Phase-Specific Predictors of Countermovement Jump Performance That Distinguish Good From Poor Jumpers.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2022
01 May 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
16
5
2020
medline:
3
5
2022
entrez:
16
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Krzyszkowski, J, Chowning, LD, and Harry, JR. Phase-specific predictors of countermovement jump performance that distinguish good from poor jumpers. J Strength Cond Res 36(5): 1257-1263, 2022-The modified-reactive strength index (RSImod) is commonly examined during the countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) to assess neuromuscular characteristics (i.e., explosiveness, fatigue, adaptation, etc.) of an athlete. However, both phase-specific variables explaining RSImod and corresponding differences between good and poor jumpers are not well understood in trained populations. This study sought to (a) identify predictors of RSImod during the CMJ based on phase-specific temporal and rate of force development (RFD) variables, and (b) identify differences in those predictors between performers with high and low RSImod performances from a sample of collegiate male basketball players (n = 22; 20 ± 2 years; 1.99 ± 0.06 month; 93.8 ± 7.5 kg). Subjects performed 3 maximal effort CMJ trials while ground reaction force data was recorded using 2 force platforms. Phase-specific temporal and RFD variables were calculated and entered into separate stepwise regression models using backward elimination to identify predictors RSImod. Individuals were then categorized into high (n = 11; RSImod = 0.68 ± 0.10) and low (n = 11; RSImod = 0.48 ± 0.04) RSImod groups according to the overall median RSImod (RSImod = 0.55). Independent t-tests (α = 0.05) were conducted and supplemented by Cohen's d effect sizes (d ≥ 1.2, large) to compare groups relative to significant predictors identified by the linear regression models and related variables. The temporal regression model (R2 = 0.530) retained unloading time and concentric time, whereas the RFD regression model (R2 = 0.429) retained unloading RFD and braking RFD. The high RSImod group exhibited significantly greater RSImod scores (d = 2.51, p < 0.001) and jump heights (d = 1.58, p < 0.001), shorter times to takeoff (d = 1.27, p = 0.007) and concentric times (d = 1.51, p = 0.002), and a greater braking RFD (d = 1.41, p = 0.005) than the low RSImod group. Individuals targeting enhanced CMJ performance may consider exploring strategies or interventions to develop quicker unloading and concentric phases and increasing eccentric RFD abilities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32412965
pii: 00124278-202205000-00012
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003645
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1257-1263Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Barker LA, Harry JR, Mercer JA. Relationships between countermovement jump ground reaction forces and jump height, reactive strength index, and jump time. J Strength Cond Res 32: 248–254, 2018.
Bobbert MF, Gerritsen KG, Litjens MC, Van Soest AJ. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? Med Sci Sports Exerc 28: 1402–1412, 1996.
Cheraghi M, Sarvestan J, Sebyani M, Shirzad E. Stretch-Shortening Cycle in Countermovement Jump: Exclusive Review of Force-Time Curve Variables in Eccentric and Concentric Phases. Preprints: 2017. Available at: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201708.0070/v1 . Accessed October 17, 2019.
Claudino JG, Cronin J, Mezêncio B, et al. The countermovement jump to monitor neuromuscular status: A meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 20: 397–402, 2017.
Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Changes in the eccentric phase contribute to improved stretch-shorten cycle performance after training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1731–1744, 2010.
Davis DS, Barnette BJ, Kiger JT, Mirasola JJ, Young SM. Physical characteristics that predict functional performance in Division I college football players. J Strength Cond Res 18: 115–120, 2004.
Dos'Santos T, Thomas C, Comfort P, McMahon J, Jones P. Relationships between isometric force-time characteristics and dynamic performance. Sports 5: 68, 2017.
Earp JE, Kraemer WJ, Cormie P, et al. Influence of muscle–tendon unit structure on rate of force development during the squat, countermovement, and drop jumps. J Strength Cond Res 25: 340–347, 2011.
Ebben WP, Petushek EJ. Using the reactive strength index modified to evaluate plyometric performance. J Strength Cond Res 24: 1983–1987, 2010.
Ford KR, Myer GD, Brent JL, Hewett TE. Hip and knee extensor moments predict vertical jump height in adolescent girls. J Strength Cond Res 23: 1327, 2009.
Gajewski J, Michalski R, Buśko K, Mazur-Różycka J, Staniak Z. Countermovement depth–a variable which clarifies the relationship between the maximum power output and height of a vertical jump. Acta Bioeng Biomech 20: 127–134, 2018.
Gathercole R, Sporer B, Stellingwerff T, Sleivert G. Alternative countermovement-jump analysis to quantify acute neuromuscular fatigue. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10: 84–92, 2015.
Harry JR, Barker LA, Paquette MR. A joint power approach to define countermovement jump phases using force platforms. Med Sci Sports Exerc 52: 993–1000, 2019.
Harry JR, Barker LA, Paquette MR. Sex and acute weighted vest differences in force production and joint work during countermovement vertical jumping. J Sports Sci 37: 1318–1326, 2019.
