What does cell therapy manufacturing cost? A framework and methodology to facilitate academic and other small-scale cell therapy manufacturing costings.

advanced therapy medicinal products cell and gene therapies cell-based therapies cost framework cost methodology manufacturing cost

Journal

Cytotherapy
ISSN: 1477-2566
Titre abrégé: Cytotherapy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100895309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 22 01 2020
revised: 11 03 2020
accepted: 12 03 2020
pubmed: 18 5 2020
medline: 13 2 2021
entrez: 17 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recent technical and clinical advances with cell-based therapies (CBTs) hold great promise in the treatment of patients with rare diseases and those with high unmet medical need. Currently the majority of CBTs are developed and manufactured in specialized academic facilities. Due to small scale, unique characteristics and specific supply chain, CBT manufacturing is considered costly compared to more conventional medicinal products. As a result, biomedical researchers and clinicians are increasingly faced with cost considerations in CBT development. The objective of this research was to develop a costing framework and methodology for academic and other small-scale facilities that manufacture cell-based therapies. We conducted an international multi-center costing study in four facilities in Europe using eight CBTs as case studies. This study includes costs from cell or tissue procurement to release of final product for clinical use. First, via interviews with research scientists, clinicians, biomedical scientists, pharmacists and technicians, we designed a high-level costing framework. Next, we developed a more detailed uniform methodology to allocate cost items. Costs were divided into steps (tissue procurement, manufacturing and fill-finish). The steps were each subdivided into cost categories (materials, equipment, personnel and facility), and each category was broken down into facility running (fixed) costs and operational (variable) costs. The methodology was tested via the case studies and validated in developer interviews. Costs are expressed in 2018 euros (€). The framework and methodology were applicable across facilities and proved sensitive to differences in product and facility characteristics. Case study cost estimates ranged between €23 033 and €190 799 Euros per batch, with batch yield varying between 1 and 88 doses. The cost estimations revealed hidden costs to developers and provided insights into cost drivers to help design manufacturing best practices. This framework and methodology provide step-by-step guidance to estimate manufacturing costs specifically for cell-based therapies manufactured in academic and other small-scale enterprises. The framework and methodology can be used to inform and plan cost-conscious strategies for CBTs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AIMS
Recent technical and clinical advances with cell-based therapies (CBTs) hold great promise in the treatment of patients with rare diseases and those with high unmet medical need. Currently the majority of CBTs are developed and manufactured in specialized academic facilities. Due to small scale, unique characteristics and specific supply chain, CBT manufacturing is considered costly compared to more conventional medicinal products. As a result, biomedical researchers and clinicians are increasingly faced with cost considerations in CBT development. The objective of this research was to develop a costing framework and methodology for academic and other small-scale facilities that manufacture cell-based therapies.
METHODS
We conducted an international multi-center costing study in four facilities in Europe using eight CBTs as case studies. This study includes costs from cell or tissue procurement to release of final product for clinical use. First, via interviews with research scientists, clinicians, biomedical scientists, pharmacists and technicians, we designed a high-level costing framework. Next, we developed a more detailed uniform methodology to allocate cost items. Costs were divided into steps (tissue procurement, manufacturing and fill-finish). The steps were each subdivided into cost categories (materials, equipment, personnel and facility), and each category was broken down into facility running (fixed) costs and operational (variable) costs. The methodology was tested via the case studies and validated in developer interviews. Costs are expressed in 2018 euros (€).
RESULTS
The framework and methodology were applicable across facilities and proved sensitive to differences in product and facility characteristics. Case study cost estimates ranged between €23 033 and €190 799 Euros per batch, with batch yield varying between 1 and 88 doses. The cost estimations revealed hidden costs to developers and provided insights into cost drivers to help design manufacturing best practices.
CONCLUSIONS
This framework and methodology provide step-by-step guidance to estimate manufacturing costs specifically for cell-based therapies manufactured in academic and other small-scale enterprises. The framework and methodology can be used to inform and plan cost-conscious strategies for CBTs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32414635
pii: S1465-3249(20)30496-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.03.432
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

388-397

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Renske M T Ten Ham (RMT)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology of the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS); Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: R.M.T.tenHam@uu.nl.

Anke M Hövels (AM)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology of the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS).

Jarno Hoekman (J)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology of the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS); Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University.

Geert W J Frederix (GWJ)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology of the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS); Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University.

Hubert G M Leufkens (HGM)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology of the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS); Lygature, Utrecht.

Olaf H Klungel (OH)

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology of the Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS).

Inge Jedema (I)

Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Sabrina A J Veld (SAJ)

Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Tatjana Nikolic (T)

Department of Immunohematology and Blood transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Melissa Van Pel (M)

Department of Immunohematology and Blood transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Jaap J Zwaginga (JJ)

Department of Immunohematology and Blood transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Sanquin Research, Center for Clinical Transfusion Research and Jon J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Fong Lin (F)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Anna L de Goede (AL)

Department of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Gerty Schreibelt (G)

Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Sandy Budde (S)

Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

I Jolanda M de Vries (IJM)

Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Gwen M Wilkie (GM)

Advanced Therapeutics, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Harry Dolstra (H)

Laboratory of Haematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Hans Ovelgönne (H)

Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Pauline Meij (P)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Joanne C Mountford (JC)

Advanced Therapeutics, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Marc L Turner (ML)

Advanced Therapeutics, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Marcel H N Hoefnagel (MHN)

Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH