Healing Status of Meniscal Ramp Lesion Affects Anterior Knee Stability After ACL Reconstruction.
anterior cruciate ligament
anterior stability
ramp lesion
repair
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
20
5
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
20
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although the biomechanical importance of the ramp lesion in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee has been demonstrated, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate treatment for ramp lesions during ACL reconstruction. To compare the postoperative outcomes for ramp lesions between patients treated with all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal and those whose ramp lesions were left in situ without repair during ACL reconstruction. We also determined whether ramp lesion healing status affected postoperative knee stability. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A total of 57 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction between August 2011 and December 2017 had attendant ramp lesions. Of these, 25 ramp lesions that were considered stable were left in situ without repair (Nonrepaired group), and 25 ramp lesions, including 21 stable and 4 unstable lesions, were treated using all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal (Repaired group). We evaluated the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs and rotational stability by using the pivot-shift test 2 years after surgery, and healing status of the ramp lesions was evaluated on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1 year after surgery. The mean SSDs in anterior translation were 2.4 ± 1.6 mm for the Nonrepaired group and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm for the Repaired group, with no significant differences. The positive ratios on the pivot-shift test were not significantly different between groups. Healing rates of ramp lesions on MRI scans showed a significant difference between the Nonrepaired group (60%) and the Repaired group (100%) ( Healing rates of ramp lesions were significantly better in the Repaired group than in the Nonrepaired group, although postoperative knee stability was not significantly different between groups. Anterior laxity in the knees in which the ramp lesion was unhealed was significantly greater compared with the knees in which the ramp lesion healed. All-inside repair through the posteromedial portal was a reliable surgical procedure to heal ramp lesions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although the biomechanical importance of the ramp lesion in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee has been demonstrated, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate treatment for ramp lesions during ACL reconstruction.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To compare the postoperative outcomes for ramp lesions between patients treated with all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal and those whose ramp lesions were left in situ without repair during ACL reconstruction. We also determined whether ramp lesion healing status affected postoperative knee stability.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 57 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction between August 2011 and December 2017 had attendant ramp lesions. Of these, 25 ramp lesions that were considered stable were left in situ without repair (Nonrepaired group), and 25 ramp lesions, including 21 stable and 4 unstable lesions, were treated using all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal (Repaired group). We evaluated the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs and rotational stability by using the pivot-shift test 2 years after surgery, and healing status of the ramp lesions was evaluated on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1 year after surgery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean SSDs in anterior translation were 2.4 ± 1.6 mm for the Nonrepaired group and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm for the Repaired group, with no significant differences. The positive ratios on the pivot-shift test were not significantly different between groups. Healing rates of ramp lesions on MRI scans showed a significant difference between the Nonrepaired group (60%) and the Repaired group (100%) (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Healing rates of ramp lesions were significantly better in the Repaired group than in the Nonrepaired group, although postoperative knee stability was not significantly different between groups. Anterior laxity in the knees in which the ramp lesion was unhealed was significantly greater compared with the knees in which the ramp lesion healed. All-inside repair through the posteromedial portal was a reliable surgical procedure to heal ramp lesions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32426412
doi: 10.1177/2325967120917674
pii: 10.1177_2325967120917674
pmc: PMC7222250
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2325967120917674Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Jul;55(5):923-40
pubmed: 4760100
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):472-7
pubmed: 20097926
Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):691-8
pubmed: 25660007
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Jul;64(6):883-8
pubmed: 6896333
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1631-1637
pubmed: 29456068
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):2967-73
pubmed: 26264383
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2422-2431
pubmed: 29847148
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Apr;45(5):1004-1011
pubmed: 28060534
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2688-95
pubmed: 26430058
Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2269-2277
pubmed: 27184100
Arthroscopy. 2001 Mar;17(3):270-274
pubmed: 11239347
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):400-8
pubmed: 26657852
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):921-6
pubmed: 24567252
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jan;68(1):71-9
pubmed: 3753605
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1072-8
pubmed: 23571132
Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):240-51
pubmed: 16517306
Arthroscopy. 2004 Nov;20(9):936-45
pubmed: 15525926
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Mar;27(1):56-60
pubmed: 25750895
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Feb;92(2):222-3
pubmed: 20130312
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Mar;(252):80-7
pubmed: 2406078
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2230-5
pubmed: 22962296
Am J Sports Med. 2011 May;39(5):1008-17
pubmed: 21278428
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):832-7
pubmed: 21220541