Preoperative factors to select vitrectomy or scleral buckling for retinal detachment in microincision vitrectomy era.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Choroid
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Microsurgery
/ methods
Middle Aged
Preoperative Period
Retinal Detachment
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Scleral Buckling
/ methods
Visual Acuity
Vitrectomy
/ methods
Young Adult
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Registry
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Risk factor
national data base
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
02
02
2020
accepted:
08
05
2020
revised:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
23
6
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the preoperative factors associated with selecting scleral buckling (SB) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in the era of microincision vitrectomy surgery. A nationwide, multicenter, observational study in the Japan Retinal Detachment Registry was done. From February 2016 to March 2017, 3446 cases were registered, and 3219 among them were analyzed. The factors related to the patient or surgeon were selected; the surgeon's factor included years of experience, number of cases registered, and current activity. The odds ratio (OR) for factors associated with SB or PPV was estimated by a mixed logistic regression model. SB was selected in 24.2% (779/3219), PPV was in 71.5% (2238/3219), and PPV+SB was in 6.3% (202/3219). Multivariate analysis showed that age [< 70 years old, OR 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.34-7.79, P < 0.001], visual acuity [1.0+ (OR 7.41, 95% CI 3.47-15.82, P < 0.001)], pseudo-phakia (OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.11-10.56, P < 0.001), retinal tear (OR 6.92, 95% CI 4.83-9.92, P < 0.001), breaks at/near the vitreous base (OR 8.07, 95% CI 3.50-18.62, P < 0.001), 90+° retinal tear (OR 108.24, 95% CI 7.44-1574.34, P < 0.001), and number of breaks 4+ (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.95-5.09, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with selecting PPV over SB. The surgeons' activity defined as the number of cases experienced during the registry period was related to the selection of PPV (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.11-6.93, P < 0.001). The choice of PPV for the RRD was associated not only with patients' preoperative factors but also the surgeon's activity. Active surgeons selected PPV more than SB.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To determine the preoperative factors associated with selecting scleral buckling (SB) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in the era of microincision vitrectomy surgery.
METHODS
METHODS
A nationwide, multicenter, observational study in the Japan Retinal Detachment Registry was done. From February 2016 to March 2017, 3446 cases were registered, and 3219 among them were analyzed. The factors related to the patient or surgeon were selected; the surgeon's factor included years of experience, number of cases registered, and current activity. The odds ratio (OR) for factors associated with SB or PPV was estimated by a mixed logistic regression model.
RESULTS
RESULTS
SB was selected in 24.2% (779/3219), PPV was in 71.5% (2238/3219), and PPV+SB was in 6.3% (202/3219). Multivariate analysis showed that age [< 70 years old, OR 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.34-7.79, P < 0.001], visual acuity [1.0+ (OR 7.41, 95% CI 3.47-15.82, P < 0.001)], pseudo-phakia (OR 4.83, 95%CI 2.11-10.56, P < 0.001), retinal tear (OR 6.92, 95% CI 4.83-9.92, P < 0.001), breaks at/near the vitreous base (OR 8.07, 95% CI 3.50-18.62, P < 0.001), 90+° retinal tear (OR 108.24, 95% CI 7.44-1574.34, P < 0.001), and number of breaks 4+ (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.95-5.09, P < 0.001), were significantly associated with selecting PPV over SB. The surgeons' activity defined as the number of cases experienced during the registry period was related to the selection of PPV (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.11-6.93, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The choice of PPV for the RRD was associated not only with patients' preoperative factors but also the surgeon's activity. Active surgeons selected PPV more than SB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32430633
doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04744-2
pii: 10.1007/s00417-020-04744-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1871-1880Références
Ah-Fat FG, Sharma MC, Majid MA et al (1999) Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996. Br J Ophthalmol 83:396–398
doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.4.396
pubmed: 10434858
pmcid: 1722995
Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:803–809
doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0399-y
pubmed: 17120014
Feltgen N, Heimann H, Hoerauf H et al (2013) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): risk assessment of anatomical outcome. SPR study report no. 7. Acta Ophthalmol 91:282–287
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02344.x
pubmed: 22336429
Heussen N, Hilgers RD, Heimann H et al (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): multiple-event analysis of risk factors for reoperations. SPR Study report no. 4. Acta Ophthalmol 89:622–628
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01766.x
pubmed: 19909291
Heussen N, Feltgen N, Walter P et al (2011) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): predictive factors for functional outcome. Study report no. 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1129–1136
doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1619-7
pubmed: 21305315
Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574
doi: 10.1007/s004170100319
pubmed: 11585312
Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N et al (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.013
pubmed: 18054633
Lauer MS, D'Agostino RB Sr (2013) The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med 369:1579–1581
