Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for tongue space measurements in the field of orthodontics.
Airway volume
CBCT
Oral cavity air capacity
Tongue space
Tongue volume
Journal
Oral radiology
ISSN: 1613-9674
Titre abrégé: Oral Radiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8806621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
26
03
2020
accepted:
03
05
2020
pubmed:
18
5
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
18
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurately measuring tongue space is challenging, but this information can be useful to many dental specialties. This study was intended to estimate the reliability of using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure tongue space, which includes tongue volume and the oral cavity air capacity. For this preliminary study, CBCT images from ten participants (five females and five males, mean age of 29.8 ± 3.3 years) were available for evaluation. Each participant was radiographed two times (T0 and T1). The average time between T0 and T1 was 15.8 ± 3.7 days. CBCT scans were standardized to reduce variability. Three-dimensional landmarks were established to identify tongue space and 3D image analysis software (SimPlant The intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs of the CBCT measurements at T0 were excellent (> 0.90). Measurements for T0 vs. T1 show good (0.75-0.90) intra-rater and excellent (> 0.90) inter-rater reliability. Bland-Altman charts show that 90-95% of the total measurements fall within the 95% limits of agreement for both intra- and inter-rater pairs CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preliminary study suggest that the landmarks chosen to measure the overall tongue space are reproducible and can be measured clearly using CBCT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32418067
doi: 10.1007/s11282-020-00443-0
pii: 10.1007/s11282-020-00443-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
256-266Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Kadhum MA. Assessment of tongue space are in a sample of Iraqi adults with Class I dental and skeletal pattern. J Bagh Coll Dentistry. 2015;27:117–20.
doi: 10.12816/0015274
Vig PS, Cohen AM. The size of the tongue and intermaxillary space. Angle Orthod. 1975;44:25–8.
Cohen AM, Vig PS. A serial growth study of the tongue and intermaxillary space. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:332–6.
pubmed: 1067768
Ardran GM, Kemp FH. A functional assessment of relative tongue size. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1972;114:282–8.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.114.2.282
Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:1–19.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140282
Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:367–78.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/15779208
Alpern M. Diagnosing functional tongue space. Orthod Prod 2011.
Waese S. Concern about space for the tongue. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthod. 2011;140:756.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.10.008
Takada K, Sakuda M, Yoshida K, Kawamura Y. Relations between tongue volume and capacity of the oral cavity proper. J Dent Res. 1980;59:2026–31.
doi: 10.1177/00220345800590120101
Uysal T, Yagci A, Ucar FU, Veli I, Ozer T. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of relationship between tongue volume and lower incisor irregularity. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35:555–62.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr054
Liegeois F, Albert A, Limme M. Comparison between tongue volume from magnetic resonance images and tongue are from profile cephalograms. Eur J Orthod. 2009;32:381–6.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp105
Lauder R, Muhl Z. Estimation of tongue volume from magnetic resonance imaging. Angle Orthod. 1991;61:175–84.
pubmed: 1928821
Tseng Y, Wu J, Chen C, Hsu K. Correlation between change of tongue area and skeletal stability after correction of mandibular prognathism. Kaoshiung J Med Sci. 2017;33:302–7.
Ding X, Suzuki S, Shiga M, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Moriayama K. Evaluation of tongue volume and oral cavity capacity using cone-beam computed tomography. Odontology. 2018;106:266–73.
doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0335-0
Roehm E. Computed tomographic measurement of tongue volume relative to its surrounding space. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1982;81:172.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90044-6
Lorenzoni D, Bolognese A, Daniela G, Fabio R, Sant’Anna E. Cone beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1–10.
doi: 10.1155/2012/813768
Ludlow JB, Walker C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144:802–17.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.013
Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Kakuno E, Kanomi R, et al. Tongue posture improvement and pharyngeal airway enlargement as secondary effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:235–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.014
Li HY, Chen NH, Wang CR, Shu YH, Wang PC. Use of 3-dimensional computed tomography scan to evaluate upper airway patency for patients undergoing sleep-disordered breathing surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:336–42.
doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00629-6
Cevidanes L, Oliveira AEF, Motta A, Phillips C, Burke B, Tyndall D. Head orientation in CBCT-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:971–7.
doi: 10.2319/090208-460.1
Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: CBCT vs. conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:312–410.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.009
Park JH, Kim S, Lee YJ, Bayome M, Kook YA, Hong M, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary dentoalveolar changes and airway space after distalization in adults. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:187–94.
doi: 10.2319/121116-889.1
Chen Y, Hong L, Wang CL, Zhang SJ, Cao C, Wei F, et al. Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:964–70.
doi: 10.2319/110211-675.1
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc B. 1983;32:307–17.
Hatcher D. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:3S–6S.
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0359
Shah A. Use of MRI in orthodontics—a review. J Imaging Interv Radiol. 2017;1:1–3.
Tai K, Park JH, Hayashi K, Yanagi Y, Asaumi JI, Iida S. Preliminary study evaluating the accuracy of MRI images on CBCT images in the field of orthodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36(2):211–8.
doi: 10.17796/jcpd.36.2.r7853hp574045414
Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod. 2004;31:154–62.
doi: 10.1179/146531204225020472
Ryan DP, Bianchi J, Ignácio J, Wolford LM, Gonçalves JR. Cone-beam computed tomography airway measurements: can we trust them? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;156:53–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.024
Winnberg A, Pancherz H, Westesson PL. Head posture and hyo-mandibular function in man. A synchronized electromyographic and videofluorographic study of the open-close-clench cycle. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:393–404.
doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90128-X
Muto T, Kanazawa M. Positional change of the hyoid bone at maximal mouth opening. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;77:451–5.
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90222-4
Sahin Sağlam AM, Uydas NE. Relationship between head posture and hyoid position in adult females and males. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:85–92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.07.012
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated life-time attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427
Kieser JA, Farland MG, Jack H, Farella M, Wang Y, Rohrle O. The role of oral soft tissues in swallowing function: what can tongue pressure tell us? Aust Dent J. 2014;59:155–61.
doi: 10.1111/adj.12103
Mete A, Akbudak IH. Functional anatomy and physiology of airway. Intech Open J. 2018;89:3–21.
Oh CH, Ji GY, Yoon SH, Hyun D, Choi CG, Lim HK, et al. Surface landmarks do not correspond to exact levels of the cervical spine: references according to the sex, age and height. Korean J Spine. 2014;11:178–82.
doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.178
Mattos CT, Cruz CV, da Matta TC, Pereira LA, Solon-de-Mello PA, Ruelas AC, et al. Reliability of upper airway linear, area, and volumetric measurements in cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145:188–97.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.013