A survey of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy members' research involvement, and associated enablers and barriers.
Adult
Capacity Building
Cooperative Behavior
Cross-Sectional Studies
Europe
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Male
Mentors
Middle Aged
Pharmacy Research
/ organization & administration
Principal Component Analysis
Societies, Pharmaceutical
/ organization & administration
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Barriers
Clinical pharmacy
Enablers
European Society of Clinical Pharmacy
Research
Journal
International journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN: 2210-7711
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101554912
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
18
01
2020
accepted:
07
05
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Building research capacity of European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) members aligns to the organisation's aim of advancing research. Objective To determine members' aspirations and needs in research training and practice, and to explore ways in which ESCP could provide support. Setting ESCP's international membership. Method Cross-sectional survey of members in 2018, followed by focus groups with samples of respondents attending an ESCP symposium. Survey items were: research activities; interests, experience and confidence; and Likert statements on research conduct. Principal component analysis (PCA) clustering of Likert statements from a previous study was used, with scores for each component calculated. Focus groups discussed barriers to research and how ESCP could provide support. Data analysis involved collating and comparing all themes. Main outcome measures Research interest, experience and confidence; attitudinal items; barriers to research; ESCP support. Results The response rate was 16.7% (83/499), with 89.2% (n = 74) involved in research and 79.5% (n = 66) publishing research in the preceding 2 years. While overwhelmingly positive, responses were more positive for research interest than experience or confidence. PCA component scores (support/opportunities, motivation/outcomes, and roles/characteristics) were positive. Thirteen members participated in focus groups, identifying barriers of: insufficient collaboration; lack of knowledge, skills, training; unsupportive environment; insufficient time; and limited resources. ESCP could support through mentorship, collaboration, education and funding. Conclusion Study participants were highly active, interested, experienced, confident and positive regarding research. There is an opportunity for ESCP to harness these activities and provide support in the form of mentoring, education and training, and facilitating collaboration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32430883
doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01054-9
pii: 10.1007/s11096-020-01054-9
pmc: PMC7476984
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1073-1087Références
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Nov;15(11):1298-1308
pubmed: 30573416
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53-9
pubmed: 22396626
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Apr;22(2):154-61
pubmed: 22762255
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Mar;14(3):228-240
pubmed: 28506574
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Feb 23;6:5
pubmed: 16504090
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):725-48
pubmed: 25698363
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(99):1-188
pubmed: 26616119
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;8(6):183-197
pubmed: 28607668
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 22;11:CD011227
pubmed: 27873322
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 19;13:144
pubmed: 23597184
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Fam Pract. 2007 Jun;24(3):269-75
pubmed: 17504773
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48
pubmed: 10170434
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):608-22
pubmed: 24161491
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986