The ophthalmic health and refractive state of working dogs in South Brazil.


Journal

Open veterinary journal
ISSN: 2218-6050
Titre abrégé: Open Vet J
Pays: Libya
ID NLM: 101653182

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 01 07 2019
accepted: 21 12 2019
entrez: 20 5 2020
pubmed: 20 5 2020
medline: 10 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Working dogs, such as police dogs and guide dogs, have important roles in the contemporary society by performing specific and demanding jobs. Ocular health and the maintenance of good visual acuity are imperative to strong work performance and thus human safety. The aim of this study was to assess ophthalmic abnormalities and refractive errors in police and guide dogs in Brazil. A total of 71 dogs (141 eyes) were evaluated. Ten were guide dogs and 61 were police dogs. The work performance was assessed by a questionnaire to each dog's handler/owner. All the dogs underwent a complete ocular examination, and abnormalities were classified by condition, if they were active or inactive and if they were located within the visual axis. In addition, 62 dogs were evaluated by streak retinoscopy for refractive errors. Ophthalmic abnormalities were detected in 38 (54%) dogs, of which 23 were considered inherited, 25 were considered active, and 10 were located within the visual axis. Incipient cataracts were the most prevalent abnormality. No guide dog had an abnormality within the visual axis. The most common refractive error was myopia with the median and interquartile range of -0.75 ± 0.75 diopters; among these, police dogs had -1.0 ± 0.5 diopters, whereas guide dogs +0.38 ± 0.75 diopters. Police dogs tended to be slightly myopic and guide dogs were emmetropic. Despite finding a considerable number of ophthalmic abnormalities and refractive error, work performance was good with no signs of visual impairment in any dog. Regular ophthalmic examinations are advised for working dogs, and an exclusion of severely affected dogs from breeding programs is recommended.

Sections du résumé

Background
Working dogs, such as police dogs and guide dogs, have important roles in the contemporary society by performing specific and demanding jobs. Ocular health and the maintenance of good visual acuity are imperative to strong work performance and thus human safety.
Aim
The aim of this study was to assess ophthalmic abnormalities and refractive errors in police and guide dogs in Brazil.
Methods
A total of 71 dogs (141 eyes) were evaluated. Ten were guide dogs and 61 were police dogs. The work performance was assessed by a questionnaire to each dog's handler/owner. All the dogs underwent a complete ocular examination, and abnormalities were classified by condition, if they were active or inactive and if they were located within the visual axis. In addition, 62 dogs were evaluated by streak retinoscopy for refractive errors.
Results
Ophthalmic abnormalities were detected in 38 (54%) dogs, of which 23 were considered inherited, 25 were considered active, and 10 were located within the visual axis. Incipient cataracts were the most prevalent abnormality. No guide dog had an abnormality within the visual axis. The most common refractive error was myopia with the median and interquartile range of -0.75 ± 0.75 diopters; among these, police dogs had -1.0 ± 0.5 diopters, whereas guide dogs +0.38 ± 0.75 diopters. Police dogs tended to be slightly myopic and guide dogs were emmetropic.
Conclusion
Despite finding a considerable number of ophthalmic abnormalities and refractive error, work performance was good with no signs of visual impairment in any dog. Regular ophthalmic examinations are advised for working dogs, and an exclusion of severely affected dogs from breeding programs is recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32426253
doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i1.5
pii: OVJ-10-22
pmc: PMC7193874
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

22-30

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Am J Vet Res. 2012 Apr;73(4):546-50
pubmed: 22452502
Am J Vet Res. 2008 Jul;69(7):946-51
pubmed: 18593249
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jun;40(7):1577-84
pubmed: 10359340
Vet Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):101-11
pubmed: 15762923
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Jul;33(8):2459-63
pubmed: 1634344
J Vet Med Sci. 2011 Jul;73(7):927-9
pubmed: 21321477
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 08;54(12):7324-8
pubmed: 24071952
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Feb;88(2):269-74
pubmed: 21169876
Am J Vet Res. 1997 Apr;58(4):414-8
pubmed: 9099390
J Vet Med Sci. 2017 Oct 20;79(10):1746-1748
pubmed: 28855430
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Oct 15;231(8):1215-20
pubmed: 17937551
Vet J. 2016 Jan;207:124-130
pubmed: 26616425
Vet Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;16(6):397-408
pubmed: 23240613
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2013 Nov-Dec;23(6):591-7
pubmed: 24102911
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995 Dec 15;207(12):1623-34
pubmed: 7493905
Surv Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul-Aug;48(4):452-8
pubmed: 12850233
Vet Pathol. 1987 Jan;24(1):22-7
pubmed: 3824819
Vet Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):337-47
pubmed: 16178845
Vet Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;16(5):319-23
pubmed: 23173899
Vet Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan-Feb;7(1):29-35
pubmed: 14738504
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4784-9
pubmed: 18566472
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1999 Feb;38(1):33-7
pubmed: 10198938
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0165414
pubmed: 27829045
Vet J. 1998 Jan;155(1):5-18
pubmed: 9455155
Pathol Vet. 1965;2(6):566-73
pubmed: 5892831
Vet Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;20(2):131-139
pubmed: 27061240
J Small Anim Pract. 1978 Feb;19(2):109-20
pubmed: 642468
Vet Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;21(5):524-529
pubmed: 29284193
Vision Res. 1997 Feb;37(3):365-70
pubmed: 9135869
Am J Vet Res. 2008 Oct;69(10):1336-40
pubmed: 18828692
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011 Mar 15;140(1-2):37-41
pubmed: 21144596
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Jul 15;219(2):209-14
pubmed: 11469577
Age (Dordr). 2011 Sep;33(3):451-60
pubmed: 20607428
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0176018
pubmed: 28423053

Auteurs

Juliana Kravetz de Oliveira (JK)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Mariza Bortolini (M)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Melissa Schaller (M)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Rafaela Kava Schuchmann (RK)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Bret A Moore (BA)

Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira (F)

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH