"If I have money, I cannot allow my baby to breastfeed only …" barriers and facilitators to scale-up of peer counselling for exclusive breastfeeding in Uganda.
Adolescent
Adult
Breast Feeding
/ psychology
Counseling
/ methods
Fathers
/ psychology
Female
HIV Infections
/ psychology
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Mothers
/ psychology
Peer Group
Social Stigma
Social Support
Uganda
Young Adult
Exclusive breastfeeding
Peer counselling
Support
Journal
International breastfeeding journal
ISSN: 1746-4358
Titre abrégé: Int Breastfeed J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101251562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 05 2020
15 05 2020
Historique:
received:
15
07
2019
accepted:
06
05
2020
entrez:
17
5
2020
pubmed:
18
5
2020
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months reduces infant morbidity and mortality and can positively impact on cognitive function. In Uganda, exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months is recommended but many women introduce alternative feeds early. Interventions to scale-up peer support provision for exclusive breastfeeding are limited. We explored the barriers, facilitators and solutions to scaling-up of peer counselling support for exclusive breastfeeding in Uganda. A qualitative study was conducted in Mbale District and Kampala City between April and July 2014. Data were collected through 15 key informant interviews with health workers and managers of organizations involved in child and maternal health as well as seven focus group discussions with peer counsellors who took part in the PROMISE EBF Trial (2006-2008), VHT members, mothers and fathers of children aged 1 year and below. Data were analysed using the content thematic approach. The need for peer support for exclusive breastfeeding, especially for young and first-time mothers, was highlighted by most study participants. While mothers, mothers-in-law, friends and husbands were mentioned as major stakeholders regarding infant feeding, they were perceived to lack adequate information on breastfeeding. Health workers were mentioned as a key source of support, but their constraints of heavy workloads and lack of education materials on breastfeeding were highlighted. High community expectations of peer counsellors, the perceived inadequacy of breast milk, general acceptability of complimentary feeding, household food insecurity, heavy workload for women and unsupportive 'work-places' were key barriers to scaling-up of peer counselling support for breastfeeding. The peer counsellors who were part of the PROMISE EBF trial in Mbale, the village health team programme, health facilities, community groups, the media and professional associations emerged as potential facilitators that can aid the scaling-up of peer counselling support for breastfeeding. Peer support for breastfeeding is highly valued in this setting. The health system and health workers are regarded as the main facilitators to scaling-up of peer support for exclusive breastfeeding. Partnerships with village health teams (VHTs), community groups, role models, professional associations and the media are other potential facilitators to this scaling-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months reduces infant morbidity and mortality and can positively impact on cognitive function. In Uganda, exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months is recommended but many women introduce alternative feeds early. Interventions to scale-up peer support provision for exclusive breastfeeding are limited. We explored the barriers, facilitators and solutions to scaling-up of peer counselling support for exclusive breastfeeding in Uganda.
METHODS
A qualitative study was conducted in Mbale District and Kampala City between April and July 2014. Data were collected through 15 key informant interviews with health workers and managers of organizations involved in child and maternal health as well as seven focus group discussions with peer counsellors who took part in the PROMISE EBF Trial (2006-2008), VHT members, mothers and fathers of children aged 1 year and below. Data were analysed using the content thematic approach.
RESULTS
The need for peer support for exclusive breastfeeding, especially for young and first-time mothers, was highlighted by most study participants. While mothers, mothers-in-law, friends and husbands were mentioned as major stakeholders regarding infant feeding, they were perceived to lack adequate information on breastfeeding. Health workers were mentioned as a key source of support, but their constraints of heavy workloads and lack of education materials on breastfeeding were highlighted. High community expectations of peer counsellors, the perceived inadequacy of breast milk, general acceptability of complimentary feeding, household food insecurity, heavy workload for women and unsupportive 'work-places' were key barriers to scaling-up of peer counselling support for breastfeeding. The peer counsellors who were part of the PROMISE EBF trial in Mbale, the village health team programme, health facilities, community groups, the media and professional associations emerged as potential facilitators that can aid the scaling-up of peer counselling support for breastfeeding.
CONCLUSIONS
Peer support for breastfeeding is highly valued in this setting. The health system and health workers are regarded as the main facilitators to scaling-up of peer support for exclusive breastfeeding. Partnerships with village health teams (VHTs), community groups, role models, professional associations and the media are other potential facilitators to this scaling-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32414404
doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00287-8
pii: 10.1186/s13006-020-00287-8
pmc: PMC7229593
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43Références
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1442-52
pubmed: 19289649
BMC Pediatr. 2007 Mar 01;7:10
pubmed: 17331251
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;52(6):631-7
pubmed: 17984001
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451
pubmed: 23746772
BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):889
pubmed: 29162064
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2:CD001141
pubmed: 28244064
Adv Nutr. 2014 May 14;5(3):291-2
pubmed: 24829476
Int Breastfeed J. 2012 Apr 23;7:5
pubmed: 22524566
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90
pubmed: 26869575
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 30;10(11):e0142718
pubmed: 26619338
Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):e726-32
pubmed: 23420922
Med Anthropol. 1989 Apr;10(4):265-78
pubmed: 2747456
Int Breastfeed J. 2014 Jun 13;9:8
pubmed: 24971154
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42-5
pubmed: 7613329
Int Breastfeed J. 2008 Nov 05;3:26
pubmed: 18986539
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e014145
pubmed: 29070635
Lancet. 2011 Jul 30;378(9789):420-7
pubmed: 21752462
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 21;149(8):565-82
pubmed: 18936504
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Feb 17;7:249-57
pubmed: 25733931
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jan;26(1):53-62
pubmed: 20511348
J Perinat Educ. 2016;25(3):150-161
pubmed: 30538412
Int Breastfeed J. 2006 Oct 20;1:19
pubmed: 17054796
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(4):208-25
pubmed: 18565462
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S20
pubmed: 24564836
Adv Nutr. 2012 Nov 01;3(6):790-800
pubmed: 23153733