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1310102
pubmed: 23991657
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI (2000) Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887–1892
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422507
pubmed: 10861325
pmcid: 1557642
Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY et al (2009) Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9-year nationwide population-based study. Eye (Lond) 23:669–675
doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703105
Park SJ, Cho SC, Choi NK et al (2017) Age, sex, and time-specific trends in surgical approaches for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a nationwide, population-based study using the national claim registry. Retina 37:2326–2333
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001485
pubmed: 28141750
Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sallam A et al (2014) United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 3, retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 121:643–648
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.015
pubmed: 23978624
Sallam AB, Donachie PHJ, Yorston D et al (2018) Royal college of ophthalmologists' national database study of vitreoretinal surgery: Report 7, Intersurgeon variations in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment failure. Retina 38:334–342
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001538
pubmed: 28221255
Parke Ii DW, Lum F, Rich WL (2017) The IRIS(R) Registry: purpose and perspectives. Ophthalmologe 114(Suppl 1):1–6
doi: 10.1007/s00347-016-0265-1
pubmed: 27306823
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2013) Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology 120:1804–1808
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.070
pubmed: 23601799
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Sipperley JO, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2013) Strategy for the management of complex retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 2. Ophthalmology 120:1809–1813
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.056
pubmed: 23601805
Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, Adelman RA, Group ERS (2014) How do vitrectomy parameters influence the results of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments repair? EVRS RD Study No. 3. Acta Ophthalmol 92:e416–e417
doi: 10.1111/aos.12318
pubmed: 24314312
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Michalewska Z, Ducournau D, European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study G (2014) Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4. Ophthalmology 121:1715–1719
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.012
pubmed: 24766870
Sakamoto T, Kawano S, Kawasaki R et al (2019) Japan-Retinal Detachment Registry Report I: preoperative findings in eyes with primary retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-019-00702-6
Wong CW, Wong WL, Yeo IY et al (2014) Trends and factors related to outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a large asian tertiary eye center. Retina 34:684–692
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182a48900
pubmed: 24169100
Smretschnig E, Falkner-Radler CI, Sporl J et al (2017) Primary retinal detachment surgery: changes in treatment and outcome in an austrian tertiary eye center. Ophthalmologica 237:55–62
doi: 10.1159/000454889
pubmed: 28068654
Reeves MG, Pershing S, Afshar AR (2018) Choice of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair method in US commercially insured and medicare advantage patients, 2003-2016. Am J Ophthalmol 196:82–90
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.024
pubmed: 30144442
Spitzer MS, Januschowski K (2015) Aging and age-related changes of the vitreous body. Ophthalmologe 112:552–558
doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0031-9
pubmed: 26002378
Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT et al (2010) Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 88:199–206
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01425.x
pubmed: 19432848
Rootman DB, Luu S, Conti SM et al (2013) Predictors of treatment failure for pneumatic retinopexy. Can J Ophthalmol 48:549–552
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.05.002
pubmed: 24314421
Wickham L, Ho-Yen GO, Bunce C et al (2011) Surgical failure following primary retinal detachment surgery by vitrectomy: risk factors and functional outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1234–1238
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.190306
pubmed: 21156702
Aaberg TM (1988) Management of anterior and posterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy. XLV. Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 106:519–532
doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90580-6
pubmed: 3056014
Sasaki K, Ideta H, Yonemoto J et al (1995) Epidemiologic characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Kumamoto, Japan. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:772–776
doi: 10.1007/BF00184088
pubmed: 8626085
Ung T, Comer MB, Ang AJ et al (2005) Clinical features and surgical management of retinal detachment secondary to round retinal holes. Eye (Lond) 19:665–669
doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701618
Chang S (2006) LXII Edward Jackson lecture: open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 141:1033–1043
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.014
pubmed: 16765671
Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves MG et al (2019) The relative impact of patient, physician, and geographic factors on variation in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management. Ophthalmology 127:97–106
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.019
pubmed: 30981916
Ehrlich R, Ahmad N, Welch S et al (2011) Vitreoretinal fellow surgical outcome of small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1147–1152
doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1638-4
pubmed: 21390512