Community pharmacy teams' experiences of general practice-based pharmacists: an exploratory qualitative study.
Community pharmacy
England
Experiences
General practice
Qualitative study
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 May 2020
18 May 2020
Historique:
received:
12
08
2019
accepted:
21
04
2020
entrez:
20
5
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In England, since 2015, there has been a formal drive to integrate pharmacists into general practice as a new healthcare service. Research efforts have offered insights into how general practice-based professionals and patients view the service, however, they took no account of community pharmacy teams' opinions. There have been anecdotal statements about opposition from community pharmacies to the service, due to fears of losing business. The aim of the current study was to identify the experiences and perceptions of community pharmacy teams regarding pharmacists' presence in general practice. The National Health Service Choices website was used to identify community pharmacies within a radius of two miles from eight West London general practices. The search resulted in 104 community pharmacies which were all contacted via telephone. Pharmacy staff who verbally expressed their interest to participate were then provided with the study's documents. Qualitative, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted inside the pharmacy from which each participant was recruited. Interviews lasted 30 to 45 min and were audio-recorded. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts analysed thematically. Forty-eight community pharmacy staff participated. Four themes were discerned: awareness ("I knew that [pharmacists] have already been implemented [in general practice] but I haven't really followed it … where does the pharmacist role come?"); interactions ("I'm just so pleased that there's a pharmacist professional in the general practice … because we speak the same language!"); patient care ("if I was a patient knowing that there is a general practitioner and a pharmacist [in general practice], I would … think 'nothing can go wrong at the moment'"); and funding challenges ("if general practices take on the extra responsibility of stop smoking or flu vaccination campaigns … financially, this would affect this pharmacy"). The current study revealed the perceived impact of general practice-based pharmacists on community pharmacies would be improved communication between pharmacies and practices. Findings will inform policy so that any future framing of pharmacists' presence in general practice considers the needs of community pharmacies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In England, since 2015, there has been a formal drive to integrate pharmacists into general practice as a new healthcare service. Research efforts have offered insights into how general practice-based professionals and patients view the service, however, they took no account of community pharmacy teams' opinions. There have been anecdotal statements about opposition from community pharmacies to the service, due to fears of losing business. The aim of the current study was to identify the experiences and perceptions of community pharmacy teams regarding pharmacists' presence in general practice.
METHODS
METHODS
The National Health Service Choices website was used to identify community pharmacies within a radius of two miles from eight West London general practices. The search resulted in 104 community pharmacies which were all contacted via telephone. Pharmacy staff who verbally expressed their interest to participate were then provided with the study's documents. Qualitative, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted inside the pharmacy from which each participant was recruited. Interviews lasted 30 to 45 min and were audio-recorded. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts analysed thematically.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-eight community pharmacy staff participated. Four themes were discerned: awareness ("I knew that [pharmacists] have already been implemented [in general practice] but I haven't really followed it … where does the pharmacist role come?"); interactions ("I'm just so pleased that there's a pharmacist professional in the general practice … because we speak the same language!"); patient care ("if I was a patient knowing that there is a general practitioner and a pharmacist [in general practice], I would … think 'nothing can go wrong at the moment'"); and funding challenges ("if general practices take on the extra responsibility of stop smoking or flu vaccination campaigns … financially, this would affect this pharmacy").
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The current study revealed the perceived impact of general practice-based pharmacists on community pharmacies would be improved communication between pharmacies and practices. Findings will inform policy so that any future framing of pharmacists' presence in general practice considers the needs of community pharmacies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32423485
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05245-y
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05245-y
pmc: PMC7236450
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
431Subventions
Organisme : University of Reading
ID : GS16-060
Références
Aust J Prim Health. 2018 Jan;24(6):448-454
pubmed: 30384879
J Prim Health Care. 2017 Dec;9(4):297-310
pubmed: 29530142
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Dec;54(12):1714-1717.e5
pubmed: 19074716
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):717-20
pubmed: 10756613
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Oct 15;6(4):
pubmed: 30326642
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 11;3(9):e003214
pubmed: 24030867
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2017 Oct 05;150(6):407-416
pubmed: 29123600
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):544-551
pubmed: 30629165
J Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec;32(6):648-654
pubmed: 29768945
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):623-32
pubmed: 24095088
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Apr 18;18(2):4
pubmed: 30127688
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Oct;68(675):e727-e734
pubmed: 30154077
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Apr;41(2):504-515
pubmed: 30879214
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 21;8:188
pubmed: 18803881
Am J Med Qual. 2003 Mar-Apr;18(2):51-8
pubmed: 12710553
Int J Pharm Pract. 2018 Dec;26(6):501-506
pubmed: 29280513
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Feb;45(1):105-114
pubmed: 31436893
Fam Med. 2018 Sep;50(8):605-612
pubmed: 30215820
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jun 09;8:233
pubmed: 26054529
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jan;16(1):17-24
pubmed: 30755373
Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Oct;34(10):1033-42
pubmed: 25142870
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):623-7
pubmed: 19748869
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Aug;53(493):607-13
pubmed: 14601336
J Pharm Pract. 2018 Oct;31(5):434-440
pubmed: 28718382
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 8;20(1):26
pubmed: 30736732
Int J Pharm Pract. 2012 Dec;20(6):395-401
pubmed: 23134099