Hypothermic machine perfusion after static cold storage improves ovarian function in rat ovarian tissue transplantation.
Animals
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
/ blood
Cold Temperature
Cryopreservation
/ methods
Female
Hypothermia, Induced
/ methods
Immunohistochemistry
Ki-67 Antigen
/ metabolism
Organ Preservation
/ methods
Ovarian Follicle
/ cytology
Ovariectomy
Ovary
/ cytology
Perfusion
Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
/ metabolism
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Fertility preservation
Hypothermic machine perfusion
Ovarian transplantation
Ovary
Rat
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
26
12
2019
accepted:
24
04
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
11
3
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study was performed to investigate the effect of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) after cold storage (CS) on ovarian transplantation. Rats aged 8-10 weeks were used as the donors and recipients for allotransplantation. Eighteen donor rats were divided into three groups: the fresh control (n = 6), cold storage (CS; n = 6), and hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP; n = 6) groups. The preservation solution contained Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 (1:1, v/v), 10% fetal bovine serum, 10 μg/ml insulin, 10 μg/ml transferrin, and 50 mIU/ml follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The donor ovaries in the CS and HMP groups were excised and then respectively subjected to 4 h of CS and 2 h of CS combined with 2 h of HMP at 4 °C, and then transplanted beneath the recipient's left renal capsule. At 7 days after transplantation, the ovaries were removed and blood samples were obtained for histological analysis, immunohistochemistry for CD31 and Ki67, and serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level estimation. The HMP group showed significant increases in serum AMH and CD31-positive areas when compared to these values in the CS group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were noted in the total number of follicles or the Ki67-positive areas among the three groups. Hypothermic machine perfusion after static cold storage is more effective than static CS alone for the short-term preservation of whole ovaries during transport. Whole ovary transplantation with vascular pedicle is our future research direction. Graphical Abstract The black rectangle in the figure shows the place where ligation and disconnection are required, the black dotted line shows the place where vascular forceps are used to clamp, and the black circle shows the place where the cannula is inserted This diagram was made for reviewers to understand more intuitively how my hypothermia mechanical perfusion model was built. Organs obtained in this way can be used for subsequent perfusion and whole ovarian transplantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32430732
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01797-4
pii: 10.1007/s10815-020-01797-4
pmc: PMC7376786
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ki-67 Antigen
0
Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
0
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
80497-65-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1745-1753Subventions
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of China.
ID : 81570079
Références
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1827-37
pubmed: 27312534
Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2627-38
pubmed: 26345690
Aging Cell. 2011 Jun;10(3):448-56
pubmed: 21385306
Growth Factors. 2016 Aug;34(3-4):97-106
pubmed: 27362476
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008 Mar;65(5):728-42
pubmed: 18193160
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1657-1665
pubmed: 29069558
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Dec;64(12):1207-11
pubmed: 19776215
J Ovarian Res. 2017 Jan 17;10(1):5
pubmed: 28095884
Exp Clin Transplant. 2010 Mar;8(1):55-60
pubmed: 20199372
Mol Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;19(4):205-15
pubmed: 23204433
Biol Reprod. 2005 May;72(5):1071-8
pubmed: 15616224
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1542-1547
pubmed: 30660724
Hum Reprod. 2013 Feb;28(2):423-9
pubmed: 23136145
Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):270-279
pubmed: 29304240
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):370-85
pubmed: 24430863
Reprod Sci. 2016 Jun;23(6):803-11
pubmed: 26674322
Semin Reprod Med. 2009 Nov;27(6):479-85
pubmed: 19806517
Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar;23(3):606-18
pubmed: 18216042
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Dec;28(12):1157-65
pubmed: 22105186
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2214-20
pubmed: 23219548
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145821
pubmed: 26717576
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Mar 07;13:12
pubmed: 25888918
Artif Organs. 2017 Jan;41(1):82-88
pubmed: 27097986
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jun;30(6):643-50
pubmed: 25892498
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Dec;23(6):755-64
pubmed: 22036190
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 Mar 9;8(1):55
pubmed: 28279229
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Apr;35(4):615-626
pubmed: 29497951
Artif Organs. 2016 Jun;40(6):E102-11
pubmed: 26813475
Free Radic Biol Med. 2009 Mar 15;46(6):783-90
pubmed: 19133326
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):427-35
pubmed: 26628641
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017 Sep;29(10):2052-2059
pubmed: 28182865
Theriogenology. 2015 Jan 15;83(2):285-93
pubmed: 25442020
Fertil Steril. 2012 Feb;97(2):387-90
pubmed: 22177311
J Ovarian Res. 2018 May 2;11(1):35
pubmed: 29716634
Artif Organs. 2019 Dec;43(12):E320-E332
pubmed: 31237688
Hum Reprod. 2016 Apr;31(4):774-81
pubmed: 26908843
Transplantation. 2016 Apr;100(4):825-35
pubmed: 26863473
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012 Apr;26(2):163-75
pubmed: 22074785
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Oct;35(10):1831-1841
pubmed: 30043336
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29
pubmed: 24399786