Predictive Modeling to Determine Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.


Journal

The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 15 5 2020
medline: 11 11 2020
entrez: 15 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic surgical procedures; however, patient-reported outcomes have varied greatly in the literature. To identify preoperative factors that affect outcomes and to develop prognostic tools for predicting functional outcomes in future ARCR cases. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients were included who underwent ARCR for repairable full-thickness rotator cuff tears with at least 2 years of follow-up. Twelve predictors were entered as candidate predictors in each model: age, sex, workers' compensation (WC) status, previous cuff repair, tear size, tear shape, multiple-tendon involvement, tendon stump length, Goutallier classification, critical shoulder angle, length of follow-up, and baseline subjective outcomes score. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and patient satisfaction were each modeled through proportional odds ordinal logistic regression. Model results were presented with marginal covariate effect plots and predictive nomograms. Overall, 552 shoulders fit inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 60.2 years (range, 23-81 years). Twenty-five (4.5%) shoulders underwent revision cuff repair or reverse arthroplasty at a mean 1.9 years (range, 0.1-7.9 years) postoperatively. Overall, 509 shoulders were eligible for follow-up, and minimum 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes were obtained for 449 (88.2%) at a mean 4.8 years (range, 2-11 years). The ASES score demonstrated significant improvement from pre- to postoperative median (interquartile range): 58 (44.9-71.6) to 98.3 (89.9-100; Excellent clinical outcomes and low failure rates were obtained after ARCR by using careful patient selection and modern surgical techniques for ARCR. Female sex, WC claim, and previous ARCR were significant predictors of poorer outcomes in at least 3 patient-reported outcome models. Prognostic nomograms were developed to aid in future patient selection, clinical decision making, and patient education.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic surgical procedures; however, patient-reported outcomes have varied greatly in the literature.
PURPOSE
To identify preoperative factors that affect outcomes and to develop prognostic tools for predicting functional outcomes in future ARCR cases.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
Patients were included who underwent ARCR for repairable full-thickness rotator cuff tears with at least 2 years of follow-up. Twelve predictors were entered as candidate predictors in each model: age, sex, workers' compensation (WC) status, previous cuff repair, tear size, tear shape, multiple-tendon involvement, tendon stump length, Goutallier classification, critical shoulder angle, length of follow-up, and baseline subjective outcomes score. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and patient satisfaction were each modeled through proportional odds ordinal logistic regression. Model results were presented with marginal covariate effect plots and predictive nomograms.
RESULTS
Overall, 552 shoulders fit inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 60.2 years (range, 23-81 years). Twenty-five (4.5%) shoulders underwent revision cuff repair or reverse arthroplasty at a mean 1.9 years (range, 0.1-7.9 years) postoperatively. Overall, 509 shoulders were eligible for follow-up, and minimum 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes were obtained for 449 (88.2%) at a mean 4.8 years (range, 2-11 years). The ASES score demonstrated significant improvement from pre- to postoperative median (interquartile range): 58 (44.9-71.6) to 98.3 (89.9-100;
CONCLUSION
Excellent clinical outcomes and low failure rates were obtained after ARCR by using careful patient selection and modern surgical techniques for ARCR. Female sex, WC claim, and previous ARCR were significant predictors of poorer outcomes in at least 3 patient-reported outcome models. Prognostic nomograms were developed to aid in future patient selection, clinical decision making, and patient education.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32406765
doi: 10.1177/0363546520914632
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1559-1567

Auteurs

Salvatore Frangiamore (S)

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Grant J Dornan (GJ)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Marilee P Horan (MP)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Sandeep Mannava (S)

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Erik M Fritz (EM)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Zaamin B Hussain (ZB)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Gilbert Moatshe (G)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Jonathan A Godin (JA)

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Jonas Pogorzelski (J)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Peter J Millett (PJ)

The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Center for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Vail, Colorado, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH