Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Ipilimumab
/ therapeutic use
Liver
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Melanoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Middle Aged
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Radiopharmaceuticals
Spleen
/ diagnostic imaging
Biomarker
Immune checkpoint blockade
Melanoma
Positron emission tomography
Spleen to liver ratio
Journal
Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society
ISSN: 1470-7330
Titre abrégé: Cancer Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101172931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 May 2020
14 May 2020
Historique:
received:
16
11
2019
accepted:
17
04
2020
entrez:
16
5
2020
pubmed:
16
5
2020
medline:
20
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immune checkpoint blockade such as ipilimumab and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies have significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. Biomarkers are urgently needed as a majority of patients do not respond, despite treatment-related toxicities. We analysed pre-treatment This retrospective study evaluated pre-treatment FDG PET/CT scans in a discovery cohort of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab or anti-PD1. Pre-treatment scans were assessed for maximum tumoral standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and spleen to liver ratio (SLR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were characterised and modelled using univariable and multivariable analyses. Correlation of SLR and OS was validated in an independent cohort. Blood parameters and stored sera of patients from the discovery cohort was analysed to investigate biological correlates with SLR. Of the 90 evaluable patients in the discovery cohort: 50 received ipilimumab monotherapy, 20 received anti-PD1 monotherapy, and 20 patients received ipilimumab followed by anti-PD1 upon disease progression. High SLR > 1.1 was associated with poor PFS (median 1 vs 3 months; HR 3.14, p = 0.008) for patients treated with ipilimumab. High SLR was associated with poor OS after ipilimumab (median 1 vs 21 months; HR 5.83, p = 0.0001); as well as poor OS after first line immunotherapy of either ipilimumab or anti-PD1 (median 1 vs 14 months; HR 3.92, p = 0.003). The association of high SLR and poor OS after ipilimumab was validated in an independent cohort of 110 patients (median 2.3 months versus 11.9 months, HR 3.74). SLR was associated with poor OS in a multi-variable model independent of stage, LDH, absolute lymphocyte count and MTV. Pre-treatment Spleen to liver ratio (SLR) > 1.1 was associated with poor outcome after ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. This parameter warrants prospective evaluation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint blockade such as ipilimumab and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies have significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. Biomarkers are urgently needed as a majority of patients do not respond, despite treatment-related toxicities. We analysed pre-treatment
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study evaluated pre-treatment FDG PET/CT scans in a discovery cohort of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab or anti-PD1. Pre-treatment scans were assessed for maximum tumoral standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and spleen to liver ratio (SLR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were characterised and modelled using univariable and multivariable analyses. Correlation of SLR and OS was validated in an independent cohort. Blood parameters and stored sera of patients from the discovery cohort was analysed to investigate biological correlates with SLR.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 90 evaluable patients in the discovery cohort: 50 received ipilimumab monotherapy, 20 received anti-PD1 monotherapy, and 20 patients received ipilimumab followed by anti-PD1 upon disease progression. High SLR > 1.1 was associated with poor PFS (median 1 vs 3 months; HR 3.14, p = 0.008) for patients treated with ipilimumab. High SLR was associated with poor OS after ipilimumab (median 1 vs 21 months; HR 5.83, p = 0.0001); as well as poor OS after first line immunotherapy of either ipilimumab or anti-PD1 (median 1 vs 14 months; HR 3.92, p = 0.003). The association of high SLR and poor OS after ipilimumab was validated in an independent cohort of 110 patients (median 2.3 months versus 11.9 months, HR 3.74). SLR was associated with poor OS in a multi-variable model independent of stage, LDH, absolute lymphocyte count and MTV.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Pre-treatment Spleen to liver ratio (SLR) > 1.1 was associated with poor outcome after ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. This parameter warrants prospective evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32408884
doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00313-2
pii: 10.1186/s40644-020-00313-2
pmc: PMC7227105
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Ipilimumab
0
Radiopharmaceuticals
0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
36Subventions
Organisme : Royal Australasian College of Physicians
ID : NZ Research Entry Scholarship
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : APP1108050
Références
Nucl Med Commun. 2013 Jan;34(1):64-70
pubmed: 23076270
Nucl Med Commun. 2009 Oct;30(10):763-9
pubmed: 19654562
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jan;88:1-9
pubmed: 29175734
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Nov;36(11):1813-21
pubmed: 19499219
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4102-4109
pubmed: 27863197
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1569-1574
pubmed: 29659679
Radiology. 1999 Nov;213(2):521-5
pubmed: 10551235
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2517-26
pubmed: 21639810
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):943-955
pubmed: 27269740
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32
pubmed: 25891173
J Int Med Res. 2007 Mar-Apr;35(2):231-6
pubmed: 17542410
J Nucl Med. 2010 Mar;51(3):340-6
pubmed: 20150263
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(13):2072-82
pubmed: 26219870
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(8):1312-1318
pubmed: 28315947
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1889-94
pubmed: 25667295
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:122S-50S
pubmed: 19403881
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18
pubmed: 26115796
Radiology. 1993 Dec;189(3):847-50
pubmed: 8234714
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):611-622
pubmed: 28359784
Nuklearmedizin. 2014;53(2):26-31
pubmed: 24305850
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Apr;29(4):506-15
pubmed: 11914889
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Oct;39(10):1592-8
pubmed: 22801730
Nature. 2017 May 4;545(7652):60-65
pubmed: 28397821
Science. 2016 May 6;352(6286):658-60
pubmed: 27151852
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jun;48(2):137-43
pubmed: 24900154
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-206
pubmed: 19917835
Cancer Imaging. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):35
pubmed: 27756360