C-arm orbits for metal artifact avoidance (MAA) in cone-beam CT.
Journal
Physics in medicine and biology
ISSN: 1361-6560
Titre abrégé: Phys Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 08 2020
19 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
20
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metal artifacts present a challenge to cone-beam CT (CBCT) image-guided surgery, obscuring visualization of metal instruments and adjacent anatomy-often in the very region of interest pertinent to the imaging/surgical tasks. We present a method to reduce the influence of metal artifacts by prospectively defining an image acquisition protocol-viz., the C-arm source-detector orbit-that mitigates metal-induced biases in the projection data. The metal artifact avoidance (MAA) method is compatible with simple mobile C-arms, does not require exact prior information on the patient or metal implants, and is consistent with 3D filtered backprojection (FBP), more advanced (e.g. polyenergetic) model-based image reconstruction (MBIR), and metal artifact reduction (MAR) post-processing methods. The MAA method consists of: (i) coarse localization of metal objects in the field-of-view (FOV) via two or more low-dose scout projection views and segmentation (e.g. a simple U-Net) in coarse backprojection; (ii) model-based prediction of metal-induced x-ray spectral shift for all source-detector vertices accessible by the imaging system (e.g. gantry rotation and tilt angles); and (iii) identification of a circular or non-circular orbit that reduces the variation in spectral shift. The method was developed, tested, and evaluated in a series of studies presenting increasing levels of complexity and realism, including digital simulations, phantom experiment, and cadaver experiment in the context of image-guided spine surgery (pedicle screw implants). The MAA method accurately predicted tilted circular and non-circular orbits that reduced the magnitude of metal artifacts in CBCT reconstructions. Realistic distributions of metal instrumentation were successfully localized (0.71 median Dice coefficient) from 2-6 low-dose scout views even in complex anatomical scenes. The MAA-predicted tilted circular orbits reduced root-mean-square error (RMSE) in 3D image reconstructions by 46%-70% and 'blooming' artifacts (apparent width of the screw shaft) by 20-45%. Non-circular orbits defined by MAA achieved a further ∼46% reduction in RMSE compared to the best (tilted) circular orbit. The MAA method presents a practical means to predict C-arm orbits that minimize spectral bias from metal instrumentation. Resulting orbits-either simple tilted circular orbits or more complex non-circular orbits that can be executed with a motorized multi-axis C-arm-exhibited substantial reduction of metal artifacts in raw CBCT reconstructions by virtue of higher fidelity projection data, which are in turn compatible with subsequent MAR post-processing and/or polyenergetic MBIR to further reduce artifacts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32428891
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9454
pmc: PMC8650760
mid: NIHMS1759390
doi:
Substances chimiques
Metals
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
165012Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB017226
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007057
Pays : United States
Références
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1904-16
pubmed: 22482612
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Feb;11312:
pubmed: 33177786
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 21;64(16):165021
pubmed: 31287092
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Apr;6(2):025002
pubmed: 31065569
Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1679-91
pubmed: 15537976
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Sep;33(5):285-90
pubmed: 15585803
Med Phys. 2010 Oct;37(10):5482-93
pubmed: 21089784
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Mar 21;49(6):941-59
pubmed: 15104318
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Jul;9(4):733-43
pubmed: 24078371
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 2):526-34
pubmed: 18982645
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996;15(5):657-64
pubmed: 18215947
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):144-155
pubmed: 29121409
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2699-708
pubmed: 25979068
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Apr;6(2):025004
pubmed: 31093518
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Oct;31(10):1837-48
pubmed: 22614574
Phys Med Biol. 1999 Nov;44(11):2835-51
pubmed: 10588288
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Dec;36(12):2424-2435
pubmed: 29035215
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 14;63(24):245018
pubmed: 30524041
Med Phys. 2006 Dec;33(12):4541-50
pubmed: 17278805
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jun;37(6):1370-1381
pubmed: 29870366
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1978 Jan;2(1):100-8
pubmed: 670461
Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4711
pubmed: 27487888
Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 01;80(3S):S86-S99
pubmed: 28350944
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):744-7
pubmed: 15364751
Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4700-13
pubmed: 21928644
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):421-7
pubmed: 17353306
Med Phys. 2014 Jun;41(6):061909
pubmed: 24877820
Deep Learn Med Image Anal Multimodal Learn Clin Decis Support (2017). 2017;2017:240-248
pubmed: 34104926
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):958-974
pubmed: 31863480
Med Phys. 2005 Jan;32(1):241-54
pubmed: 15719975
Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):252-5
pubmed: 4000088
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Jan;24(1):70-85
pubmed: 15638187
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):968-83
pubmed: 15895580
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(2):290-300
pubmed: 18218505
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):237-44
pubmed: 23513244
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):117-23
pubmed: 25539246