Harry JR, Paquette MR, Schilling BK, et al. Kinetic and electromyographic subphase characteristics with relation to countermovement vertical jump performance. J Appl Biomech 34: 291–297, 2018.
Heishman A, Brown B, Daub B, et al. The influence of countermovement jump protocol on reactive strength index modified and flight time: Contraction time in collegiate basketball players. Sports 7: 37, 2019.
Holm DJ, Stålbom M, Keogh JW, Cronin J. Relationship between the kinetics and kinematics of a unilateral horizontal drop jump to sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1589–1596, 2008.
Hopkins WG. A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. new view of statistics. 2002. Available at: http://sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html . Accessed October 10, 2013.
Kibele A. Possibilities and limitations in the biomechanical analysis of countermovement jumps: A methodological study. J Appl Biomech 14: 105–117, 1998.
Kijowksi KN, Capps CR, Goodman CL, et al. Short-term resistance and plyometric training improves eccentric phase kinetics in jumping. J Strength Cond Res 29: 2186–2196, 2015.
Kipp K. Joint- and subject-specific strategies in male basketball players across a range of countermovement jump heights. J Sports Sci 38: 652–657, 2020.
Kipp K, Kiely MT, Geiser CF. Reactive strength index modified is a valid measure of explosiveness in collegiate female volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 30: 1341–1347, 2016.
Kirby TJ, McBride JM, Haines TL, Dayne AM. Relative net vertical impulse determines jumping performance. J Appl Biomech 27: 207–214, 2011.
Laffaye G, Wagner P. Eccentric rate of force development determines jumping performance. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 16: 82–83, 2013.
Laffaye G, Wagner PP, Tombleson TI. Countermovement jump height: Gender and sport-specific differences in the force-time variables. J Strength Cond Res 28: 1096–1105, 2014.
Linthorne NP. Analysis of standing vertical jumps using a force platform. Am J Phys 69: 1198–1204, 2001.
McMahon J, Lake J, Comfort P. Reliability of and relationship between flight time to contraction time ratio and reactive strength index modified. Sports 6: 81, 2018.
McMahon J, Rej S, Comfort P. Sex differences in countermovement jump phase characteristics. Sports 5: 8, 2017.
McMahon JJ, Jones PA, Suchomel TJ, Lake J, Comfort P. Influence of the reactive strength index modified on force–and power–time curves. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13: 220–227, 2017.
McMahon JJ, Murphy S, Rej SJ, Comfort P. Countermovement-jump-phase characteristics of senior and academy rugby league players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12: 803–811, 2017.
McMahon JJ, Suchomel TJ, Lake JP, Comfort P. Relationship between reactive strength index variants in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 35: 280–285, 2021.
McMahon JJ, Suchomel TJ, Lake JP, Comfort P. Understanding the key phases of the countermovement jump force-time curve. Strength Cond J 40: 96–106, 2018.
Meylan CM, Nosaka K, Green J, Cronin JB. The effect of three different start thresholds on the kinematics and kinetics of a countermovement jump. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1164–1167, 2011.
Pérez-Castilla A, Rojas FJ, Gómez-Martínez F, García-Ramos A. Vertical jump performance is affected by the velocity and depth of the countermovement. Sports Biomech 1–16, 2019.
Petridis L, Tróznai Z, Pálinkás G, Kalabiska I, Szabó T. Modified reactive strength index in adolescent athletes competing in different sports and its relationship with force production. Am J Sports Sci Med 5: 21–26, 2017.
Rice PE, Goodman CL, Capps CR, et al. Force and power–time curve comparison during jumping between strength-matched male and female basketball players. Eur J Sport Sci 17: 286–293, 2017.
Sole C, Suchomel T, Stone M. Preliminary scale of reference values for evaluating reactive strength index-modified in male and female NCAA Division I athletes. Sports 6: 133, 2018.
Sole CJ, Mizuguchi S, Sato K, Moir GL, Stone MH. Phase characteristics of the countermovement jump force-time curve: A comparison of athletes by jumping ability. J Strength Cond Res 32: 1155–1165, 2018.
Spiteri T, Binetti M, Scanlan AT. Physical determinants of Division 1 collegiate basketball, Women's National Basketball League, and Women's National Basketball Association athletes: With reference to lower-body sidedness. J Strength Cond Res 33: 159–166, 2019.
Suchomel TJ, Bailey CA, Sole CJ, Grazer JL, Beckham GK. Using reactive strength index-modified as an explosive performance measurement tool in Division I athletes. J Strength Cond Res 29: 899–904, 2015.
Suchomel TJ, Sole CJ, Bailey CA, Grazer JL, Beckham GK. A comparison of reactive strength index-modified between six US collegiate athletic teams. J Strength Cond Res 29: 1310–1316, 2015.
Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—Or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 4: 279–282, 2012.
Vincent WJ, Weir JP. Statistics in Kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012.
Zampagni ML, Casino D, Benelli P, et al. Anthropometric and strength variables to predict freestyle performance times in elite master swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1298–1307, 2008.