Performance of Online Somatic Cell Count Estimation in Automatic Milking Systems.

automatic milking machine dairy cow mastitis on-farm screening tool online-California mastitis test somatic cell count udder health monitoring

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 29 11 2019
accepted: 01 04 2020
entrez: 16 5 2020
pubmed: 16 5 2020
medline: 16 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Somatic cell count (SCC) is one of the most important and widely used mastitis diagnostics. For detecting (sub)clinical mastitis, online SCC related measurements are more and more used in automatic milking systems (AMS). Sensors such as an automated online California Mastitis Test (O-CMT) allow for high frequency screening of high SCC cows within a herd, which makes it potentially powerful to identify episodes of mastitis. However, the performance of O-CMT measurements, as compared to SCC determined in the laboratory (L-SCC), has only scarcely been described. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the agreement between the O-CMT measurement averaged over different time windows and the corresponding L-SCC measurements; (2) to determine the optimal time window for averaging O-CMT as compared to L-SCC; (3) to explore the added value of time-series of frequent O-CMT measurements in individual cow udder health monitoring compared to L-SCC measurements. Data were collected from 50 farms in 6 different countries that were equipped with AMS using O-CMT measurements and also performed regular L-SCC testing. We found that the overall concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between O-CMT and L-SCC was 0.53 but differed substantially between farms. The CCC between O-CMT and L-SCC improved when averaging O-CMT over multiple milkings, with an optimal time-window of 24 h. Exploration of time series of daily O-CMT recordings show that this is an effective screening tool to find episodes of high SCC. Altogether, we conclude that although O-CMT agrees moderately with L-SCC, because of its high measurement frequency, it is a promising on-farm tool for udder health monitoring.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32411740
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00221
pmc: PMC7198803
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

221

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Deng, Hogeveen, Lam, van der Tol and Koop.

Références

Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10428-10439
pubmed: 30172403
Vet Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):565-78
pubmed: 14556695
Vet Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):579-96
pubmed: 14556696
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Jan;87(1):95-105
pubmed: 14765815
Springerplus. 2014 Dec 22;3:760
pubmed: 25674485
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Dec;91(12):4560-70
pubmed: 19038931
Vet J. 2002 Sep;164(2):116-28
pubmed: 12359466
Vet Rec. 2007 Mar 3;160(9):287-93
pubmed: 17337605
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4926-4940
pubmed: 28365116
N Z Vet J. 2011 Jan;59(1):16-23
pubmed: 21328153
J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(1):90-105
pubmed: 19127469
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3358-64
pubmed: 20630252
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):608-20
pubmed: 26547650

Auteurs

Zhaoju Deng (Z)

Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Henk Hogeveen (H)

Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Chair Group Business Economics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Theo J G M Lam (TJGM)

Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
GD Animal Health, Deventer, Netherlands.

Rik van der Tol (R)

Farm Technology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Gerrit Koop (G)

Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH