Review of safety and minimum pricing of nitazoxanide for potential treatment of COVID-19.
Journal
Journal of virus eradication
ISSN: 2055-6640
Titre abrégé: J Virus Erad
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101654142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2020
30 Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
15
5
2020
pubmed:
15
5
2020
medline:
15
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many treatments are being assessed for repurposing to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). One drug that has shown promising results A review of nitazoxanide clinical research was conducted using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov. We searched for phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nitazoxanide with placebo or active control for 5-14 days in participants experiencing acute infections of any kind. Data extracted were grade 1-4 and serious adverse events (AEs). Data were also extracted on gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, as well as hepatorenal and cardiovascular effects.Active pharmaceutical ingredient cost data from 2016 to 2019 were extracted from the Panjiva database and adjusted for 5% loss during production, costs of excipients, formulation, a 10% profit margin and tax. Two dosages, at 500 mg BD and a higher dose of 1100 mg three times daily (TDS), were considered. Our estimated costs were compared with publicly available list prices from a selection of countries. Nine RCTs of nitazoxanide were identified for inclusion. These RCTs accounted for 1514 participants and an estimated 95.3 person-years-of-follow-up. No significant differences were found in any of the AE endpoints assessed, across all trials or on subgroup analyses of active- or placebo-controlled trials. Mild GI AEs increased with dose. No hepatorenal or cardiovascular concerns were raised, but few appropriate metrics were reported. There were no teratogenic concerns, but the evidence base was very limited.Based on a weighted-mean cost of US $61/kg, a 14-day course of treatment with nitazoxanide 500 mg BD would cost $1.41. The daily cost would therefore be $0.10. The same 14-day course could cost $3944 in US commercial pharmacies, and $3 per course in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. At a higher dose of 1100 mg TDS, our estimated cost was $4.08 per 14-day course, equivalent to $0.29 per day. Nitazoxanide demonstrates a good safety profile at approved doses. However, further evidence is required regarding hepatorenal and cardiovascular effects, as well as teratogenicity. We estimate that it would be possible to manufacture nitazoxanide as generic for $1.41 for a 14-day treatment course at 500 mg BD, up to $4.08 at 1100 mg TDS. Further trials in COVID-19 patients should be initiated. If efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated in clinical studies, nitazoxanide may represent a safe and affordable treatment in the ongoing pandemic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many treatments are being assessed for repurposing to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). One drug that has shown promising results
METHODS
METHODS
A review of nitazoxanide clinical research was conducted using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov. We searched for phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nitazoxanide with placebo or active control for 5-14 days in participants experiencing acute infections of any kind. Data extracted were grade 1-4 and serious adverse events (AEs). Data were also extracted on gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, as well as hepatorenal and cardiovascular effects.Active pharmaceutical ingredient cost data from 2016 to 2019 were extracted from the Panjiva database and adjusted for 5% loss during production, costs of excipients, formulation, a 10% profit margin and tax. Two dosages, at 500 mg BD and a higher dose of 1100 mg three times daily (TDS), were considered. Our estimated costs were compared with publicly available list prices from a selection of countries.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nine RCTs of nitazoxanide were identified for inclusion. These RCTs accounted for 1514 participants and an estimated 95.3 person-years-of-follow-up. No significant differences were found in any of the AE endpoints assessed, across all trials or on subgroup analyses of active- or placebo-controlled trials. Mild GI AEs increased with dose. No hepatorenal or cardiovascular concerns were raised, but few appropriate metrics were reported. There were no teratogenic concerns, but the evidence base was very limited.Based on a weighted-mean cost of US $61/kg, a 14-day course of treatment with nitazoxanide 500 mg BD would cost $1.41. The daily cost would therefore be $0.10. The same 14-day course could cost $3944 in US commercial pharmacies, and $3 per course in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. At a higher dose of 1100 mg TDS, our estimated cost was $4.08 per 14-day course, equivalent to $0.29 per day.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Nitazoxanide demonstrates a good safety profile at approved doses. However, further evidence is required regarding hepatorenal and cardiovascular effects, as well as teratogenicity. We estimate that it would be possible to manufacture nitazoxanide as generic for $1.41 for a 14-day treatment course at 500 mg BD, up to $4.08 at 1100 mg TDS. Further trials in COVID-19 patients should be initiated. If efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated in clinical studies, nitazoxanide may represent a safe and affordable treatment in the ongoing pandemic.
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Pagination
52-60Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Virus Eradication published by Mediscript Ltd.
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 14;41(19):1858
pubmed: 32227120
J Virus Erad. 2020 Apr 30;6(2):61-69
pubmed: 32405423
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(11):1903-1911
pubmed: 30753384
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;14(7):609-18
pubmed: 24852376
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 28;100(16):1205-1208
pubmed: 32145717
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jan;17(2):265-70
pubmed: 12534412
Circulation. 2020 May 19;141(20):1648-1655
pubmed: 32200663
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Aug 15;43(4):421-7
pubmed: 16838229
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Oct;101(10):1025-31
pubmed: 17658567
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 May;40(5):213-20
pubmed: 12051573
Cell Res. 2020 Mar;30(3):269-271
pubmed: 32020029
J Virus Erad. 2016 Jan 01;2(1):28-31
pubmed: 27482432
Infect Chemother. 2020 Mar;52(1):110-112
pubmed: 32153144
J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;54(9):987-94
pubmed: 24691901
Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;120(5):876-878
pubmed: 32246450
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 May;40(5):221-7
pubmed: 12051574
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1421-1424
pubmed: 32271988
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5):
pubmed: 32071052
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):791-796
pubmed: 32181911
iScience. 2019 Sep 27;19:1279-1290
pubmed: 31402258
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):846-848
pubmed: 32125452
J Infect Public Health. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):227-30
pubmed: 27095301
J Biol Chem. 2009 Oct 23;284(43):29798-808
pubmed: 19638339
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May 21;:
pubmed: 32438446
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 15;48(4):e41-6
pubmed: 19133801
Helicobacter. 2017 Oct;22(5):
pubmed: 28524341
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):928-36
pubmed: 24399087
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jan 29;3(1):e000571
pubmed: 29564159
Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):1144-1145
pubmed: 32198152
JAMA. 2020 Apr 13;:
pubmed: 32282022
Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1438-40
pubmed: 11356471
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 May;17(5):259-260
pubmed: 32139904