Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of multilayer cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived longitudinal and circumferential strain.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) multilayer reproducibility

Journal

Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy
ISSN: 2223-3652
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101601613

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez: 19 5 2020
pubmed: 19 5 2020
medline: 19 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Multilayer strain measurement with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) allows independent assessment of endocardial and epicardial strain. This novel method of layer-specific quantification of myocardial deformation parameters provides greater insight into contractility compared to whole-layer strain analysis. The clinical utility of this technique is promising. The aim of this study is to investigate the intra- and inter- observer reproducibility of CMR-FT derived multilayer global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) parameters in the setting of normal cardiac function, cardiac pathology, and differing MRI field strengths. We studied 4 groups of 20 subjects, comprising of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, and patients without cardiac pathology at both 1.5 and 3 T. Quantitative measures of whole-layer and multi-layer longitudinal and circumferential strain were calculated using CMR-FT software. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intraobserver reproducibility of endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer measurements of GLS were 0.979, 0.980, and 0.978 respectively, and those for GCS were 0.986, 0.977, and 0.985. ICCs for inter-observer reproducibility of endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer measurements of GLS were 0.976, 0.970, and 0.976, and those for GCS were 0.982, 0.969, and 0.981. Bland Altman analysis showed minimal bias and acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) within each patient subgroup and the overall cohort. Circumferential and longitudinal strain parameters were equally reproducible in the overall cohort. CMR-FT derived multilayer measurements of longitudinal and circumferential strain demonstrate high intra- and inter- observer reproducibility, with suitability for use in clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Multilayer strain measurement with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) allows independent assessment of endocardial and epicardial strain. This novel method of layer-specific quantification of myocardial deformation parameters provides greater insight into contractility compared to whole-layer strain analysis. The clinical utility of this technique is promising. The aim of this study is to investigate the intra- and inter- observer reproducibility of CMR-FT derived multilayer global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) parameters in the setting of normal cardiac function, cardiac pathology, and differing MRI field strengths.
METHODS METHODS
We studied 4 groups of 20 subjects, comprising of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, and patients without cardiac pathology at both 1.5 and 3 T. Quantitative measures of whole-layer and multi-layer longitudinal and circumferential strain were calculated using CMR-FT software.
RESULTS RESULTS
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intraobserver reproducibility of endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer measurements of GLS were 0.979, 0.980, and 0.978 respectively, and those for GCS were 0.986, 0.977, and 0.985. ICCs for inter-observer reproducibility of endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer measurements of GLS were 0.976, 0.970, and 0.976, and those for GCS were 0.982, 0.969, and 0.981. Bland Altman analysis showed minimal bias and acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) within each patient subgroup and the overall cohort. Circumferential and longitudinal strain parameters were equally reproducible in the overall cohort.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
CMR-FT derived multilayer measurements of longitudinal and circumferential strain demonstrate high intra- and inter- observer reproducibility, with suitability for use in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32420097
doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.10
pii: cdt-10-02-173
pmc: PMC7225436
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

173-182

Informations de copyright

2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2020.01.10). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Eur J Radiol. 2015 May;84(5):840-8
pubmed: 25743248
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0193746
pubmed: 29538467
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Mar;10(2):303-8
pubmed: 18801725
Clin Radiol. 2015 Sep;70(9):989-98
pubmed: 26139384
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0168349
pubmed: 28036335
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jan 18;15:8
pubmed: 23331550
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;8(12):1444-1460
pubmed: 26699113
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 May;32(5):624-632.e11
pubmed: 30878251
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Feb;3(2):144-51
pubmed: 20159640
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun;14(6):570-8
pubmed: 23148082
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 May 31;14:32
pubmed: 22650308
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 1;108(3):340-7
pubmed: 21600544
Heart. 2011 May;97(9):748-56
pubmed: 21415076
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(21):1673-80
pubmed: 24860005
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):e004077
pubmed: 27009468
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May;6(5):535-44
pubmed: 23582354
World J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 26;7(12):948-60
pubmed: 26730301
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Oct 17;15:95
pubmed: 24134158
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May;17(5):525-32
pubmed: 26377901
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):267
pubmed: 31775656
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Aug 26;18(1):51
pubmed: 27561421
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Apr 28;53(17):1475-87
pubmed: 19389557
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1419-1429
pubmed: 29361479
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(12):1467-76
pubmed: 19351689
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1433-1444
pubmed: 29454776
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(4):363-71
pubmed: 24293146
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1000-12
pubmed: 24677420

Auteurs

Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan (S)

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Bossley Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Echo Deng (E)

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Bossley Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Giuseppe Femia (G)

Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.

Simon Tang (S)

Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.

Eng-Siew Koh (ES)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.

Andreas Schuster (A)

Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, The Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Raj Puranik (R)

Cardiology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Pankaj Gupta (P)

Cardiology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Tuan Nguyen (T)

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Bossley Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.

Hany Dimitri (H)

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Bossley Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.

James Otton (J)

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Bossley Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH