Deep neuromuscular block improves angiographic image quality during endovascular coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysm: a randomized clinical trial.


Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 02 03 2020
revised: 06 04 2020
accepted: 10 04 2020
pubmed: 18 5 2020
medline: 27 1 2021
entrez: 17 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neuromuscular block (NMB) used during general anesthesia induces transient skeletal muscle paralysis, but patient movements during endovascular coiling still occur to some degree. Compared with moderate NMB, deep NMB may further improve the intervention condition during endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms; however, little research has focused on the angiographic image quality. This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 58 patients treated for unruptured cerebral aneurysms with endovascular coiling under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to either the deep NMB group (post-tetanic count 1 or 2) or the moderate NMB group (train-of-four 1 or 2). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a satisfactory intervention condition assessed by surgeons after the procedure using a 5-point intervention condition rating scale (ICRS) from 1 (unable to obtain image) to 5 (optimal); ICRS 5 was defined as satisfactory. There were significantly more cases of satisfactory intervention condition in the deep NMB group than in the moderate NMB group (82.1% vs 51.7%, p=0.015). The frequency of each ICRS score was significantly different between the groups (ICRS 5/4/3/2/1: 23/5/0/0/0 vs 15/9/2/3/0, p=0.035). The incidence of major patient movement requiring rescue muscle relaxant was 10.3% in the moderate NMB group and 0% in the deep NMB group (p=0.237). The drugs used to maintain hemodynamic stability were not significantly different between the two groups. Deep NMB improves the intervention condition during endovascular coiling by improving the image quality.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Neuromuscular block (NMB) used during general anesthesia induces transient skeletal muscle paralysis, but patient movements during endovascular coiling still occur to some degree. Compared with moderate NMB, deep NMB may further improve the intervention condition during endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms; however, little research has focused on the angiographic image quality.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial included 58 patients treated for unruptured cerebral aneurysms with endovascular coiling under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to either the deep NMB group (post-tetanic count 1 or 2) or the moderate NMB group (train-of-four 1 or 2). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a satisfactory intervention condition assessed by surgeons after the procedure using a 5-point intervention condition rating scale (ICRS) from 1 (unable to obtain image) to 5 (optimal); ICRS 5 was defined as satisfactory.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were significantly more cases of satisfactory intervention condition in the deep NMB group than in the moderate NMB group (82.1% vs 51.7%, p=0.015). The frequency of each ICRS score was significantly different between the groups (ICRS 5/4/3/2/1: 23/5/0/0/0 vs 15/9/2/3/0, p=0.035). The incidence of major patient movement requiring rescue muscle relaxant was 10.3% in the moderate NMB group and 0% in the deep NMB group (p=0.237). The drugs used to maintain hemodynamic stability were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Deep NMB improves the intervention condition during endovascular coiling by improving the image quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32414888
pii: neurintsurg-2020-015947
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015947
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1137-1141

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Bo Young Kim (BY)

Graduate School, Department of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Sung Hoon Chung (SH)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Seong-Joo Park (SJ)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Sung-Hee Han (SH)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

O-Ki Kwon (OK)

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Jun-Young Chung (JY)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Jin-Hee Kim (JH)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea anesing1@snu.ac.kr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH