Low-Dose Erlotinib Treatment in Elderly or Frail Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents
/ adverse effects
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Erlotinib Hydrochloride
/ adverse effects
Female
Frail Elderly
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
15
5
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
15
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is well established, optimal dosing remains to be established, especially in elderly or frail patients. To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose erlotinib in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Single-arm phase 2 trial with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 2-stage design that enrolled frail patients from 21 Japanese institutions after meeting the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who were considered frail based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were eligible for the study. Patients were initially administered 50 mg/d erlotinib for 4 weeks, which was modified based on response or adverse events. Dose increase was permitted for patients with stable disease after 4 weeks. The primary end point was the independent review committee-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) at the dose of 50 mg/d. The study also evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. Eighty patients were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 80 (49-90) years; 54 (68%) were men. An independent review committee confirmed a significant ORR of 60.0% (90% CI, 50.2%-69.2%). The disease control rate was 90.0% (90% CI, 82.7%-94.9%), median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.4 months), and median overall survival was 26.2 months (95% CI, 21.9-30.4 months). Mild adverse events were observed in some participants, with few patients exhibiting grade 3 or greater adverse events. Low-dose erlotinib treatment was temporarily suspended for 10 patients owing to adverse events. Five of 80 patients (6%) had their erlotinib dose reduced to 25 mg because of oral mucositis, paronychia, erythema multiforme, diarrhea, and anorexia. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (cutaneous ulcer and bone infection, and oral mucositis, respectively). There were no cases of interstitial lung disease or treatment-related deaths. The median (range) erlotinib plasma concentration was measured at 685 (153-1950) ng/mL. Seventy-three patients discontinued study treatment owing to disease progression (n = 60), death (n = 3), AEs (n = 4), and patient requests (n = 6). No clear association was observed between the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and the treatment outcome. Low-dose erlotinib appears to be safe and effective in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer and can be a valid treatment option. UMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000015949.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32407455
pii: 2765756
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1250
pmc: PMC7226294
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Erlotinib Hydrochloride
DA87705X9K
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e201250Références
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2758-65
pubmed: 19403886
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1394-400
pubmed: 19224850
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125
pubmed: 29151359
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34
pubmed: 23816960
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jul 1;19(13):3267-79
pubmed: 11432895
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2740-2747
pubmed: 29723397
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2326-2347
pubmed: 29782209
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;35(31):3575-3581
pubmed: 28872925
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;76(1):155-61
pubmed: 26003540
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 10;36(14):1389-1395
pubmed: 29590007
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1091-1101
pubmed: 25403592
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8
pubmed: 20573926
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3248-57
pubmed: 27022112
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Sep;7(9):1417-22
pubmed: 22895139
Lung Cancer. 2018 Dec;126:41-47
pubmed: 30527191
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1904-10
pubmed: 26174465
Cancer. 1997 Oct 1;80(7):1302-10
pubmed: 9317183
Pharmacogenomics. 2012 Apr;13(5):615-24
pubmed: 22462752
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245-51
pubmed: 7722560
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Aug;20(8):1070-1082
pubmed: 31262657