Incidence of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescriptions in Kidney Transplant Recipients in Ontario, Canada.


Journal

Transplantation proceedings
ISSN: 1873-2623
Titre abrégé: Transplant Proc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0243532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 26 09 2019
revised: 16 02 2020
accepted: 23 02 2020
pubmed: 14 5 2020
medline: 24 2 2021
entrez: 14 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are routinely excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials. Given the lack of safety and efficacy data in this population, we examined real-world prescribing practices of DOACs in KTRs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data sets in Ontario, Canada. All adult KTRs (n = 5580) from June 23, 2009, to March 31, 2017, were included. The primary outcomes were the first prescription for a DOAC or warfarin. Patients were censored on graft failure, death, or end of follow-up. The mean age was 55 (SD, 14) years; 63% were male, and 65% had received a deceased donor kidney. Over a median follow-up of 5.5 and 4.7 years, 224 KTRs (4.0%) and 824 KTRs (14.8%) were prescribed DOACs and warfarin, respectively. The rates of DOAC and warfarin prescriptions were 8.1 and 32.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Older age, receipt of a kidney transplant in more recent years, and higher baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate were associated with DOAC prescription compared with warfarin. Patients with multiple comorbidities and a history of deep venous thromboembolism had a lower risk of DOAC prescription compared with warfarin. When examined by era, the incidence rate of both DOAC and warfarin prescriptions increased significantly over time. Despite limited safety and efficacy data, DOACs are prescribed to KTRs. However, warfarin still remains more commonly prescribed in this selected patient population. Anticoagulant prescriptions overall are on the rise in KTRs. Further study is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of DOACs in KTRs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are routinely excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials. Given the lack of safety and efficacy data in this population, we examined real-world prescribing practices of DOACs in KTRs.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data sets in Ontario, Canada. All adult KTRs (n = 5580) from June 23, 2009, to March 31, 2017, were included. The primary outcomes were the first prescription for a DOAC or warfarin. Patients were censored on graft failure, death, or end of follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean age was 55 (SD, 14) years; 63% were male, and 65% had received a deceased donor kidney. Over a median follow-up of 5.5 and 4.7 years, 224 KTRs (4.0%) and 824 KTRs (14.8%) were prescribed DOACs and warfarin, respectively. The rates of DOAC and warfarin prescriptions were 8.1 and 32.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Older age, receipt of a kidney transplant in more recent years, and higher baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate were associated with DOAC prescription compared with warfarin. Patients with multiple comorbidities and a history of deep venous thromboembolism had a lower risk of DOAC prescription compared with warfarin. When examined by era, the incidence rate of both DOAC and warfarin prescriptions increased significantly over time.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Despite limited safety and efficacy data, DOACs are prescribed to KTRs. However, warfarin still remains more commonly prescribed in this selected patient population. Anticoagulant prescriptions overall are on the rise in KTRs. Further study is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of DOACs in KTRs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32402459
pii: S0041-1345(19)31332-6
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.171
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anticoagulants 0
Antithrombins 0
Warfarin 5Q7ZVV76EI

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3144-3152

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mohammed Somaili (M)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Nivethika Jeyakumar (N)

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Eric McArthur (E)

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Christine Ribic (C)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Manish M Sood (MM)

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Ziv Harel (Z)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Amber O Molnar (AO)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: amolnar@stjosham.on.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH