Intake of sucrose affects gut dysbiosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Dietary habit
Gut microbiota
Type 2 diabetes
Journal
Journal of diabetes investigation
ISSN: 2040-1124
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Investig
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101520702
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
13
01
2020
revised:
07
05
2020
accepted:
08
05
2020
pubmed:
16
5
2020
medline:
20
8
2021
entrez:
16
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gut dysbiosis is generally associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the effect of habitual dietary intake on gut dysbiosis in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not yet been explicated. This study investigated whether alteration of the gut microbiota was influenced by dietary intake of sucrose in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this cross-sectional study, 97 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 97 healthy individuals were matched by age and sex, and then, fecal samples were obtained. Next-generation sequencing of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene was carried out, and functional profiles for the gut microbiota were analyzed. We selected the top 30 gut microbial genera and top 20 functional profiles for the gut microbiota specified by the weighted average difference method. The association between gut microbial genera or functional profiles and habitual dietary intake was investigated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and then, clustering analysis was carried out to clarify the impact of habitual dietary intake. The Actinobacteria phylum was highly abundant in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, whereas the Bacteroidetes phylum was less abundant. Diabetic-type gut microbes, specifically Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium, were altered by sucrose intake at the genus level. Furthermore, sucrose intake was associated with glycolysis/gluconeogenesis in the diabetic-type functional profiles of the gut microbiota. The gut microbiota and functional profiles for the gut microbiota in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were significantly different from those in healthy individuals. Furthermore, we showed that sucrose intake was closely associated with these differences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32412684
doi: 10.1111/jdi.13293
pmc: PMC7610116
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Sweetening Agents
0
Sucrose
57-50-1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1623-1634Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 16675576
Organisme : Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan: Grant of the Industry-Academia-Government Collaboration in "Field for Knowledge Integration and Innovation" (FKII)
ID : 16824414
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;77 Suppl 1:S178-83
pubmed: 17478005
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1022-3
pubmed: 17183309
J Diabetes Investig. 2014 Sep;5(5):570-80
pubmed: 25411626
JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):355-356
pubmed: 28006047
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 2;116(1):233-238
pubmed: 30559205
EBioMedicine. 2020 Jan;51:102590
pubmed: 31901868
Nutrients. 2018 Feb 03;10(2):
pubmed: 29401650
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27
pubmed: 29222373
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;54(1):53-63
pubmed: 29926167
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 05;5(2):e9085
pubmed: 20140211
Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):99-103
pubmed: 23719380
Cell Metab. 2018 Feb 6;27(2):351-361.e3
pubmed: 29414685
Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov;41(11):2385-2395
pubmed: 30224347
Front Immunol. 2017 Jul 28;8:838
pubmed: 28804483
Nature. 2017 Nov 30;551(7682):585-589
pubmed: 29143823
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Jan 22;12:21
pubmed: 23339473
Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):250-3
pubmed: 26828196
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 29;9(2):
pubmed: 32013181
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2343-50
pubmed: 24824547
Biomedicines. 2020 Jan 07;8(1):
pubmed: 31936158
Diabetologia. 2017 Sep;60(9):1761-1769
pubmed: 28642969
Endocrinology. 1999 Oct;140(10):4595-600
pubmed: 10499515
Physiology (Bethesda). 2016 Jul;31(4):283-93
pubmed: 27252163
Nutrition. 2020 Mar;71:110639
pubmed: 31869658
Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Jan;43(1):139-148
pubmed: 29717276
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Jun;38(6):685-688
pubmed: 32483366
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 21;20(2):
pubmed: 30669548
Nutrients. 2018 Jul 30;10(8):
pubmed: 30061492
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2019 May;64(3):231-238
pubmed: 31138957
mBio. 2014 Sep 30;5(5):e01530-14
pubmed: 25271283
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):95-106
pubmed: 28852861
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):55-60
pubmed: 23023125
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):523-30
pubmed: 27366720
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0119983
pubmed: 25793407
J Biol Chem. 2010 Oct 29;285(44):34279-87
pubmed: 20739284
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):14863-8
pubmed: 9843981
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019 Apr;63(7):e1800870
pubmed: 30636111
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):11070-5
pubmed: 16033867
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2018 Jan;62(1):100-105
pubmed: 29371761
J Diabetes Investig. 2014 Mar 23;5(2):176-87
pubmed: 24843758
Nature. 2011 Jan 27;469(7331):543-7
pubmed: 21270894
J Lipid Res. 2013 Sep;54(9):2325-40
pubmed: 23821742
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jul;14(7):1200-11
pubmed: 21477414
Microb Pathog. 2017 Oct;111:362-369
pubmed: 28912092
Nature. 2016 Jul 21;535(7612):376-81
pubmed: 27409811
DNA Res. 2016 Apr;23(2):125-33
pubmed: 26951067
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;132:79-84
pubmed: 28802699
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jun;53(6):982-92
pubmed: 19339088
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2017 Nov;61(3):217-221
pubmed: 29203964
Genome Med. 2013 Jul 31;5(7):65
pubmed: 23906180
Nutr J. 2014 Jun 17;13:60
pubmed: 24939063
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2008 Jun 26;3:8
pubmed: 18578891
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
Nature. 2018 Mar 8;555(7695):210-215
pubmed: 29489753
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2369-2379
pubmed: 27974040