Radiation dose of chaperones during common pediatric computed tomography examinations.


Journal

Pediatric radiology
ISSN: 1432-1998
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365332

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 23 10 2019
accepted: 15 04 2020
revised: 02 03 2020
pubmed: 18 5 2020
medline: 4 5 2021
entrez: 17 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

One main challenge in pediatric imaging is to reduce motion artifacts by calming young patients. To that end, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) as early as 1997 stated the necessity of adults accompanying their child during the child's examination. Nonetheless, current research lacks data regarding radiation dose to these chaperones. The aim of this study was to measure the radiation dose of accompanying adults during state-of-the-art pediatric CT protocols. In addition to a 100-kV non-contrast-enhanced chest CT (Protocol 1), we performed a 70-kV contrast-enhanced chest protocol (Protocol 2) using a third-generation dual-source CT. We acquired data on the radiation dose around the scanner using digital dosimetry placed right at the gantry, 1 m away, as well as beside the gantry. We acquired the CT-surrounding radiation dose during scanning of a pediatric phantom as well as 12 pediatric patients. After conducting 10 consecutive phantom scans using Protocol 1, we found the location with the highest cumulative dose acquired was right next to the gantry opening, at 3 μSv. Protocol 2 showed highest cumulative dose of 2 μSv at the same location. For Protocol 1, the location with the highest radiation doses during pediatric scans was right next to the gantry opening, with doses of 0.75±0.70 μSv. For Protocol 2, the highest radiation was measured 1 m away at 0.50±0.60 μSv. No radiation dose was measured at any time beside the gantry. Our results provide proof that chaperones receive low radiation doses during state-of-the-art CT examinations. Given knowledge of these values as well as the optimal spots with the lowest radiation doses, parents as well as patients might be more relaxed during the examination.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
One main challenge in pediatric imaging is to reduce motion artifacts by calming young patients. To that end, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) as early as 1997 stated the necessity of adults accompanying their child during the child's examination. Nonetheless, current research lacks data regarding radiation dose to these chaperones.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to measure the radiation dose of accompanying adults during state-of-the-art pediatric CT protocols.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In addition to a 100-kV non-contrast-enhanced chest CT (Protocol 1), we performed a 70-kV contrast-enhanced chest protocol (Protocol 2) using a third-generation dual-source CT. We acquired data on the radiation dose around the scanner using digital dosimetry placed right at the gantry, 1 m away, as well as beside the gantry. We acquired the CT-surrounding radiation dose during scanning of a pediatric phantom as well as 12 pediatric patients.
RESULTS
After conducting 10 consecutive phantom scans using Protocol 1, we found the location with the highest cumulative dose acquired was right next to the gantry opening, at 3 μSv. Protocol 2 showed highest cumulative dose of 2 μSv at the same location. For Protocol 1, the location with the highest radiation doses during pediatric scans was right next to the gantry opening, with doses of 0.75±0.70 μSv. For Protocol 2, the highest radiation was measured 1 m away at 0.50±0.60 μSv. No radiation dose was measured at any time beside the gantry.
CONCLUSION
Our results provide proof that chaperones receive low radiation doses during state-of-the-art CT examinations. Given knowledge of these values as well as the optimal spots with the lowest radiation doses, parents as well as patients might be more relaxed during the examination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32415324
doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04681-6
pii: 10.1007/s00247-020-04681-6
pmc: PMC7329757
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1078-1082

Références

Br J Radiol. 2007 Aug;80(956):657-67
pubmed: 17762056
Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Sep;41 Suppl 2:461-6
pubmed: 21847723
Br J Radiol. 2006 Nov;79(947):888-92
pubmed: 16728413
Radiographics. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4):939-59
pubmed: 9225392
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Aug 1;167(8):700-7
pubmed: 23754213
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Aug;84(8):1608-1613
pubmed: 26001437
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505
pubmed: 22681860
Br J Radiol. 1992 Jan;65(769):44-9
pubmed: 1486367
Invest Radiol. 2017 Mar;52(3):155-162
pubmed: 27662576
Z Med Phys. 2019 Feb;29(1):66-76
pubmed: 30563737

Auteurs

Daniel Overhoff (D)

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Meike Weis (M)

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Philipp Riffel (P)

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Sonja Sudarski (S)

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Matthias F Froelich (MF)

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Peter Fries (P)

Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße - Gebäude 50.1, Homburg, 66421, Germany.

Stefan Schönberg (S)

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Joshua Gawlitza (J)

Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße - Gebäude 50.1, Homburg, 66421, Germany. joshua.gawlitza@uks.eu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH