Do Customers Pay Attention to Motivations and Switching Costs When They Terminate Their Relationships?

moderating effects motivations relationship avoidance relationship termination switching costs

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 06 12 2019
accepted: 31 03 2020
entrez: 16 5 2020
pubmed: 16 5 2020
medline: 16 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Research on some key boundary conditions and outcomes of consumers' relationship termination in the online environment is scare. We examine how four categories (e.g., upkeep, time, benefits, and personal loss) of avoiding relationships affect customers' relationship termination. We also consider both the motivation (hedonic vs. utilitarian) and switching costs when customers evaluate whether to exit from or stay in a relationship. Results show that time plays a significant role in customers' relationship termination, but there appears to be an increase or decrease in customers' relationship termination associated with the role of two moderators. More specifically, upkeep plays a significant role in affecting relationship termination for consumers motivated by hedonic interests (as opposed to those motivated by utilitarian interests). Meanwhile, personal loss plays a role in affecting relationship termination for utilitarian consumers (and not hedonic). Furthermore, we found that high switching costs facilitate a relationship termination if time and personal loss are involved. The findings indicate that the effect of high switching costs on customer loyalty is limited. We also found that when consumers consider time category, they are likely to have a greater intent to terminate a relationship regardless of the level of switching costs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32411057
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00798
pmc: PMC7201131
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

798

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Huifeng and Ha.

Références

J Pers. 2006 Feb;74(1):175-222
pubmed: 16451230
Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):515-8
pubmed: 17255512
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:31-65
pubmed: 17716081
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 31;8:92
pubmed: 28197116
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):540-57
pubmed: 12635915
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Dec;99(6):948-63
pubmed: 20658838
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jul;73(1):171-85
pubmed: 9216083

Auteurs

Pan Huifeng (P)

Department of Economics, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.

Hong-Youl Ha (HY)

Department of International Trade, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea.

Classifications MeSH