False-negative results on computer-aided detection software in preoperative automated breast ultrasonography of breast cancer patients.

Automated breast ultrasound Breast neoplasms Computer-assisted detection Ultrasonography

Journal

Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 2288-5919
Titre abrégé: Ultrasonography
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101626019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 18 11 2019
accepted: 24 03 2020
pubmed: 20 5 2020
medline: 20 5 2020
entrez: 20 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to measure the cancer detection rate of computer-aided detection (CAD) software in preoperative automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) of breast cancer patients and to determine the characteristics associated with false-negative outcomes. A total of 129 index lesions (median size, 1.7 cm; interquartile range, 1.2 to 2.4 cm) from 129 consecutive patients (mean age±standard deviation, 53.4±11.8 years) who underwent preoperative ABUS from December 2017 to February 2018 were assessed. An index lesion was defined as a breast cancer confirmed by ultrasonography (US)-guided core needle biopsy. The detection rate of the index lesions, positive predictive value (PPV), and false-positive rate (FPR) of the CAD software were measured. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify clinical and US findings associated with false-negative outcomes. The detection rate of the CAD software was 0.84 (109 of 129; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.90). The PPV and FPR were 0.41 (221 of 544; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.45) and 0.45 (174 of 387; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.50), respectively. False-negative outcomes were more frequent in asymptomatic patients (P<0.001) and were associated with the following US findings: smaller size (P=0.001), depth in the posterior third (P=0.002), angular or indistinct margin (P<0.001), and absence of architectural distortion (P<0.001). The CAD software showed a promising detection rate of breast cancer. However, radiologists should judge whether CAD software-marked lesions are true- or false-positive lesions, considering its low PPV and high FPR. Moreover, it would be helpful for radiologists to consider the characteristics associated with false-negative outcomes when reading ABUS with CAD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32422696
pii: usg.19076
doi: 10.14366/usg.19076
pmc: PMC7758101
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

83-92

Subventions

Organisme : Seoul National University

Références

Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2996-3006
pubmed: 29417251
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):592-601
pubmed: 28828640
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):851-9
pubmed: 23568482
Acta Radiol. 2011 Feb 1;52(1):8-14
pubmed: 21498319
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2869-72
pubmed: 25570590
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):747-54
pubmed: 21862820
Acta Radiol. 2015 Oct;56(10):1163-70
pubmed: 25280476
Radiographics. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):663-683
pubmed: 29624482
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Sep;32(9):1698-706
pubmed: 23693128
Acta Radiol. 2016 Feb;57(2):162-9
pubmed: 25766727
Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):642-59
pubmed: 23970509
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):224-35
pubmed: 22733916
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Feb;99:138-145
pubmed: 29362145
Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 May;52(3):539-46
pubmed: 24792655
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63
pubmed: 18477782
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Apr;78(1):99-103
pubmed: 21330080
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Jul;22(4):1218-1226
pubmed: 28796627
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e14146
pubmed: 30653149
Breast J. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):517-22
pubmed: 23009208
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Dec;39(12):2246-54
pubmed: 24035627
Ultrason Imaging. 2018 Mar;40(2):97-112
pubmed: 29182056
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):663-73
pubmed: 25329763
Eur Radiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):2557-64
pubmed: 20632009
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1554-63
pubmed: 27501888
Isr Med Assoc J. 2015 Jul;17(7):410-3
pubmed: 26357714
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Apr;3(2):027002
pubmed: 27158633
Ultrasonography. 2014 Apr;33(2):105-15
pubmed: 24936503
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S383-S390
pubmed: 29101979
Ultrasonography. 2015 Jul;34(3):165-72
pubmed: 25971900

Auteurs

Youngjune Kim (Y)

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Aerospace Medical Group, Air Force Education and Training Command, Jinju, Korea.

Jiwon Rim (J)

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Sun Mi Kim (SM)

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Bo La Yun (B)

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

So Yeon Park (SY)

Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Hye Shin Ahn (HS)

Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital,ChungAng University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Bohyoung Kim (B)

Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Korea.

Mijung Jang (M)

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Classifications MeSH