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Halcomb, E., & Hickman, L. (2015). Mixed methods research. Nursing Standard, 29(32), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.32.41.e8858.
Hobart, J. C., Cano, S. J., Zajicek, J. P., & Thompson, A. J. (2007). Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: Problems, solutions and recommendations. The Lancet Neurology, 6(12), 1094-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70290-9
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058870
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bustamante, R. M., & Nelson, J. A. (2010). Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809355805
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Polit, D. F., & Yang, F. (2015). Measurement and the measurement of change: A primer for the health professions, Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Streiner, D., Norman, G., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2016). Nurse educator core competencies. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/nurse_educator050416.pdf
Younas, A., Parveen, S. R., & Zeb, H. (In press). Using legitimation criteria to establish rigour in sequential mixed methods research. Nurse Researcher. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2019.e1727
Younas, A., Pedersen, M., & Durante, A. (2019). Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed-methods nursing studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(2), 676-686. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14264
Younas, A., Zeb, H., Aziz, S. B., Sana, S., Albert, J. S., Khan, I. U., … Rasheed, S. P. (2019). Perceived challenges of nurse educators while teaching undergraduate nursing students in Pakistan: An exploratory mixed-methods study. Nurse Education Today, 81, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.002
Zhou, Y. (2019). A mixed methods model of scale development and validation analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 17(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1479088

Auteurs

Ahtisham Younas (A)

Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
DSW The Caregivers, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Shifa College of Nursing, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Subia Parveen Rasheed (SP)

Shifa College of Nursing, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Hussan Zeb (H)

Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital, Swat, Pakistan.
Swat College of Nursing, Swat, Pakistan.

Shahzad Inayat (S)

College of Nursing, Isra University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Classifications MeSH