Evaluation of the Performance of a Point-of-Care Test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2020
Historique:
entrez: 15 5 2020
pubmed: 15 5 2020
medline: 27 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Rates of chlamydial and gonococcal infection continue to increase in the United States, as do the associated costs of untreated infections. Improved diagnostic technologies that support testing and treating in 1 clinical visit are critical to advancing efforts to control the rates of chlamydial and gonococcal infection. To evaluate the clinical performance of a point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic assay for the detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea. A noninterventional, cross-sectional clinical study was conducted from September 18, 2018, through March 13, 2019, at sexually transmitted infection (STI), HIV, family planning, and obstetrics and gynecology clinics where STI screening is routine, using a convenience sample and comparing commercially available assays with a new 30-minute POC assay. Patients included were those eligible for STI screening or diagnostic testing who had not taken antibiotics effective against chlamydia or gonorrhea within the previous 28 days. Four vaginal swab samples were collected from women and a first-catch urine sample was obtained from men. A composite infection status was used to classify participants as infected if 2 or more comparator results were positive, as not infected if 2 or more comparator samples were negative, and as unevaluable if 1 result was invalid and the other 2 results did not agree with each other. Swab samples from 1523 women (median age, 27 years [interquartile range, 17-37 years]), 817 (53.6%) of whom presented with symptoms, and 922 men (median age, 29 years [interquartile range, 17-41 years]), 308 (33.4%) of whom were symptomatic, were tested. For chlamydia, sensitivity of the new POC assay was 96.1% (95% CI, 91.2%-98.3%) for women and 92.5% (95% CI, 86.4%-96.0%) for men. For gonorrhea, sensitivity estimates were 100.0% (95% CI, 92.1%-100.0%) for women and 97.3% (95% CI, 90.7%-99.3%) for men. For chlamydia, specificity of the new POC assay was 99.1% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.5%) for women and 99.3% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.7%) for men. For gonorrhea, specificity estimates were 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%-100%) for women and 100% (95% CI, 95.5%-100%) for men. Non-laboratory-trained personnel performed 94.8% of all tests (2318 of 2445) during the study. This study suggests that self-obtained vaginal swab samples were associated with performance equivalent to laboratory-based molecular diagnostics, which can support use of this POC assay in many settings. The availability of an easy-to-use, rapid (30-minute) molecular test for accurate detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea has the power to facilitate testing and treatment in a single patient visit for these STIs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32407506
pii: 2765941
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4819
pmc: PMC7225902
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e204819

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068613
Pays : United States

Références

Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1816-1823
pubmed: 31504314
Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Nov;41(11):665-70
pubmed: 25299413
Lancet. 1982 Sep 11;2(8298):574-7
pubmed: 6125729
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Feb;35(2):119-23
pubmed: 17898680
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Feb;46(2):e8-e10
pubmed: 30640863
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Aug;22 Suppl 6:e25343
pubmed: 31468679
Int J STD AIDS. 2012 Jul;23(7):457-8
pubmed: 22843996
Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Apr;26(4):232-40
pubmed: 10225593
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug 1;178(3):484-92
pubmed: 23813703
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1824-1825
pubmed: 31504333
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):e020394
pubmed: 30201794
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Jun;46(6):357-363
pubmed: 31095100
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Sep;93(6):424-429
pubmed: 28159916
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Sep;90(6):474
pubmed: 25118322
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137
pubmed: 26042815
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 16;161(12):902-10
pubmed: 25243785
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;74(1):36-44
pubmed: 30392736
Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Jan;47(1):67-69
pubmed: 31856075
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799
pubmed: 28137831

Auteurs

Barbara Van Der Pol (B)

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham.

Stephanie N Taylor (SN)

Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.

Leandro Mena (L)

Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

Joel Lebed (J)

Planned Parenthood of Southern Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Candice Joy McNeil (CJ)

Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

LaShonda Crane (L)

Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Houston, Texas.

Aaron Ermel (A)

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

Adam Sukhija-Cohen (A)

AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, California.

Charlotte A Gaydos (CA)

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH