COVID-19 and assisted reproductive technology services: repercussions for patients and proposal for individualized clinical management.
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus
Coronavirus Infections
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Infertility, Female
/ therapy
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
Pregnancy
Reproductive Health Services
/ organization & administration
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
SARS-CoV-2
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
Assisted reproductive technology
COVID-19
In vitro fertilization
Infertility
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Poseidon criteria
Viewpoint
Journal
Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E
ISSN: 1477-7827
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153627
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 May 2020
13 May 2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
accepted:
28
04
2020
entrez:
15
5
2020
pubmed:
15
5
2020
medline:
19
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prolonged lockdown of health services providing high-complexity fertility treatments -as currently recommended by many reproductive medicine entities- is detrimental for society as a whole, and infertility patients in particular. Globally, approximately 0.3% of all infants born every year are conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments. By contrast, the total number of COVID-19 deaths reported so far represents approximately 1.0% of the total deaths expected to occur worldwide over the first three months of the current year. It seems, therefore, that the number of infants expected to be conceived and born -but who will not be so due to the lockdown of infertility services- might be as significant as the total number of deaths attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. We herein propose remedies that include a prognostic-stratification of more vulnerable infertility cases in order to plan a progressive restart of worldwide fertility treatments. At a time when preventing complications and limiting burdens for national health systems represent relevant issues, our viewpoint might help competent authorities and health care providers to identify patients who should be prioritized for the continuation of fertility care in a safe environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32404170
doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00605-z
pii: 10.1186/s12958-020-00605-z
pmc: PMC7218705
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45Références
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 11;10:614
pubmed: 31572298
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 27;10:387
pubmed: 31316461
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019 Apr 30;13:1179558119845865
pubmed: 31068758
Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2020 Jun;57(1):e100
pubmed: 32302069
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):809-815
pubmed: 32151335
Panminerva Med. 2019 Mar;61(1):3-10
pubmed: 29962186
Panminerva Med. 2019 Mar;61(1):24-29
pubmed: 30021418
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3
pubmed: 26921622
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Sep;18(9):841-852
pubmed: 31238745
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Nov;46(11):1634-40
pubmed: 17623748
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 19;10:642
pubmed: 31608011
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Nov 20;10:814
pubmed: 31824427
Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1224-31
pubmed: 24094423
Fertil Steril. 2018 Nov;110(6):1067-1080
pubmed: 30396551
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):633-4
pubmed: 24559617
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May;992:99-106
pubmed: 12794050
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):559-564
pubmed: 32220284
F1000Res. 2016 Dec 23;5:2911
pubmed: 28232864
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 24;10:917
pubmed: 32038484
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1101-1102
pubmed: 32247384
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Feb 28;10:99
pubmed: 30873117
Fertil Steril. 2020 May;113(5):920-922
pubmed: 32222253
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 May;48(5):521-526
pubmed: 32303420
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Nov;36(11):2207-2215
pubmed: 31440958
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Sep;6(3):429-434
pubmed: 28686476