Comparison of bupivacaine alone and in a combination with lidocaine for caudal block in patients undergoing circumcision: A historical cohort study.
Journal
Turkish journal of urology
ISSN: 2149-3235
Titre abrégé: Turk J Urol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101643563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
15
09
2019
accepted:
04
11
2019
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
14
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Optimal analgesia following ambulatory surgery is an important matter in patient satisfaction, and it reduces unnecessary hospital admissions. This study investigated whether a caudal block with bupivacaine alone or in a combination with lidocaine can alter postoperative pain scores, complications, and peroperative and postoperative analgesic consumption. This is a retrospective study that included children who underwent elective circumcision surgery under general anesthesia and caudal analgesia between January and June 2018. Among the 103 children, 17 cases were not analyzed due to an unsuccessful caudal block and procedures simultaneously underwent another operation unrelated to circumcision. We divided the study participants into two groups according to the type of local anesthetic applied: 0.5 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) and 0.5 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mg/kg 1% lidocaine (Group BL) caudally. Pain scores were similar between these groups and remained in the mild-to-moderate range throughout the hospitalization (p>0.05). There were significant differences regarding the rescue analgesic use, first micturition, and mobilization times (p<0.001). In addition, we applied the multivariable logistic regression for fentanyl consumption adjusted for first mobilization and micturition time, unlike mobilization, a significantly increased risk for postoperative delayed micturition (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0-1.12; p=0.038) was found with intra-operative intravenous fentanyl use. Our results suggest that the caudal block with a lidocaine+bupivacaine combination decreases rescue analgesic consumption at day-case surgery. In circumcision procedures, the caudal block is an effective and safe analgesic method for intraoperative and postoperative pain control with no side effects. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrals.gov, NCT03911648.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32401707
pii: tud.2019.19191
doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19191
pmc: PMC7219969
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03911648']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
243-248Références
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Jun;17(6):520-33
pubmed: 17498013
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Apr;52(4):561-5
pubmed: 18339162
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012 Fall;50(4):83-95
pubmed: 23047448
Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jul;83(1):91-103
pubmed: 10616337
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Oct;30(5):613-620
pubmed: 28786855
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 6;7(9):e016225
pubmed: 28882914
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Mar;26(3):275-85
pubmed: 10823383
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015 Summer;23(2):87-90
pubmed: 26090348
Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1147-51
pubmed: 11682384
Anaesthesia. 2001 May;56(5):470-6
pubmed: 11350336
Agri. 2008 Apr;20(2):31-6
pubmed: 19021008
Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(1):87-99
pubmed: 10602250
Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;23(4):789-814, x
pubmed: 16310664
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1139-57
pubmed: 19352147
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 May;32(5):289-97
pubmed: 25693139
Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1353-64
pubmed: 22696610
Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 May;14(5):398-402
pubmed: 15086851
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1643-58
pubmed: 18499593
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):151-6
pubmed: 25393589
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;60(4):355-63
pubmed: 23296493
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Dec;20(12):1061-9
pubmed: 21199114