Late effects of adjuvant chemotherapy adumbrate dormancy complexity in breast cancer.


Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 18 10 2019
revised: 30 04 2020
accepted: 04 05 2020
pubmed: 20 5 2020
medline: 20 3 2021
entrez: 20 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dormant avascular micrometastases and single, or small groups of, non-proliferating cells are currently assumed to explain the multipeak dynamics of distant metastases (DM) following primary breast cancer surgical removal. The hazard rate pattern for DM was analysed in 1518 premenopausal node-positive patients, enrolled in a series of randomized clinical trials on early breast cancer, which were carried out in Italy and Belgium. Patients underwent surgery alone (n = 397) or surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1121) and the minimal follow up was 15 years. The DM hazard rate for patients undergoing surgery alone displayed two early sharp peaks at 9 and 33 months, a wide intermediate one spanning from about 50 to 90 months and a late peak at 115-120 months. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a prominent reduction of the two early peaks leaving a residual one at about 18 months and a reduction of the intermediate peak leaving two small peaks at about 50 and 80 months. The late peak remained unchanged. Present results reveal the ability of adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce not only the rate of early relapses, but also the rate of intermediate relapses at about the sixth year of follow up. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not impacting on the development of metastases underlying the late peak detected at the tenth year. These findings suggest the existence of a previously unknown dormancy state that, at the primary tumour surgical removal, results in evolving chemo-sensitive metastatic processes, and, moreover, of a later chemo-refractory dormancy state.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Dormant avascular micrometastases and single, or small groups of, non-proliferating cells are currently assumed to explain the multipeak dynamics of distant metastases (DM) following primary breast cancer surgical removal.
METHODS METHODS
The hazard rate pattern for DM was analysed in 1518 premenopausal node-positive patients, enrolled in a series of randomized clinical trials on early breast cancer, which were carried out in Italy and Belgium. Patients underwent surgery alone (n = 397) or surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1121) and the minimal follow up was 15 years.
RESULTS RESULTS
The DM hazard rate for patients undergoing surgery alone displayed two early sharp peaks at 9 and 33 months, a wide intermediate one spanning from about 50 to 90 months and a late peak at 115-120 months. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a prominent reduction of the two early peaks leaving a residual one at about 18 months and a reduction of the intermediate peak leaving two small peaks at about 50 and 80 months. The late peak remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Present results reveal the ability of adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce not only the rate of early relapses, but also the rate of intermediate relapses at about the sixth year of follow up. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not impacting on the development of metastases underlying the late peak detected at the tenth year. These findings suggest the existence of a previously unknown dormancy state that, at the primary tumour surgical removal, results in evolving chemo-sensitive metastatic processes, and, moreover, of a later chemo-refractory dormancy state.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32428688
pii: S0960-9776(20)30109-0
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.05.002
pmc: PMC7375586
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

64-70

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Cancer Res. 1979 Oct;39(10):3861-5
pubmed: 476622
N Engl J Med. 1976 Feb 19;294(8):405-10
pubmed: 1246307
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 20;38(12):1293-1303
pubmed: 31618131
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;15(4):205-218
pubmed: 29283170
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 10;37(5):423-438
pubmed: 30452337
Nat Med. 1995 Feb;1(2):149-53
pubmed: 7585012
Cancer Res. 2002 Apr 1;62(7):2162-8
pubmed: 11929839
Biometrics. 2017 Mar;73(1):260-270
pubmed: 27398936
Breast. 2019 Jun;45:61-63
pubmed: 30878882
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 10;37(2):105-114
pubmed: 30475668
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 15;19(12):3103-10
pubmed: 11408507
Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
pubmed: 15894097
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Jan 3;82(1):4-6
pubmed: 1688381
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e88238
pubmed: 24586311
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Jun 19;39(1):35
pubmed: 31217037
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):107-18
pubmed: 24881463
BMJ. 2005 Jan 29;330(7485):217
pubmed: 15649903
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Dec;87:10-20
pubmed: 29096156
Cell. 2011 Oct 14;147(2):275-92
pubmed: 22000009
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2053-65
pubmed: 20519679
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 20;34(9):927-35
pubmed: 26786933
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1836-1846
pubmed: 29117498
Nature. 2005 Dec 8;438(7069):820-7
pubmed: 16341007
Cancers (Basel). 2010 Mar 30;2(2):305-37
pubmed: 24281072
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Apr;18(4):211-223
pubmed: 29422598
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 17;6(36):39307-28
pubmed: 26515727
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Jul;9(7):1124-30
pubmed: 2045854
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):65-73
pubmed: 25422485
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Jan 5;86(1):45-8
pubmed: 8271282
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Apr 11;10(436):
pubmed: 29643230
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;41(2):177-85
pubmed: 8944336
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Dec;9(12):2134-40
pubmed: 1960555
Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Sep;14(9):611-22
pubmed: 25118602
Ann Oncol. 2008 Nov;19(11):1821-8
pubmed: 18550576
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Apr;9(4):285-93
pubmed: 19308068
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 May;17(5):302-317
pubmed: 28303905
Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007 Dec;4(12):699-710
pubmed: 18037874
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):122-137
pubmed: 29863451

Auteurs

Romano Demicheli (R)

Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Campus Cascina Rosa, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumouri, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: romano.demicheli@guest.unimi.it.

Christine Desmedt (C)

Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: christine.desmedt@kuleuven.be.

Mike Retsky (M)

Harvard School of Public Health, BLDG I, Rm 1311, 665 Huntington, Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: micheal.retsky@gmail.com.

Christos Sotiriou (C)

Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, 1000, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: christos.sotiriou@bordet.be.

Martine Piccart (M)

Department of Oncology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, 1000, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: martine.piccart@bordet.be.

Elia Biganzoli (E)

Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics "Giulio A. Maccacaro", Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Campus Cascina Rosa, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumouri, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: elia.biganzoli@unimi.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH