Clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with covid-19 pneumonia who require oxygen: observational comparative study using routine care data.
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 May 2020
14 May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
16
5
2020
pubmed:
16
5
2020
medline:
20
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in patients admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pneumonia who require oxygen. Comparative observational study using data collected from routine care. Four French tertiary care centres providing care to patients with covid-19 pneumonia between 12 March and 31 March 2020. 181 patients aged 18-80 years with documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia who required oxygen but not intensive care. Hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 600 mg/day within 48 hours of admission to hospital (treatment group) versus standard care without hydroxychloroquine (control group). The primary outcome was survival without transfer to the intensive care unit at day 21. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, survival without acute respiratory distress syndrome, weaning from oxygen, and discharge from hospital to home or rehabilitation (all at day 21). Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors by inverse probability of treatment weighting. In the main analysis, 84 patients who received hydroxychloroquine within 48 hours of admission to hospital (treatment group) were compared with 89 patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (control group). Eight additional patients received hydroxychloroquine more than 48 hours after admission. In the weighted analyses, the survival rate without transfer to the intensive care unit at day 21 was 76% in the treatment group and 75% in the control group (weighted hazard ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.1). Overall survival at day 21 was 89% in the treatment group and 91% in the control group (1.2, 0.4 to 3.3). Survival without acute respiratory distress syndrome at day 21 was 69% in the treatment group compared with 74% in the control group (1.3, 0.7 to 2.6). At day 21, 82% of patients in the treatment group had been weaned from oxygen compared with 76% in the control group (weighted risk ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.3). Eight patients in the treatment group (10%) experienced electrocardiographic modifications that required discontinuation of treatment. Hydroxychloroquine has received worldwide attention as a potential treatment for covid-19 because of positive results from small studies. However, the results of this study do not support its use in patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 who require oxygen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32409486
doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1844
pmc: PMC7221472
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Hydroxychloroquine
4QWG6N8QKH
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
m1844Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):1787-1799
pubmed: 32187464
Presse Med. 2014 Jun;43(6 Pt 2):e167-80
pubmed: 24855048
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):732-739
pubmed: 32150618
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Immunol. 2011 Apr 15;186(8):4794-804
pubmed: 21398612
BMJ. 2020 Apr 1;369:m1335
pubmed: 32238355
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79
pubmed: 26238958
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;9(9):509-514
pubmed: 32558354
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1769-1770
pubmed: 32208485
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 1;179(3):368-70
pubmed: 24287470
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jun;95(6):1213-1221
pubmed: 32359771
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64
pubmed: 26994063
Science. 2020 Mar 27;367(6485):1412-1413
pubmed: 32217705
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 16;172(12):819-821
pubmed: 32227189
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11):754-755
pubmed: 32232419
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308
pubmed: 28114554
Med Mal Infect. 2020 Jun;50(4):384
pubmed: 32240719
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):697-706
pubmed: 32224310
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60
pubmed: 10955408
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949
pubmed: 32205204
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 15;23(19):2937-60
pubmed: 15351954