Experiences of integrating community volunteers as extensions of the primary care team to help support older adults at home: a qualitative study.
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
/ organization & administration
Female
Focus Groups
Health Services for the Aged
/ organization & administration
Home Care Services
/ organization & administration
Humans
Male
Ontario
/ epidemiology
Patient Care Team
Primary Health Care
/ methods
Professional Role
Psychosocial Support Systems
Self Efficacy
Volunteers
/ education
Home visits
Interprofessional teams
Older adults
Primary care
Qualitative research
Volunteers
Journal
BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 05 2020
16 05 2020
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
accepted:
10
05
2020
entrez:
18
5
2020
pubmed:
18
5
2020
medline:
10
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increasing the integration of community volunteers into primary health care delivery has the potential to improve person-focused, coordinated care, yet the use of volunteers in primary care is largely unexplored. Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY) is a multi-component intervention involving trained community volunteers functioning as extensions of primary care teams, supporting care based on older adults' health goals and needs. This study aimed to gain an understanding of volunteer experiences within the program and client and health care provider perspectives on the volunteer role. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach embedded in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants included Health TAPESTRY volunteers, health care providers, volunteer coordinator, and program clients, all connected to two primary care practice sites in a large urban setting in Ontario, Canada. Data collection included semi-structured focus groups and interviews with all participants, and the completion of a measure of attitudes toward older adults and self-efficacy for volunteers. Qualitative data were inductively coded and analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Overall, 30 volunteers and 64 other participants (clients, providers, volunteer coordinator) were included. Themes included: 1. Volunteer training: "An investment in volunteers"; 2. Intergenerational volunteer pairing: "The best of both worlds"; 3. Understanding the volunteer role and its scope: "Lay people involved in care"; 4. Volunteers as extensions of primary care teams: "Being the eyes where they live"; 5. The disconnect between volunteers and the clinical team: "Is something being done?"; 6. "Learning… all the time": Impacts on volunteers; and 7. Clients' acceptance of volunteers. This study showed that it is possible to integrate community volunteers into the primary care setting, adding human connections to deepen the primary care team's understanding of their patients. Program implementation suggestions that emerged included: using role play in training, making volunteer role boundaries and specifications clear, and making efforts to connect volunteers and the primary care team they are supporting. This exploration of stakeholder voices has the potential to help improve volunteer program uptake and acceptability, as well as volunteer recruitment, retention, and training. For RCT: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02283723, November 5, 2014.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Increasing the integration of community volunteers into primary health care delivery has the potential to improve person-focused, coordinated care, yet the use of volunteers in primary care is largely unexplored. Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY) is a multi-component intervention involving trained community volunteers functioning as extensions of primary care teams, supporting care based on older adults' health goals and needs. This study aimed to gain an understanding of volunteer experiences within the program and client and health care provider perspectives on the volunteer role.
METHODS
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach embedded in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants included Health TAPESTRY volunteers, health care providers, volunteer coordinator, and program clients, all connected to two primary care practice sites in a large urban setting in Ontario, Canada. Data collection included semi-structured focus groups and interviews with all participants, and the completion of a measure of attitudes toward older adults and self-efficacy for volunteers. Qualitative data were inductively coded and analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
Overall, 30 volunteers and 64 other participants (clients, providers, volunteer coordinator) were included. Themes included: 1. Volunteer training: "An investment in volunteers"; 2. Intergenerational volunteer pairing: "The best of both worlds"; 3. Understanding the volunteer role and its scope: "Lay people involved in care"; 4. Volunteers as extensions of primary care teams: "Being the eyes where they live"; 5. The disconnect between volunteers and the clinical team: "Is something being done?"; 6. "Learning… all the time": Impacts on volunteers; and 7. Clients' acceptance of volunteers.
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that it is possible to integrate community volunteers into the primary care setting, adding human connections to deepen the primary care team's understanding of their patients. Program implementation suggestions that emerged included: using role play in training, making volunteer role boundaries and specifications clear, and making efforts to connect volunteers and the primary care team they are supporting. This exploration of stakeholder voices has the potential to help improve volunteer program uptake and acceptability, as well as volunteer recruitment, retention, and training.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
For RCT: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02283723, November 5, 2014.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32416718
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01165-2
pii: 10.1186/s12875-020-01165-2
pmc: PMC7231411
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02283723']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
92Références
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jun;44(6):1157-66
pubmed: 22143109
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
Qual Life Res. 2011 Sep;20(7):987-95
pubmed: 21221815
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8 Suppl 2:S257-66
pubmed: 21918240
BMJ. 2011 Feb 07;342:d442
pubmed: 21300712
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Nov;46(11):1425-30
pubmed: 9809767
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1581-6
pubmed: 21963125
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD006903
pubmed: 18843736
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2015;34(1):46-65
pubmed: 25551169
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 26;5:48
pubmed: 29536010
Health Educ Res. 2013 Jun;28(3):426-36
pubmed: 23406721
CMAJ. 2019 May 6;191(18):E491-E500
pubmed: 31061074
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e026257
pubmed: 31201187
Public Health Nurs. 1992 Dec;9(4):242-7
pubmed: 1484814
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):831-65
pubmed: 12822915
J Card Fail. 2013 Dec;19(12):842-50
pubmed: 24331204
Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29
pubmed: 19460163
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 23;13:773
pubmed: 23968220
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):29-36
pubmed: 21353125
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1994 Jul-Aug;11(4):30-7
pubmed: 7893559
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Apr-May;25(2):121-6
pubmed: 18445862
Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1643-7
pubmed: 11089824
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013 Feb;29(2):152-60
pubmed: 23166062
J Aging Health. 2007 Aug;19(4):630-45
pubmed: 17682078
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):671.e9-671.e16
pubmed: 27346650
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Jan;39(1):78-89
pubmed: 22201658
Br Med J. 1979 Jul 14;2(6182):87-9
pubmed: 466329
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;45(4):378-83
pubmed: 11501726
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1505-33
pubmed: 25150681
BMJ. 1990 May 12;300(6734):1253-6
pubmed: 2354297
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):137-44
pubmed: 23508600
Arch Neurol. 1986 Jul;43(7):653-8
pubmed: 3524513
Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:20-6
pubmed: 22265645
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 05;11:49
pubmed: 27044360
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):247-53
pubmed: 20019321
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):96
pubmed: 29422057
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;19(4):392-6
pubmed: 21427644
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 15;21(1):63
pubmed: 32295524
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Dec;3(4):434-43
pubmed: 24294332
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):734-746
pubmed: 31777125
Int Nurs Rev. 2012 Sep;59(3):345-52
pubmed: 22897185
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 Feb;21(2):116-22
pubmed: 19228250
Gerontologist. 2007 Jun;47(3):398-403
pubmed: 17565104