Austerity policy and child health in European countries: a systematic literature review.
Austerity
Child health
Child poverty
Economic crisis
Great recession
Social inequalities
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 May 2020
19 May 2020
Historique:
received:
27
02
2020
accepted:
19
04
2020
entrez:
20
5
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
26
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To analyse the impact of austerity measures taken by European governments as a response to the 2008 economic and financial crisis on social determinants on child health (SDCH), and child health outcomes (CHO). A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Sociological abstracts in the last 5 years from European countries. Studies aimed at analysing the Great Recession, governments' responses to the crisis, and its impact on SDCH were included. A narrative synthesis of the results was carried out. The risk of bias was assessed using the STROBE and EPICURE tools. Fourteen studies were included, most of them with a low to intermediate risk of bias (average score 72.1%). Government responses to the crisis varied, although there was general agreement that Greece, Spain, Ireland and the United Kingdom applied higher levels of austerity. High austerity periods, compared to pre-austerity periods were associated with increased material deprivation, child poverty rates, and low birth weight. Increasing child poverty subsequent to austerity measures was associated with deterioration of child health. High austerity was also related to poorer access and quality of services provided to disabled children. An annual reduction of 1% on public health expenditure was associated to 0.5% reduction on Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccination coverage in Italy. Countries that applied high level of austerity showed worse trends on SDCH and CHO, demonstrating the importance that economic policy may have for equity in child health and development. European governments must act urgently and reverse these austerity policy measures that are detrimental to family benefits and child protection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To analyse the impact of austerity measures taken by European governments as a response to the 2008 economic and financial crisis on social determinants on child health (SDCH), and child health outcomes (CHO).
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Sociological abstracts in the last 5 years from European countries. Studies aimed at analysing the Great Recession, governments' responses to the crisis, and its impact on SDCH were included. A narrative synthesis of the results was carried out. The risk of bias was assessed using the STROBE and EPICURE tools.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included, most of them with a low to intermediate risk of bias (average score 72.1%). Government responses to the crisis varied, although there was general agreement that Greece, Spain, Ireland and the United Kingdom applied higher levels of austerity. High austerity periods, compared to pre-austerity periods were associated with increased material deprivation, child poverty rates, and low birth weight. Increasing child poverty subsequent to austerity measures was associated with deterioration of child health. High austerity was also related to poorer access and quality of services provided to disabled children. An annual reduction of 1% on public health expenditure was associated to 0.5% reduction on Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccination coverage in Italy.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Countries that applied high level of austerity showed worse trends on SDCH and CHO, demonstrating the importance that economic policy may have for equity in child health and development. European governments must act urgently and reverse these austerity policy measures that are detrimental to family benefits and child protection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32423441
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08732-3
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-08732-3
pmc: PMC7236143
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
564Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0802448
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P008577/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
BMJ. 2016 Sep 06;354:i4631
pubmed: 27599996
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(suppl_4):18-21
pubmed: 29028245
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 12;8(10):e022932
pubmed: 30317184
BMJ. 2016 Jan 19;532:i335
pubmed: 26785865
Lancet. 2013 Apr 13;381(9874):1323-31
pubmed: 23541059
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1438-1448
pubmed: 29370331
BMJ. 2015 Oct 13;351:h5330
pubmed: 26466822
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Aug;45(18_suppl):41-47
pubmed: 28850010
Qual Health Res. 2009 Oct;19(10):1504-16
pubmed: 19805812
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun;11(6):6528-46
pubmed: 25019121
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Mar;61(3):329-336
pubmed: 30028502
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Aug;45(18_suppl):48-55
pubmed: 28850012
Ann Hum Biol. 2016;43(2):144-53
pubmed: 26727037
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9
pubmed: 25046131
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 14;14:95
pubmed: 26463522
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Aug 1;3(1):e000503
pubmed: 31423469
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Aug;45(18_suppl):3-8
pubmed: 28850008
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Dec 1;28(6):1116-1121
pubmed: 29788184
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):123-127
pubmed: 30215716
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):564-568
pubmed: 30890592
Pediatr Res. 2014 Nov;76(5):418-24
pubmed: 25122581
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 May;62(5):387-90
pubmed: 18413449
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Nov;84:102322
pubmed: 31674329
Arch Dis Child. 2016 May;101(5):489-96
pubmed: 26471112
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 2;9(10):e029424
pubmed: 31578197
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;63(4):352-358
pubmed: 28351293