The sensitivity of transcriptomics BMD modeling to the methods used for microarray data normalization.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 10 10 2019
accepted: 25 04 2020
entrez: 16 5 2020
pubmed: 16 5 2020
medline: 1 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Whole-genome expression data generated by microarray studies have shown promise for quantitative human health risk assessment. While numerous approaches have been developed to determine benchmark doses (BMDs) from probeset-level dose responses, sensitivity of the results to methods used for normalization of the data has not yet been systematically investigated. Normalization of microarray data converts raw hybridization signals to expression estimates that are expected to be proportional to the amounts of transcripts in the profiled specimens. Different approaches to normalization have been shown to greatly influence the results of some downstream analyses, including biological interpretation. In this study we evaluate the influence of microarray normalization methods on the transcriptomic BMDs. We demonstrate using in vivo data that the use of alternative pipelines for normalization of Affymetrix microarray data can have a considerable impact on the number of detected differentially expressed genes and pathways (processes) determined to be treatment responsive, which may lead to alternative interpretations of the data. In addition, we found that normalization can have a considerable effect (as much as ~30-fold in this study) on estimation of the minimum biological potency (transcriptomic point of departure). We argue for consideration of alternative normalization methods and their data-informed selection to most effectively interpret microarray data for use in human health risk assessment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32413060
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232955
pii: PONE-D-19-28212
pmc: PMC7228135
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0232955

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 1;380:114706
pubmed: 31400414
Bioinformatics. 2019 May 15;35(10):1780-1782
pubmed: 30329029
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 15;7:137
pubmed: 16539732
Cancer Inform. 2008;6:423-31
pubmed: 19259420
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 23;9:452
pubmed: 18947404
Mol Biosyst. 2016 Oct 20;12(10):3057-66
pubmed: 27452923
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 26;7:358
pubmed: 32039167
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800
pubmed: 21789182
BMC Genomics. 2007 Oct 25;8:387
pubmed: 17961223
Arch Toxicol. 2017 May;91(5):2045-2065
pubmed: 27928627
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 11;11:503
pubmed: 20937082
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 06;6:18898
pubmed: 26732145
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Apr;91(4):1685-1696
pubmed: 27638505
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jul;98(1):240-8
pubmed: 17449896
Bioinformatics. 2006 Apr 1;22(7):789-94
pubmed: 16410320
Toxicol Sci. 2013 Jul;134(1):180-94
pubmed: 23596260
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 30;8:273
pubmed: 17663764
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 1;23(13):i282-8
pubmed: 17646307
Brief Bioinform. 2005 Mar;6(1):86-97
pubmed: 15826359
Toxicol Sci. 2011 Mar;120(1):194-205
pubmed: 21097997
Brief Bioinform. 2017 Sep 1;18(5):886-901
pubmed: 27473066
Toxicol Sci. 2017 May 1;157(1):85-99
pubmed: 28123101
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D396-403
pubmed: 18957448
Biol Direct. 2015 Sep 03;10:46
pubmed: 26335588
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2004;60:25-58
pubmed: 15474586
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D649-D655
pubmed: 29145629

Auteurs

Roman Mezencev (R)

Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US EPA, Washington DC, United States of America.

Scott S Auerbach (SS)

Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH