The revised Psychosis Attachment Measure: Measuring disorganized attachment.
Psychosis
adult attachment
attachment
disorganized attachment
measure
Journal
The British journal of clinical psychology
ISSN: 0144-6657
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8105533
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
08
11
2019
revised:
03
03
2020
pubmed:
18
5
2020
medline:
16
1
2021
entrez:
17
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Psychosis Attachment Measure (PAM) is currently the most widely used and validated measure of attachment in psychosis. However, the PAM does not assess disorganized attachment, the type of attachment that has been most closely linked with vulnerability to psychosis. This study aimed to expand the PAM to capture the concept of disorganized attachment and to examine its psychometric properties in a psychosis sample. Clinical and academic experts in the field of psychosis and service user representatives were asked to assess the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the pool of disorganized items. This process resulted in 12 items hypothesized to capture disorganized attachment that were included with the original items of the PAM. A sample of 144 individuals with either a self-reported diagnosis of, or treatment for, a psychosis-related condition completed a battery of online measures comprising the revised PAM, existing measures of adult disorganized attachment and constructs hypothesized to be conceptually related to disorganized attachment. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted with three factors retained; these were labelled anxious, avoidant and disorganized attachment. The factors displayed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability and the disorganized factor displayed good construct validity with related measures and constructs. These results provide preliminary evidence that the revised PAM captures the concept of disorganized attachment. However, confirmatory psychometric evaluation of the revised PAM is required, within a separate psychosis sample, to confirm its factor structure. The relationship between these results and the current literature, in addition to the clinical and research implications, are discussed. We present an expanded version of the Psychosis Attachment Measure (PAM), revised to capture the concept of disorganised attachment in adulthood. This expanded measure showed good reliability and the new disorganized subscale demonstrated construct validity. These results provide preliminary evidence that disorganized attachment can be measured using a simple self-report measure with individuals with psychosis. Further research is required to confirm the structural dimensionality of the revised PAM within a new sample using confirmatory factor analysis. Following further psychometric validation the use of this measure has the potential to be expanded to other mental health conditions in which disorganized attachment has been implicated in the development and maintenance of difficulties, for example, trauma-related conditions and borderline personality disorder.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32415698
doi: 10.1111/bjc.12249
pmc: PMC7496745
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
335-353Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Références
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Jun;38(4):661-71
pubmed: 22461484
Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):408-15
pubmed: 19162314
Attach Hum Dev. 2006 Jun;8(2):89-111
pubmed: 16818417
Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:67-76
pubmed: 18480098
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):387-403
pubmed: 7777645
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:138-55
pubmed: 26117061
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;15(2):151-70
pubmed: 20103564
Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(1):101-12
pubmed: 15176765
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;43(2):118-28
pubmed: 19153919
Child Dev. 1997 Aug;68(4):571-91
pubmed: 9306636
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1189-93
pubmed: 25232144
Attach Hum Dev. 2002 Sep;4(2):133-61
pubmed: 12467506
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Dec;46(12):1275-82
pubmed: 18926521
Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):488-92
pubmed: 15200634
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 30;8:111
pubmed: 28713292
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:211-217
pubmed: 27721059
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195687
pubmed: 29649252
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Jan 25;30(1):3
pubmed: 32025957
J Trauma Dissociation. 2006;7(3):39-63
pubmed: 16873229
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Jun;38(4):734-40
pubmed: 22496540
Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;138(1):28-76
pubmed: 22082488
Psychol Psychother. 2013 Jun;86(2):164-82
pubmed: 23674467
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jan;247:243-249
pubmed: 27930965
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:77-83
pubmed: 27664549
Psychol Med. 2002 Feb;32(2):347-58
pubmed: 11866327
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Aug;61(2):226-44
pubmed: 1920064
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5
pubmed: 3640358
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Nov;24(6):1304-1312
pubmed: 28653442
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2011 May;16(3):193-217
pubmed: 20694861
Dev Psychopathol. 1999 Spring;11(2):225-49
pubmed: 16506532