High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Infection Among Adult Patients at Four Urban Emergency Departments - Birmingham, Oakland, Baltimore, and Boston, 2015-2017.


Journal

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report
ISSN: 1545-861X
Titre abrégé: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802429

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2020
Historique:
entrez: 15 5 2020
pubmed: 15 5 2020
medline: 16 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Identifying persons with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become an urgent public health challenge because of increasing HCV-related morbidity and mortality, low rates of awareness among infected persons, and the advent of curative therapies (1). Since 2012, CDC has recommended testing of all persons born during 1945-1965 (baby boomers) for identification of chronic HCV infection (1); urban emergency departments (EDs) are well positioned venues for detecting HCV infection among these persons. The United States has witnessed an unprecedented opioid overdose epidemic since 2013 that derives primarily from commonly injected illicit opioids (e.g., heroin and fentanyl) (2). This injection drug use behavior has led to an increase in HCV infections among persons who inject drugs and heightened concern about increases in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV infection within communities disproportionately affected by the opioid crisis (3,4). However, targeted strategies for identifying HCV infection among persons who inject drugs is challenging (5,6). During 2015-2016, EDs at the University of Alabama at Birmingham; Highland Hospital, Oakland, California; Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; and Boston University Medical Center, Massachusetts, adopted opt-out (i.e., patients can implicitly accept or explicitly decline testing), universal hepatitis C screening for all adult patients. ED staff members offered HCV antibody (anti-HCV) screening to patients who were unaware of their status.* During similar observation periods at each site, ED staff members tested 14,252 patients and identified an overall 9.2% prevalence of positive results for anti-HCV among the adult patient population. Among the 1945-1965 birth cohort, prevalence of positive results for anti-HCV (13.9%) was significantly higher among non-Hispanic blacks (blacks) (16.0%) than among non-Hispanic whites (whites) (12.2%) (p<0.001). Among persons born after 1965, overall prevalence of positive results for anti-HCV was 6.7% and was significantly higher among whites (15.3%) than among blacks (3.2%) (p<0.001). These findings highlight age-associated differences in racial/ethnic prevalences and the potential for ED venues and opt-out, universal testing strategies to improve HCV infection awareness and surveillance for hard-to-reach populations. This opt-out, universal testing approach is supported by new recommendations for hepatitis C screening at least once in a lifetime for all adults aged ≥18 years, except in settings where the prevalence of positive results for HCV infection is <0.1% (7).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32407307
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919a1
pmc: PMC7238951
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

569-574

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Ricardo Franco reports grants and personal fees from Gilead during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Abbvie and grants from Merck outside the submitted work. James Galbraith reports grants from Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work. Yu-Hsiang Hsieh reports grants from Gilead Sciences HIV FOCUS program during the conduct of the study. Elissa Schechter-Perkins reports grants from Gilead Sciences during the conduct of the study. Joel Rodgers reports grants from Gilead Sciences during the conduct of the study. Richard Rothman reports grants from Gilead FOCUS during the conduct of the study. Douglas White reports grants from Gilead Sciences during the conduct of the study. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Références

Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;67(1):119-28
pubmed: 26253712
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 15;59(10):1411-9
pubmed: 25114031
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 04;67(5152):1419-1427
pubmed: 30605448
R I Med J (2013). 2014 Jul 01;97(7):35-9
pubmed: 24983020
Hepatology. 2015 Mar;61(3):776-82
pubmed: 25179527
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Aug 17;61(RR-4):1-32
pubmed: 22895429
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(2):1-17
pubmed: 32271723
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186371
pubmed: 30646319
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62(9):1059-65
pubmed: 26908800
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Nov 1;73(3):323-331
pubmed: 27763996

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH