Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bunion
Foot deformity
Hallux valgus
Minimally invasive surgery
Osteotomy
Percutaneous surgery
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
26
02
2020
revised:
14
04
2020
accepted:
14
04
2020
entrez:
15
5
2020
pubmed:
15
5
2020
medline:
15
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numerous publications of the late 20th century have presented the radiological outcome of open technique for distal metatarsal osteotomy for mild to moderate hallux valgus and the clinical outcomes by means of well-established scoring systems which have been published and make these open techniques today's benchmark and gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures reduce surgical trauma because they are performed without large incisions, and injury to the soft tissues is limited. This has the theoretical advantages of improved recovery and decreased rehabilitation times. There is however limited literature to prove the same for minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus.Our aim was thus to pool all available comparative literature on minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery done for mild to moderate hallux valgus versus open surgical approaches. A PubMed, Embase and Scopus search was performed using the keywords ('hallux valgus' OR bunion) AND ('minimally invasive' OR percutaneous) AND osteotomy. A total of 473 records were identified and out of which nine studies were included in the final review. Most available studies are either randomized control trials, or prospective cohort studies providing good level of evidence. Radiological analysis showed similar correction with both MIS and open osteotomies. In functional analysis results were different with open techniques providing better results in terms of AOFAS score. (p < 0.0001). VAS score and complication rate were similar in both groups. We conclude that based on available literature MIS provides equivalent radiological outcomes with respect to open surgery but functionally despite the promising results (good to excellent in most series), the outcomes in terms of function are not as good as open surgery. MIS techniques provide satisfactory outcomes for mild-to-moderate severity of hallux valgus though not as good as open surgery. There is evolving literature for this relatively new procedure. Longer duration of follow up and bigger numbers would allow for more meaningful data analysis and conclusions to be drawn as more studies come forward.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Numerous publications of the late 20th century have presented the radiological outcome of open technique for distal metatarsal osteotomy for mild to moderate hallux valgus and the clinical outcomes by means of well-established scoring systems which have been published and make these open techniques today's benchmark and gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures reduce surgical trauma because they are performed without large incisions, and injury to the soft tissues is limited. This has the theoretical advantages of improved recovery and decreased rehabilitation times. There is however limited literature to prove the same for minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus.Our aim was thus to pool all available comparative literature on minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery done for mild to moderate hallux valgus versus open surgical approaches.
METHODS
METHODS
A PubMed, Embase and Scopus search was performed using the keywords ('hallux valgus' OR bunion) AND ('minimally invasive' OR percutaneous) AND osteotomy. A total of 473 records were identified and out of which nine studies were included in the final review.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Most available studies are either randomized control trials, or prospective cohort studies providing good level of evidence. Radiological analysis showed similar correction with both MIS and open osteotomies. In functional analysis results were different with open techniques providing better results in terms of AOFAS score. (p < 0.0001). VAS score and complication rate were similar in both groups.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that based on available literature MIS provides equivalent radiological outcomes with respect to open surgery but functionally despite the promising results (good to excellent in most series), the outcomes in terms of function are not as good as open surgery. MIS techniques provide satisfactory outcomes for mild-to-moderate severity of hallux valgus though not as good as open surgery. There is evolving literature for this relatively new procedure. Longer duration of follow up and bigger numbers would allow for more meaningful data analysis and conclusions to be drawn as more studies come forward.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32405192
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.04.016
pii: S0976-5662(20)30130-2
pmc: PMC7211908
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
348-356Informations de copyright
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Br Med Bull. 2011;97:149-67
pubmed: 20710024
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Sep - Oct;57(5):948-951
pubmed: 30001939
Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Mar;21(1):37-41
pubmed: 25682405
Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):343-350
pubmed: 29869014
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Apr;28(4):527-8
pubmed: 17475154
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):311-317
pubmed: 29241361
Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10):2115-21
pubmed: 25128969
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Feb;26(2):122-7
pubmed: 15737253
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1197-1204
pubmed: 27381179
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Aug;102(2):111-117
pubmed: 29081030
Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul;15(7):349-53
pubmed: 7951968
Orthop Clin North Am. 2009 Oct;40(4):515-24, ix-x
pubmed: 19773057
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 May - Jun;56(3):445-452
pubmed: 28237566
Foot Ankle Clin. 2014 Jun;19(2):181-9
pubmed: 24878408
J Med Life. 2015;8 Spec Issue:87-93
pubmed: 26361518
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jul;28(7):759-77
pubmed: 17666168
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Nov;132(11):1539-46
pubmed: 22821414
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2305-11
pubmed: 23494184
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Dec;30(12):1154-60
pubmed: 20003873
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Dec;34(12):1645-53
pubmed: 24216284
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Aug;101(2):167-172
pubmed: 28168637
Foot Ankle Spec. 2013 Dec;6(6):409-16
pubmed: 24154993
Bone Joint J. 2013 May;95-B(5):649-56
pubmed: 23632675