Sense of coherence and burnout among school psychologists: The moderating role of loneliness.
Burnout
Coping
Loneliness
School psychologists
Sense of coherence
Journal
Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)
ISSN: 1046-1310
Titre abrégé: Curr Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8912263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
pubmed:
19
5
2020
medline:
19
5
2020
entrez:
19
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
School psychologist have been considered at a high risk for developing work burnout due to their multiple responsibilities, overload and engagement in caring for children, families and professionals. In line with the salutogenic approach, the aim of the current research was to investigate protective and risk factors to burnout. Research has indicated that sense of coherence (SOC) may act as a protective factor. Studies reported that loneliness has been found a risk factor that may advance burnout. The current study hypothesized that loneliness may moderate the link between SOC and burnout. In a sample of 104 Israeli school psychologists, demographic aspects such as the gender, years of experience, or type of school in which they work did not predict the burnout, focusing on the importance of emotional aspects. The analysis demonstrated that the SOC was negatively associated with burnout among low or mean levels of loneliness, but not among psychologists with high levels of loneliness. The current study provides a new insight into the burnout risk, through the focus on personal resources and social perceptions. Implications for theoretical and practices are further discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32421100
doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00766-5
pii: 766
pmc: PMC7223598
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2390-2397Informations de copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
pubmed: 18697684
BMC Nurs. 2019 Feb 18;18:5
pubmed: 30820188
Psychol Health. 2001 Sep;16(5):607-11
pubmed: 22804502
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189874
pubmed: 29293522
Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24
pubmed: 2648906
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jul;46(7):877-86
pubmed: 18462706
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):2041-50
pubmed: 25981240
Stress Health. 2016 Dec;32(5):597-606
pubmed: 26680339
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Dec;53(6):523-7
pubmed: 23170866
Occup Med (Lond). 2000 Sep;50(7):512-7
pubmed: 11198677
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):617-23
pubmed: 26692975
J Behav Med. 2016 Oct;39(5):832-44
pubmed: 27287618
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Dec;73(12):1782-1796
pubmed: 28505385
Acta Biomed. 2019 Mar 28;90(4-S):25-31
pubmed: 30977746
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;26(6):695-718
pubmed: 16952717
Arch Suicide Res. 2012;16(4):303-15
pubmed: 23137220