Relevance of biomarkers across different neurodegenerative diseases.
Alzheimer’s disease
Amyloid
Biomarkers
Cerebrospinal fluid
Magnetic resonance imaging
Neurodegenerative diseases
Neurofilament light chain
Plasma biomarkers
Positron emission tomography
Tau
Journal
Alzheimer's research & therapy
ISSN: 1758-9193
Titre abrégé: Alzheimers Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101511643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 05 2020
13 05 2020
Historique:
received:
08
11
2019
accepted:
16
03
2020
entrez:
15
5
2020
pubmed:
15
5
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The panel of fluid- and imaging-based biomarkers available for neurodegenerative disease research is growing and has the potential to close important gaps in research and the clinic. With this growth and increasing use, appropriate implementation and interpretation are paramount. Various biomarkers feature nuanced differences in strengths, limitations, and biases that must be considered when investigating disease etiology and clinical utility. For example, neuropathological investigations of Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis can fall in disagreement with conclusions reached by biomarker-based investigations. Considering the varied strengths, limitations, and biases of different research methodologies and approaches may help harmonize disciplines within the neurodegenerative disease field. Along with separate review articles covering fluid and imaging biomarkers in this issue of Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, we present the result of a discussion from the 2019 Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases course at the University College London. Here, we discuss themes of biomarker use in neurodegenerative disease research, commenting on appropriate use, interpretation, and considerations for implementation across different neurodegenerative diseases. We also draw attention to areas where biomarker use can be combined with other disciplines to understand issues of pathophysiology and etiology underlying dementia. Lastly, we highlight novel modalities that have been proposed in the landscape of neurodegenerative disease research and care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The panel of fluid- and imaging-based biomarkers available for neurodegenerative disease research is growing and has the potential to close important gaps in research and the clinic. With this growth and increasing use, appropriate implementation and interpretation are paramount. Various biomarkers feature nuanced differences in strengths, limitations, and biases that must be considered when investigating disease etiology and clinical utility. For example, neuropathological investigations of Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis can fall in disagreement with conclusions reached by biomarker-based investigations. Considering the varied strengths, limitations, and biases of different research methodologies and approaches may help harmonize disciplines within the neurodegenerative disease field.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Along with separate review articles covering fluid and imaging biomarkers in this issue of Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, we present the result of a discussion from the 2019 Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases course at the University College London. Here, we discuss themes of biomarker use in neurodegenerative disease research, commenting on appropriate use, interpretation, and considerations for implementation across different neurodegenerative diseases. We also draw attention to areas where biomarker use can be combined with other disciplines to understand issues of pathophysiology and etiology underlying dementia. Lastly, we highlight novel modalities that have been proposed in the landscape of neurodegenerative disease research and care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32404143
doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00601-w
pii: 10.1186/s13195-020-00601-w
pmc: PMC7222479
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Biomarkers
0
tau Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
56Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K24 AG053435
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS100717
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG023501
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Brain Pathol. 2016 May;26(3):371-86
pubmed: 26193084
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Feb 23;10:232-236
pubmed: 29780868
Anal Chem. 2016 Mar 1;88(5):2755-62
pubmed: 26828829
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2673-2734
pubmed: 28735855
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011 Nov;70(11):960-9
pubmed: 22002422
Neurology. 2019 Oct 22;93(17):e1647-e1659
pubmed: 31371569
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 06;5(2):eaau7220
pubmed: 30775436
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1286-1294
pubmed: 30938796
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):535-562
pubmed: 29653606
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Jul 28;10(1):71
pubmed: 30055655
EMBO Mol Med. 2018 May;10(5):
pubmed: 29626112
Neurology. 2003 May 13;60(9):1495-500
pubmed: 12743238
Nature. 1989 Mar 23;338(6213):342-5
pubmed: 2564168
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019 Jan 9;7(1):5
pubmed: 30626432
F1000Res. 2017 Nov 27;6:2053
pubmed: 29225787
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 7;39(32):6315-6324
pubmed: 31209175
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013 Aug 14;5(4):36
pubmed: 23953396
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Jan;37:74-81
pubmed: 26545633
Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59
pubmed: 1759558
Cell Tissue Res. 2004 Oct;318(1):121-34
pubmed: 15338272
Ann Neurol. 2019 Feb;85(2):229-240
pubmed: 30597624
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Mar;16(3):561-571
pubmed: 31784374
Euro Surveill. 2017 Oct;22(41):
pubmed: 29043964
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Mar;13(3):236-246
pubmed: 27513978
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015 Dec;41(7):858-81
pubmed: 26041104
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Jun 6;19(7):45
pubmed: 31172290
Mov Disord. 2012 Aug;27(9):1083-91
pubmed: 22692795
J Mol Neurosci. 2011 Nov;45(3):402-8
pubmed: 21603977
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jul;12(7):637-49
pubmed: 23664844
Neuron. 2009 Apr 16;62(1):42-52
pubmed: 19376066
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019 Jun;97:18-33
pubmed: 30529601
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Feb;15(2):205-216
pubmed: 30347188
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Oct 30;10(1):112
pubmed: 30376881
Cell Tissue Bank. 2007;8(2):151-62
pubmed: 17075689
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Oct 1;28(10):3638-3649
pubmed: 29028937
JAMA Neurol. 2018 May 1;75(5):548-556
pubmed: 29435558
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jun 1;157(11):1015-22
pubmed: 12777365
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 Jun 1;8(6):
pubmed: 28213435
Brain. 2016 May;139(Pt 5):1539-50
pubmed: 26936940
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):207-16
pubmed: 23332364
Sci Rep. 2016 May 31;6:26801
pubmed: 27241045
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979 Jun;3(3):299-308
pubmed: 438372
Science. 1987 Feb 20;235(4791):880-4
pubmed: 2949367
Neurology. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):384-6
pubmed: 17082464
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Aug;13(8):457-476
pubmed: 28708131
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):795-804
pubmed: 22784036
Brain. 2018 Jul 1;141(7):2181-2193
pubmed: 29878075
Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Jul;114(1):5-22
pubmed: 17579875
Brain Pathol. 2016 Nov;26(6):726-740
pubmed: 27529157
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):860-875
pubmed: 29630712
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;90(9):1011-1020
pubmed: 30760643
Brain. 2014 Sep;137(Pt 9):2564-77
pubmed: 25012224
Nat Genet. 1993 Aug;4(4):387-92
pubmed: 8401587
J Mol Neurosci. 2011 Nov;45(3):330-5
pubmed: 21584654
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jan 1;12(524):
pubmed: 31894103
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(7):419-427
pubmed: 31222062
J Biomed Sci. 2019 May 9;26(1):33
pubmed: 31072403
Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):2113-2126
pubmed: 31157360
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(1):115-126
pubmed: 30223398
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1985 Nov;44(6):559-77
pubmed: 2932539
Free Radic Biol Med. 2011 Oct 1;51(7):1302-19
pubmed: 21782935
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jan;66(1):150-156
pubmed: 29355911
J Neurol Sci. 2010 Feb 15;289(1-2):128-34
pubmed: 19729174
Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcz046
pubmed: 32051933
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Jun;28(6):595-9
pubmed: 20495550
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):249-254
pubmed: 29420472
J Nucl Med. 2007 Jun;48(6):932-45
pubmed: 17504879
Neurology. 2016 Sep 13;87(11):1093-101
pubmed: 27534714
Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):971-83
pubmed: 8458085
Ann Neurol. 2012 Dec;72(6):893-901
pubmed: 23071076
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Dec;71(12):1520-8
pubmed: 25322077
J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):643-663
pubmed: 30051512
Brain. 2019 Jan 1;142(1):193-208
pubmed: 30508042
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):281-282
pubmed: 29255907
J Exp Med. 2008 Aug 4;205(8):1869-77
pubmed: 18625748
Biomark Med. 2018 Jul;12(7):799-812
pubmed: 29902934
Ann Neurol. 2018 Nov;84(5):648-658
pubmed: 30196548
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Oct 17;9(1):86
pubmed: 29041968
JAMA Neurol. 2017 May 1;74(5):557-566
pubmed: 28346578
Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 26;6:e719
pubmed: 26812040
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Jan;123(1):1-11
pubmed: 22101365
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Aug;13(8):841-849
pubmed: 28734653
Neurology. 2016 May 3;86(18):1736-43
pubmed: 27037234
Brain. 2019 Sep 1;142(9):2558-2571
pubmed: 31327002
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Mar 28;1:10
pubmed: 31304295
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2017 Aug;43(5):393-408
pubmed: 28117917
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2010 Dec;23(4):213-27
pubmed: 21045163
Neurology. 2002 Jun 25;58(12):1791-800
pubmed: 12084879
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Jan;15(1):1-7
pubmed: 30195482
NeuroRx. 2004 Apr;1(2):255-62
pubmed: 15717026
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:448-463
pubmed: 28587897