Parents' satisfaction with paediatric dental treatment under sedation: A cross-sectional study.
child behaviour
conscious sedation
patient satisfaction
Journal
International journal of paediatric dentistry
ISSN: 1365-263X
Titre abrégé: Int J Paediatr Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
revised:
20
04
2020
received:
09
02
2020
accepted:
27
04
2020
pubmed:
16
5
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
16
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient-reported outcomes are under-investigated in the field of paediatric dental sedation. To evaluate the satisfaction of parents/guardians with their children's dental sedation, compare it to the dentist's satisfaction, and identify associated factors. This study was performed with parents/guardians of young children treated under sedation and dentists. Participants' satisfaction was measured using the visual analogue scale (0-100). Child's behaviour was classified using the Ohio State Behavioural Rating Scale. Other information was collected during interviews and from patient charts. The Spearman's, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed (P < .05). A total of 167 parents/guardians and ten dentists participated in the study. Protective stabilisation and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) were used in 69.9% and 51.5% appointments, respectively. The parents/guardians (median: 91 [25-75 percentile: 75-96]) and dentists (76 [23-98]) were satisfied. Parental/guardian satisfaction was higher than dentist satisfaction (P ≤ .001). Parental/guardian satisfaction was positively correlated with quiet child behaviour (r = 0.347, P ≤ .001) and was associated with the non-use of protective stabilisation (P ≤ .001), no previous toothache (P = .019), and the use of ART (P = .018). The participants were satisfied with treatment under sedation. Parents/guardians were more satisfied, especially, when the child had cooperative behaviour.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patient-reported outcomes are under-investigated in the field of paediatric dental sedation.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the satisfaction of parents/guardians with their children's dental sedation, compare it to the dentist's satisfaction, and identify associated factors.
DESIGN
METHODS
This study was performed with parents/guardians of young children treated under sedation and dentists. Participants' satisfaction was measured using the visual analogue scale (0-100). Child's behaviour was classified using the Ohio State Behavioural Rating Scale. Other information was collected during interviews and from patient charts. The Spearman's, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed (P < .05).
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 167 parents/guardians and ten dentists participated in the study. Protective stabilisation and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) were used in 69.9% and 51.5% appointments, respectively. The parents/guardians (median: 91 [25-75 percentile: 75-96]) and dentists (76 [23-98]) were satisfied. Parental/guardian satisfaction was higher than dentist satisfaction (P ≤ .001). Parental/guardian satisfaction was positively correlated with quiet child behaviour (r = 0.347, P ≤ .001) and was associated with the non-use of protective stabilisation (P ≤ .001), no previous toothache (P = .019), and the use of ART (P = .018).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The participants were satisfied with treatment under sedation. Parents/guardians were more satisfied, especially, when the child had cooperative behaviour.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
337-343Subventions
Organisme : National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
ID : 449950 / 2014-0
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás
ID : 201710267000525
Informations de copyright
© 2020 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet. 2006;367:766-780.
Coté CJ, Wilson S. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41:26E-52E.
Ashley PF, Chaudhary M, Lourenço-Matharu L. Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD003877.
Oh S, Kingsley K. Efficacy of ketamin in pediatric sedation dentistry: a systematic review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018;39:e1-e4.
Kim HJ, Shin WJ, Park S, Ahn HS, Oh JH. The sedative effects of the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing surgeries compared to other sedation methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2017;38:33-39.
Williams MR, Nayshtut M, Hoefnagel A, et al. Efficacy outcome measures for pediatric procedural sedation clinical trials: an ACTTION systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:9556-9567.
Noonan VK, Lyddiatt A, Ware P, et al. Montreal accord on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 3: patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;89:125-135.
Hagan PP, Hagan JP, Fields HW Jr, Machen JB. The legal status of informed consent for behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 1984;6:204-208.
Arcari S, Ferro R. Preschool children and relative analgesia: satisfaction grading through a verbal questionnaire. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9:18-22.
Lima ARA, Medeiros M, Costa LR. Mothers' perceptions about pediatric dental sedation as an alternative to dental general anesthesia. Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2015;63:153-160.
Patel M, McTigue DJ, Thikkurissy S, Fields HW. Parental attitudes toward advanced behavior guidance techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:30-36.
Kip G, Atabek D, Bani M. Comparison of three different ketofol proportions in children undergoing dental treatment. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:1501-1507.
Al Zoubi L, Schmoeckel J, Mustafa Ali M, Alkilzy M, Splieth CH. Parental acceptance of advanced behaviour management tecnhiques in normal treatment and in emergency situations used in paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20:319-323.
Theriot AL, Gomez L, Chang CT, et al. Ethnic and language influence on parents’ perception of paediatric behaviour management techniques. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29:301-309.
Kupietzky A. Effects of video information on parental preoperative anxiety level and their perception of conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia for the dental treatment of their young child. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006;31:90-92.
Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents: a review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17:391-406.
Tinanoff N, Baez RJ, Diaz Guillory C, et al. Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: global perspective. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29:238-248.
World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods, 5th edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/97035/9789241548649_eng.pdf?sequence=1
Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory. J Dent Child. 1962;29:150-163.
Corah NL, Gale EN, Illig SJ. Assessment of a dental anxiety scale. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;97:816-819.
Freeman RE. Dental anxiety: a multifactorial aetiology. Brit Dent J. 1985;159:406-408.
Sado-Filho J, Viana KA, Corrêa-Faria P, Costa LR, Costa PS. Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213074.
Radis FG, Wilson S, Griffen AL, Coury DL. Temperament as a predictor of behaviour during initial dental examination in children. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:121-127.
Moura LD, Costa PS, Costa LR. How do observational scales correlate the ratings of children’s behavior during pediatric procedural sedation? Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5248271.
White J, Wells M, Arheart KL, Donaldson M, Woods MA. A questionnaire of parental perceptions of conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:116-121.
Shroff S, Hughes C, Mobley C. Attitudes and preferences of parents about being present in the dental operatory. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:51-55.22.
Kvaerner KJ, Moen MC, Haugeto O, Mair IW. Paediatric otolaryngology - a parental satisfaction study in outpatient surgery. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2000;543:201-205.
Magaret ND, Clark TA, Warden CR, Magnusson AR, Hedges JR. Patient satisfaction in the emergency department - a survey of pediatric patients and their parents. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1379-1388.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Protective stabilization for pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39:260-265.
Maciel R, Salvador D, Azoubel K, et al. The opinion of children and their parents about four different types of dental restorations in a public health service in Brazil. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18:25-29.